The Treatment of Posterior Semicircular Canal Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo (BPPV)

January 6, 2014 updated by: Hong Ju Park, Asan Medical Center

The Effectiveness Comparison of Three Different Methods for the Treatment of Posterior Semicircular Canal Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo: Prospective, Double Blinded, Randomized, Multicenter Clinical Trial

The purpose of this study was to compare the treatment effectiveness of three different methods for posterior semicircular canal benign paroxysmal positional vertigo. The included methods are Modified Epley maneuver, Semont maneuver and Sham maneuver.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This study was a prospective, double blinded, randomized, multicenter clinical trial. The enrolled posterior semicircular canal benign paroxysmal positional vertigo patients were randomized to one of the three treatment regimens when they are diagnosed with the Dix-Hallpike test. An then the patient was treated with one of the three maneuvers. After 20 minutes, the patient was examined with the Dix-Hallpike test again. The resolution of nystagmus and symptoms were checked. When the nystagmus was sustained, the same treatment was applied once again. And after 20 minutes, the patient was examined with the Dix-Hallpike test too. 1 day after and 7 days after, the patient was re-examined with the Dix-Hallpike test.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
99

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Korea, Republic of
    • Songpa-gu
      • Seoul, Songpa-gu, Korea, Republic of, 138-736
        • Asan Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • a symptom of positional vertigo
  • rotational and upbeating nystagmus in Dix-Hallpike test
  • the nystagmus should be disappear within 60 seconds
  • no spontaneous nystagmus

Exclusion Criteria:

  • ages under 18 years
  • suspicious or verified a central nervous system lesion
  • traumatic vertigo patients
  • other otologic disease(acute/chronic otitis media, otosclerosis, etc)
  • other vestibular disease(vestibular neuronitis, Meniere's disease, etc)
  • congenital nystagmus patients
  • the patients with spinal disease
  • the patients with the limitation of cervical movement

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Epley maneuver
The group using modified Epley maneuver for PSCC BPPV
Procedure: Modified Epley maneuver
For Modified Epley maneuver, the patient was placed in the upright position with the head turned 45 degrees toward the affected ear. And then the patient was rapidly laid back to the supine head-hanging position for 1 minute. Next, the head was turned 90 degrees toward the other (unaffected) side for 1 minute. Next, the head is turned a further 90 degrees (usually necessitating the patient's body to also move from the supine position to the lateral decubitus position) such that the patient' head is nearly in the facedown position for 1 minute. The patient is then brought into the upright sitting position for 1 minute, completing the maneuver.
Active Comparator: Semont maneuver
The group using Semont maneuver for PSCC BPPV
Procedure: Semont maneuver
Patient's head was turned 45 degrees toward the healthy side. And then patient was rapidly moved to affected side-lying position and sustained for 2 minutes. Next, Patient is rapidly taken to the opposite side-lying position without pausing in the sitting position or changing the head position relative to the shoulder for 2 minutes. Next, Patient returns slowly with the head still tilted and fixed until the seated position for 1 minute.
Sham Comparator: Sham
The group using Reverse Epley maneuver for PSCC BPPV
Procedure: Reverse Epley maneuver
Like the modified Epley maneuver, but the direction was reverse.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Initial Effectiveness of Treatment for the Posterior Semicircular Canal Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo
Time Frame: 20 minutes
The immediate effectiveness of treatment was determined by otolaryngologists with the Dix-Hallpike test 20 minutes after initial manerver applied. The investigator had no information of the treatment applied to the patient. The complete resolution means absence of nystagmus and paroxysmal vertigo symptom. If there was a sustained nystagmus, the latency and duration was measured.
20 minutes

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Delayed Effectiveness of Treatment for the Posterior Semicircular Canal Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo
Time Frame: 1, 7 day
Ather 1 day and 7 days after the initial treatment was applied, the patients were re-visit the clinic and re-examined with the Dix-Hallpike test. The absence of nystagmus and vertigo was determinded.
1, 7 day

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Asan Medical Center

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: Hongju Park, Professor, Asan Medical Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
February 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
January 6, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 6, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
January 8, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
January 8, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 6, 2014

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
January 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • PSCC_BPPV_Kr

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings