Evaluate Time Associated With the Preparation & Administration of Denosumab/Pamidronate in Patients With Solid Tumors and Metastatic Bone Disease

February 16, 2015 updated by: Amgen

An Open-Label, Multicentre Trial to Evaluate the Time Associated With the Preparation and Administration of Denosumab and Pamidronate in Subjects With Solid Tumors and Metastatic Bone Disease in Canada

This study will estimate the total time for the preparation and administration of denosumab and the total time for the preparation and administration of pamidronate.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Withdrawn

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of metastatic bone disease secondary to a solid tumor (eg, breast cancer, lung cancer, etc).
  • An Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1.

  • Subject is one of the following:

    • being considered for pamidronate IV infusions or denosumab SC injections for treatment of metastatic bone disease (prescribed per Canadian product monograph); OR
    • scheduled to receive pamidronate IV infusions or denosumab SC injections for treatment of metastatic bone disease (prescribed per Canadian product monograph); OR
    • currently receiving pamidronate IV infusions or denosumab SC injections for treatment of metastatic bone disease AND has received no more than 4 prior administration of either product combined (prescribed per Canadian product monograph).
  • Subject has a serum calcium or albumin-adjusted serum calcium ≥ 2.0 mmol/L (8.0 mg/dL) and ≤ 2.9 mmol/L (11.5 mg/dL)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis with metastatic bone disease secondary to multiple myeloma or prostate cancer.
  • Severe renal impairment (creatinine clearance < 30 mL/min)
  • Subject is being considered for ambulatory pamidronate administration using an infuser device (ie, "baby bottle").
  • A known active infection with Hepatitis B virus or Hepatitis C virus.

  • Subject has known positive results for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV).Subject has a history of other malignancy within the past 5 years, other than:

    • Malignancy treated with curative intent and with no known active disease present for ≥ 5 years before enrollment and felt to be at low risk for recurrence by the treating physician
    • Adequately treated non-melanoma skin cancer or lentigo maligna without evidence of disease
    • Adequately treated cervical carcinoma in situ without evidence of disease
    • Adequately treated breast ductal carcinoma in situ without evidence of disease
    • Prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia without evidence of prostate cancer
    • Adequately treated urothelial papillary noninvasive carcinoma or carcinoma in situ.
  • Subject has a history or current evidence of osteonecrosis/osteomyelitis of the jaw, active dental or jaw condition that requires oral surgery, non-healed dental/oral surgery, or planned invasive dental procedure over the course of the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Treatment Group A
1 dose of denosumab every 4 weeks for 2 doses, followed by 1 dose of pamidronate every 4 weeks for 2 doses.
Biological: denosumab
Treatment Group A - 120 mg SC dose every 4 weeks at Day 1 and week 5 Treatment Group B - 120 mg SC dose every 4 weeks at Week 9 and Week 13
Other Names:
  • XGEVA
Drug: pamidronate
Treatment Group A - 90 mg IV dose every 4 weeks at Week 9 and Week 13 Treatment Group B - 90 mg IV dose every 4 weeks at Day 1 and Week 5
Other Names:
  • Aredia
Active Comparator: Treatment Group B
1 dose of pamidronate every 4 weeks for 2 doses, followed by 1 dose of denosumab every 4 weeks for 2 doses.
Biological: denosumab
Treatment Group A - 120 mg SC dose every 4 weeks at Day 1 and week 5 Treatment Group B - 120 mg SC dose every 4 weeks at Week 9 and Week 13
Other Names:
  • XGEVA
Drug: pamidronate
Treatment Group A - 90 mg IV dose every 4 weeks at Week 9 and Week 13 Treatment Group B - 90 mg IV dose every 4 weeks at Day 1 and Week 5
Other Names:
  • Aredia

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Total duration (in hours, minutes and seconds) for investigational product preparation and administration
Time Frame: Day 1
Day 1
Total duration (in hours, minutes and seconds) for investigational product preparation and administration
Time Frame: Week 5
Week 5
Total duration (in hours, minutes and seconds) for investigational product preparation and administration
Time Frame: Week 9
Week 9
Total duration (in hours, minutes and seconds) for investigational product preparation and administration
Time Frame: Week 13
Week 13

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Amgen

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
November 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
November 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
November 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 12, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 28, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 2, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
February 18, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 16, 2015

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
January 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 20120127

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Solid Tumor

Clinical Trials on denosumab

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings