Validation of Safety and Efficacy for Night Shift Therapy
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
California
-
Murrieta, California, United States, 92563
- Complete Sleep Solutions
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
The inclusion criteria are:
- be between the age of 18 and 75 years,
- have been diagnosed with Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) during polysomnography at a designated sleep center within 4 months of their enrollment,
- have not received treatment with any OSA therapy for more than 3 days within the past month,
- have an overall Apnea-Hypopnea Index (AHI) > 10 and hypopneas requiring >3% oxygen desaturation,
- having a non-supine Apnea-Hypopnea Index (AHI) < 15 if Continuous Positive Airway Pressure has not been attempted,
- have a overall AHI divided by the non-supine AHI > 1.5,
- had an Epworth Sleepiness Score of 5 or more at the time of diagnosis and at the start of therapy,
- Change in weight of no more than 5 pounds since the diagnostic PSG
- access to a computer and the Internet
- sleep is sometime between 8 P.M. to 9 A.M. Monday through Friday in the same bed
Exclusion Criteria:
- Neck, back or should pain which would impact ability to sleep laterally each night
- Body mass index > 35
- suffering from neurological disorders which result in ticks or tremors
- diagnosed with congestive heart failure or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
- suffered from a stroke within the previous 12 months
- taking or planning to take narcotic medications
- unfamiliar with use of internet browsers
- travel (i.e., foreign or cruise ship) which would limit internet or mail access
- planned medical procedures (e.g., surgery) which would limit device use during the scheduled 30-day study period or introduce the need for narcotic pain medications
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Positional feedback
Deliver therapy when the supine position is detected
|
Application of vibrotactile feedback to the neck when the supine position is detected
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Completed the Study at 4 Weeks Without Adverse Events
Time Frame: Four weeks
|
Assess the potential for adverse events by evaluating whether more than 20% of participants chose to terminate the study prior to completing 4 weeks of therapy.
|
Four weeks
|
|
Evaluate Efficacy Based on a Change in Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) Severity as a Result of Therapy
Time Frame: 30-days
|
Determine the percentage of participants that exhibited at least a 50% reduction in OSA severity measured by AHI after 4 weeks of therapy.
|
30-days
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Confirmation That Night Shift Accurately Detects Supine Position
Time Frame: baseline and 4-weeks later at follow up
|
Compute the percentage of participants at baseline and at followup in which the Night Shift's measurement of the supine position was within+/- 5% of the percent time supine by video recordings plus chest sensor (gold standard).
|
baseline and 4-weeks later at follow up
|
|
Evaluate Whether Night Shift Disrupts Sleep Such That Users Are Non-compliant
Time Frame: four weeks
|
Measure the percentage of nights across the 4 weeks of therapy the Night Shift was worn for a minimum of 5.5 hours/night or the length of time in bed by each participant.
|
four weeks
|
|
Evaluate Whether Patients Adapt and Sleep Through the Position Therapy Feedback
Time Frame: four weeks
|
Evaluate the percent time supine across four weeks of use and confirm that participants average less than 15% time supine across the four weeks of home use
|
four weeks
|
|
Evaluate Efficacy by Confirming Position Therapy Reduces Daytime Somnolence in Patients With Positional OSA
Time Frame: baseline and followup
|
The percentage of compliant participants who show an improved Epworth Sleepiness Score of >= 2 after 4 weeks of therapy when compared to the baseline score.
Epworth scores range from 0 (no daytime somnolence) to 21 being extreme somnolence.
A difference of 2 or more indicates some positive benefit from therapy.
|
baseline and followup
|
|
Evaluate Impact of Positional Therapy on Quality of Life Scores
Time Frame: four weeks
|
Compare the Functional Outcomes of Sleep (FOSQ) scores obtained at baseline and compare to results after 4 weeks of therapy to determine the percentage of compliant participants who demonstrate >2 point improvement.
The FOSQ includes thirty questions with numerically scaled responses which are totaled with an overall score of 1 identifying the most impaired and 120 identifying the least impaired.
|
four weeks
|
|
Assess the Accuracy of Night Shift's Detection of Sleep vs. Wake
Time Frame: baseline and follow-up
|
Compare the epochs staged wake and sleep by the reference standard (polysomnography) to the epochs staged wake and sleep by Night Shift to determine the sleep (sensitivity) and wake (specificity) classification accuracy.
|
baseline and follow-up
|
|
Assess the Accuracy of Night Shift's Measurement of Total Sleep Time
Time Frame: one night
|
Compared the Total Sleep Time (TST) from polysomnography to the Night Shift TST to tally the number of records with differences outside the range (151 to -129) defined by the predicate device.
|
one night
|
|
Assess the Accuracy of Night Shift Measurement of Sleep Efficiency
Time Frame: one night
|
Compare Sleep Efficiency (SE) obtained from PSG and compared to the Night Shift SE to determine if outliers are within the range (19.1 to -17.2%) defined by the predicate device
|
one night
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Daniel J Levendowski, MBA, Advanced Brain Monitoring, Inc.
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Levendowski DJ, Seagraves S, Popovic D, Westbrook PR. Assessment of a neck-based treatment and monitoring device for positional obstructive sleep apnea. J Clin Sleep Med. 2014 Aug 15;10(8):863-71. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.3956.
- Levendowski DJ, Veljkovic B, Seagraves S, Westbrook PR. Capability of a neck worn device to measure sleep/wake, airway position, and differentiate benign snoring from obstructive sleep apnea. J Clin Monit Comput. 2015 Feb;29(1):53-64. doi: 10.1007/s10877-014-9569-3. Epub 2014 Mar 6.
Helpful Links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 201301
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.