Second Line Sorafenib After Pazopanib in Patients With RCC (SOAP)

November 21, 2017 updated by: Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano

Activity and Safety of Second Line SOrafenib After Pazopanib in Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma (SOAP Study)

  • Retrospective studies showed Sorafenib's efficacy as second line treatment after a Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor (TKI).
  • Currently there is no standard of treatment in 2nd line for patients treated in first line with pazopanib for metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma (mRCC).
  • With this trial we evaluate the efficacy of sorafenib as second line of treatment in patients treated with pazopanib for mRCC.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Terminated

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

  • Retrospective studies showed Sorafenib's efficacy as second line treatment after a TKI: AXIS study showed sorafenib activity, in terms of Overall Response Rate (ORR), and the absence statistically significant difference in Overall Survival (OS) between the 2 arms, although there is a significant OS increase of 1.4 months in the Axitinib arm. The INTORSECT study (temsirolimus vs sorafenib in 2nd line after sunitinib) didn't demonstrate statistically significant difference for Progression Free Survival (PFS), but it showed an OS increase in patients treated with sorafenib.
  • The COMPARZ study demonstrated the non-inferiority of pazopanib vs sunitinib in 1st line of treatment for mRCC.
  • Currently there is no standard of treatment in 2nd line for patients treated in first line with pazopanib for mRCC.
  • Primary objective:to evaluate the efficacy of sorafenib (PFS) as second line of treatment in patients treated with pazopanib for mRCC.
  • Secondary objectives: To evaluate the safety of sorafenib in patients previously treated with pazopanib. To evaluate the Overall Survival. To evaluate the Quality of Life through specific questionnaires (FKSI-19; European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer quality of life questionnaire -C30).To assess the predictive role for PFS and OS of arterial blood pressure increase from baseline to week 4 and 8 after start of treatment with sorafenib. To assess the predictive role for PFS and OS of hand-foot syndrome before week 4 and 8 after start of treatment with sorafenib.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
16

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Italy
    • Mi
      • Milan, Mi, Italy, 20156
        • Istituto Tumori

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Patients with histological diagnosis of Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC)
  • Measurable disease
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status of 0 or 1
  • Life expectancy of at least 12 weeks.

  • Adequate bone marrow, liver and renal function as assessed by the following laboratory requirements to be conducted within 7 days prior to screening:

    • Hemoglobin >= 10.0 g/dl
    • Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) >1,500/mm3
    • Platelet count >= 100,000/ml
    • Total bilirubin ≤ 1.5 times the upper limit of normal
    • ALT and AST ≤ 2.5 x upper limit of normal
    • Alkaline phosphatase ≤ 4 x upper limit of normal
    • prothrombin time-international normalized ratio /partial thromboplastin time ≤ 1.5 x upper limit of normal [Patients who are being therapeutically anticoagulated with an agent such as coumadin or heparin will be allowed to participate provided that no prior evidence of underlying abnormality in these parameters exists.] For patients on warfarin, close monitoring of at least weekly evaluations will be performed, until international normalized ratio is stable based on a measurement at pre-dose, as defined by the local standard of care.
  • Prognosis according to Heng: good or intermediate
  • Previous treatment with pazopanib
  • Pregnant or breast-feeding patients. Women of childbearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test performed within 7 days of the start of treatment. Both men and women enrolled in this trial must use adequate barrier birth control measures during the course of the trial and two weeks after the completion of trial.
  • Signed informed consent must be obtained prior to any study specific procedures

Exclusion Criteria:

  • First line treatment for metastatic RCC other than pazopanib.
  • History of cardiac disease: congestive heart failure >New York Heart Association class 2; active CAD (MI more than 6 mo prior to study entry is allowed); cardiac arrhythmias requiring anti-arrhythmic therapy (beta blockers or digoxin are permitted) or uncontrolled hypertension (>= 160 mmHg systolic and/or 90 mmHg diastolic).
  • History of HIV infection
  • Active clinically serious infections (> grade 2 NCI-CTC version 3.0)
  • Brain or meningeal metastases
  • Patients with seizure disorder requiring medication (such as steroids or anti-epileptics)
  • History of organ allograft
  • Patients with evidence or history of bleeding diathesis
  • Patients undergoing renal dialysis

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: sorafenib
Sorafenib 400 mg bid
Drug: Sorafenib
Sorafenib 400 mg bid
Other Names:
  • Nexavar

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Progression Free Survival (months) of patients treated with sorafenib after progression to pazopanib
Time Frame: 24 months
24 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Safety profile of sorafenib using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) criteria v.4.0 in patients previously treated with pazopanib
Time Frame: 24 months
24 months
Overall Survival (months) of patients treated with sorafenib after pazopanib progression
Time Frame: 24 months
24 months
Quality of Life of patients treated with sorafenib after pazopanib progression using the specific questionnaires FKSI-19 and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer quality of life questionnaire -C30.
Time Frame: 24 months
24 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
November 8, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
November 8, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 6, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 22, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 24, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
November 22, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 21, 2017

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
November 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • GP2
  • Istituto Tumori Milano (Other Identifier: Ethical board)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma

Clinical Trials on Sorafenib

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings