e-Pharmacovigilance II - Surveillance for Safety and Effectiveness - Calling for Earlier Detection of Adverse Reactions (CEDAR)

August 3, 2015 updated by: Elissa Klinger, Brigham and Women's Hospital

Specific Aim 1: To develop a patient-reported, EHR-integrated system to actively monitor the safety and effectiveness of treatment for patients taking FDA-approved medications for one of four common chronic conditions (diabetes, hypertension, insomnia, depression), with integrated management support by a pharmacist.

Specific Aim 2: To measure the reach, effectiveness, adoption and implementation of this integrated module for adult primary care patients in the Brigham and Women's Primary Care Practice-Based Research Network.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The study team has wide experience surveying primary care patients about medication problems, and has established that this is an important component of detecting and understanding ADEs among ambulatory patients. In the first study, 18% of primary care patients reported a problem due to a medication during the previous year, but this was documented in only 3% of medical records. A subsequent study found that 27% of patients reported a medication-related symptom, but that only 69% of patients discussed this symptom with their physician. Upon being notified via this automated pharmacovigilance, physicians changed therapy in response to 76% of these symptoms, and 21% symptoms that had not been previously discussed resulted in a preventable ADE and 2% resulted in a preventable ADE.

During the prior CERT, the investigators developed an interactive voice response system (IVRS) that interoperates with the health system EHR, and demonstrated that IVRS can be used to monitor ambulatory patients to assess adherence, medication related symptoms, and ADEs. This study builds on that initial work.

The safety of prescription drugs represents an ongoing public health concern. A study by the US General Accounting Office (GAO) found that 51% of all approved drugs have at least one serious ADE that was not recognized during the approval process, reflecting the careful selection and limited number of patients who participate in pre-approval trials. While pre-market studies detect commonly occurring ADEs and efficacy in rigorously selected participants, they are not designed to assess safety and effectiveness in the broader population of eventual users. While the FDA maintains a passive adverse event reporting system, it is estimated that only about 1% of all ADEs and 10% of serious ADEs are reported, and these case reports lack accurate denominators to estimate incidence. While efforts are underway to substantially expand capacity for active surveillance using electronic health records and claims data, these data may not fully capture the patient experience, as clinicians often do not fully document patients' symptoms.

Accurate ascertainment of ADEs and effectiveness in clinical practice requires real-time systems that integrate patient-reported information with clinician decision-making. Telephonic IVRS are a low-cost, sustainable way of reaching out to primary care populations, independent of a visit. In addition to monitoring for ADEs, this technology could be used to systematically assess treatment outcomes that are not commonly documented in the medical chart such as functional status, sleep, and mood.

This 5 year project will have three phases: (1) development and pilot testing of the integrated pharmacovigilance system; (2) implementation; and (3) assessment of the translation and dissemination of the system, including data collection from both patients and providers. The RE-AIM (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance) conceptual model provides a framework to examine the success of translation and dissemination of this system, and will be used for the third phase of the project.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
38400

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02115
        • Brigham and Women's Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

21 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • receives primary care at one of the Brigham-affiliated ambulatory care clinics
  • has received a new prescription for an oral agent to treat diabetes, hypertension, depression, or insomnia
  • prescribed new target drug within last month by a provider at one of the participating clinics

Exclusion Criteria:

  • not a true "new start," i.e. patient new to clinic/health system
  • patient prescribed the drug for short term use, i.e. less than a week's dose
  • patient prescribed same drug less than 2 years prior

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Intervention group, IVR call, RPh counseling
Group receives interactive voice response automated call asking about side effects of newly prescribed medications; has opportunity to speak with study pharmacist via phone about medication
Behavioral: Intervention arm - automated call and phone-based pharmacist counseling
patients receive automated phone call with questions about side effects and an opportunity to speak with a pharmacist
No Intervention: Control
Intervention patients are matched with control patients; control patients have only chart review completed.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Discontinuation of mediation
Time Frame: 6-8 months after initial recruitment
Was medication thought to be associated with adverse drug reaction discontinued in the patient chart?
6-8 months after initial recruitment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Adverse drug reaction awareness
Time Frame: 6-8 months following recruitment
evidence of adverse drug reaction awareness in patient chart - ADR discussed with provider, dose changed, medication switched.
6-8 months following recruitment

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Call metrics
Time Frame: Ongoing assessment as part of quality assurance and quality improvment; final call disposition to be assigned to each patient 1-2 weeks following the 1st IVRS call (4-6 weeks following initiation of target drug) and the 2nd IVR call (4-6 months later)
How many people were successfully counseled on the phone by the pharmacist about medications - adherence, safety, side effects. How many people reported a side effect but chose not to speak with the pharmacist. How many people completed a partial survey via phone.
Ongoing assessment as part of quality assurance and quality improvment; final call disposition to be assigned to each patient 1-2 weeks following the 1st IVRS call (4-6 weeks following initiation of target drug) and the 2nd IVR call (4-6 months later)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Brigham and Women's Hospital

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Gordon Schiff, MD, Brigham and Women's Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
March 1, 2015

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
August 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 11, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 12, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 14, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 4, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 3, 2015

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2012-P000210

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Depression

Clinical Trials on Intervention arm - automated call and phone-based pharmacist counseling

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings