Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Norspan to Tramadol/Acetaminophen With Prolonged Postoperative Pain (PASSION)

June 1, 2016 updated by: Mundipharma Korea Ltd

A Multicenter, Phase IV, Interventional Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of NORSPAN to Tramadol/Acetaminophen in Patients With Prolonged Postoperative Pain After Spinal Surgery (PASSION)

The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of buprenorphine transdermal system to tramadol/acetaminophen.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

136

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of
        • Sanggye Paik Hospital, Dept. of Orthopedic Surgery

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Korean men and women aged 20 years or more
  • Presence of pain associated with a spinal disease and lumbar fusion at 1-2 spinal segments (1-2 level lumbar fusion surgery)
  • Moderate to severe pain of the NRS pain score ≥ 4 at Visit 1 (14~90 days after surgery, Baseline) (Amended 21Nov2013)
  • Consent to participate in the study and voluntary signature on the informed consent form

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Women of childbearing potential, except for the following cases:
  • A partner who is vasectomized or otherwise surgically sterile.
  • Use of 2 contraception methods. Two methods include the combination of double-barrier contraception or barrier contraception and hormone contraception, and appropriate barrier methods are as follows: Diaphragm (female contraceptive device), condom, intrauterine (copper or hormone), sponge or spermicide. Hormonal contraceptives include all commercially available products containing estrogen and/or progesterone.
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding women. Pregnant woman is defined as a woman after fertilization to late pregnancy with a positive result from the urine pregnancy test.
  • History of hypersensitivity to buprenorphine, tramadol, APAP or excipients, and celecoxib
  • Medical history of asthma, acute rhinitis, nasal polyp, vascular edema urticaria or allergic reaction to aspirin or other non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs(NSAIDs, COX-2)
  • Hypersensitivity or intolerance to Domperidone
  • Risk of gastrointestinal irritation such as gastrointestinal bleeding, mechanical ileus or perforation
  • Genetic problem such as galactose intolerance, Lapp lactase deficiency or glucose-galactose malabsorption
  • Severely impaired respiratory function or respiratory depression
  • Current use of monoamine oxidase(MAO) inhibitors or the medication history within 2 weeks prior to study participation
  • Convulsive disorder, head injury, shock, decreased level of consciousness of uncertain origin, intracranial lesion or increased intracranial pressure or severe hepatic impairment
  • Biliary tract disorder
  • Presence or suspected drug abuse history
  • Medical history of opioid or drug dependence
  • Current use of other CNS inhibitors or muscle relaxants that may result in dyspnea, hypotension, severe sedation or coma when used with the investigational product, opioid analgesics
  • Use of strong opioids, buprenorphine or tramadol/APAP within 1 week prior to study participation (however, study participation is allowed for PRN prescription of PCA and strong opioids)
  • Any condition representing a contraindication of application of buprenorphine, tramadol/APAP or celecoxib
  • Major pain not attributable to a spinal disease
  • Anticancer therapy that may affect pain assessment
  • Clinically significant cardiovascular or renal dysfunction
  • Postoperative complications
  • Symptoms of acute pain after lumbar fusion or characteristic analgesic features showing rapidly changing needs for analgesics
  • Current use of other investigational product at enrollment or within 30 days after administration of other investigational product

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: buprenorphine
Patch
Dosage and administration: This one patch should be attached every 7 days.
Other Names:
  • Norspan patch
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: tramadol/acetaminophen
Oral tablet

Amount of drug ingredients

: Acetaminophen 325 mg and Tramadol hydrochloride 37.5 mg in 1 tablet of this drug.

Dosage and administration:

Adjust dose depending on a patient's pain severity and treatment response. Starting at the initial dose of 2 tablets, usually administer 4 tablets per dose, twice daily. At a dosing interval of at least 12 hr, the daily dose should not exceed 8 tablets.

Other Names:
  • Ultracet ER semi

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in the Pain Intensity Score (0-10 NRS) From Visit 1 (Baseline) to 6weeks After Treatment.
Time Frame: baseline and 6 weeks
NRS-Pain scale assessed the severity of a subject's pain of mean pain over the past 24 hours prior to the visit on a scale of 0 (No pain) and 10 (Worst possible pain). Change = mean score at Week6/ET minus mean score at Baseline.
baseline and 6 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in the Pain Intensity Score (0-10 NRS) From Visit 1 (Baseline) to Week 2 of the Investigational Product Administration
Time Frame: 2 weeks
NRS-Pain scale assessed the severity of a subject's pain of mean pain over the past 24 hours prior to the visit on a scale of 0 (No pain) and 10 (Worst possible pain). Change = mean score at Week 2/ET minus mean score at Baseline.
2 weeks
Change in the Quality of Life (EQ-5D) Score From Visit 1 (Baseline) to Week 6 Post-dose
Time Frame: Baseline and at 6 weeks

EQ-5D to measure of health related quality of life should be answered as one of 3 levels about current condition for 5 dimensions for 'Motor capability', 'Self-care', 'Daily activities', 'Pain/discomfort', 'Depression/anxiety' and was calculated total average by giving a weighting on 3 level of answers (EQ-5D levels into 'no problems' (level 1) and 'problems' (level 2 and 3)).

*EQ-5D Total = 1 - 0.081 - (the score of the each level) - 0.269 (if at least one of level 3 presents)

EQ-5D total score could be 0.919 in maximum and -0.594 in minimum if case all index indicates the level 3. So, if EQ-5D total score closed by "1" means that the healthy condition and high quality of life.

Baseline and at 6 weeks
Change From Baseline in Health-related Quality of Life Assessed by EuroQol Visual Analog Scale (EQ-5D VAS)
Time Frame: Baseline and at 6weeks
The EQ VAS records the respondent's self-rated health on a vertical, visual analogue scale where the endpoints are labelled 'Best imaginable health state' (score = 100) and 'Worst imaginable health state' (score = 0). Higher points were positive results and positive points of difference gap means improvement results.
Baseline and at 6weeks
Clinical Global Impression of Change(CGIC)
Time Frame: 6 weeks
The number of patients who choose the best opinion of overall satisfaction among Clinical Global Impression of Change Scale(CGIC) among 7 point scale. Missing data was imputed by LOCF. Scores measure from 1: Very much improved to 7:very much worse.
6 weeks
Patient Global Impressions of Change(PGIC)
Time Frame: 6 weeks

In the PP set, Number of participants with categorical change in overall satisfaction.

PGIC: a participant-rated instrument assessing change in participant's overall satisfaction from baseline, on a scale ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse).

6 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jinhyok Kim, Dr.PhD, Sanggye Paik Hospital, Dept. of Orthopedic Surgery

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2013

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

November 1, 2014

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

November 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 14, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 5, 2013

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

November 13, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

July 11, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 1, 2016

Last Verified

June 1, 2016

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain

Clinical Trials on buprenorphine

Subscribe