Evaluation of the Safety and Efficacy of Reformulated Raltegravir (MK-0518) 1200 mg Once Daily in Combination With TRUVADA™ in Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)-1 Infected, Treatment-Naive Participants (MK-0518-292) (onceMRK)

January 11, 2019 updated by: Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC

A Phase III Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized, Active Comparator-Controlled Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Reformulated Raltegravir 1200 mg Once Daily Versus Raltegravir 400 mg Twice Daily, Each in Combination With TRUVADA™, in Treatment-Naïve HIV-1 Infected Subjects

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of reformulated raltegravir (MK-0518) 1200 mg once daily in combination with TRUVADA™ versus raltegravir 400 mg twice daily in combination with TRUVADA™ in HIV-1 infected, treatment-naive participants. The primary hypothesis being tested is that reformulated raltegravir 1200 mg once-daily is non-inferior to raltegravir 400 mg twice-daily, each in combination therapy with TRUVADA™, as assessed by the proportion of participants achieving HIV-1 ribonucleic acid (RNA) <40 copies/mL at Week 48.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
802

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 3

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • HIV-1 positive
  • Naïve to antiretroviral therapy including investigational antiretroviral agents
  • Not of reproductive potential or, if of reproductive potential agrees to 1) true abstinence, or 2) use of an acceptable method of birth control during the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Use of recreational or illicit drugs or has recent history of drug or alcohol abuse or dependence
  • Has been treated for a viral infection other than HIV-1 (such as hepatitis B) with an agent that is active against HIV-1 including but not limited to adefovir, tenofovir, entecavir, emtricitabine, or lamivudine
  • Has documented or known resistance to raltegravir, emtricitabine, and/or tenofovir before the first dose of study drug
  • Has participated in a study with an investigational compound or device within 30 days or anticipates participating in such a study during this study
  • Has used systemic immunosuppressive therapy or immune modulators within 30 days or is anticipated to need them during the study (short courses of corticosteroids are allowed)
  • Requires or is anticipated to require any of the following prohibited medications while in the study: phenobarbital, phenytoin, rifampin, rifabutin, or calcium, magnesium and aluminum containing antacids, such as TUMS™, Maalox™ and Milk of Magnesia™
  • Has significant hypersensitivity or other contraindication to any of the components of the study drugs
  • Has current, active diagnosis of acute hepatitis due to any cause
  • Is pregnant, breastfeeding, or expecting to conceive during the study
  • Female participant expecting to donate eggs or male participant expecting to donate sperm during the study
  • Is or has a family member (spouse or children) who is investigational staff or sponsor staff directly involved in this trial

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Reformulated Raltegravir
Reformulated raltegravir 1200 mg (2x 600 mg tablets) orally once daily plus placebo to raltegravir 1 tablet orally twice daily plus TRUVADA™ orally once daily for 96 weeks
Drug: Reformulated Raltegravir
Reformulated raltegravir 1200 mg (2x 600 mg tablets) orally once daily
Drug: TRUVADA™
Emtricitabine / tenofovir disoproxil fumarate 200 / 300 mg tablet administered once-daily with food (open-label)
Drug: Placebo to Raltegravir
Placebo to raltegravir 1 tablet orally twice daily
Active Comparator: Raltegravir
Raltegravir 400 mg tablet orally twice daily plus placebo to reformulated raltegravir 2 tablets orally once daily plus TRUVADA™ orally once daily for 96 weeks
Drug: TRUVADA™
Emtricitabine / tenofovir disoproxil fumarate 200 / 300 mg tablet administered once-daily with food (open-label)
Drug: Raltegravir
Raltegravir 400 mg tablet orally twice daily
Drug: Placebo to Reformulated Raltegravir
Placebo to reformulated raltegravir 2 tablets orally once daily

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants Achieving <40 Copies/mL Human Immunodeficiency Virus-1 (HIV-1) Ribonucleic Acid (RNA) at Week 48
Time Frame: Week 48
From blood samples collected at week 48, HIV-1 RNA levels were determined by the Abbott RealTime HIV-1 Assay, which has a limit of reliable quantification (LoQ) of 40 copies/mL. The NC=F approach as defined by FDA "snapshot" approach was used as the primary approach to analysis where all missing data were treated as failures regardless of the reason.
Week 48

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants Achieving <40 Copies/mL Human Immunodeficiency Virus-1 (HIV-1) Ribonucleic Acid (RNA) at Week 96
Time Frame: Week 96
From blood samples collected at week 96, HIV-1 RNA levels were determined by the Abbott RealTime HIV-1 Assay, which has a limit of reliable quantification (LoQ) of 40 copies/mL. The NC=F approach as defined by FDA "snapshot" approach was used as the primary approach to analysis where all missing data were treated as failures regardless of the reason.
Week 96
Change From Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation 4 (CD4) Cell Count at Week 48
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 48
CD4 cells were counted from blood collected at baseline and week 48, and the change from baseline determined from week 48 minus baseline values.
Baseline and Week 48
Change From Baseline in CD4 Cell Count at Week 96
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 96
CD4 cells were counted from blood collected at baseline and week 96, and the change from baseline determined from week 96 minus baseline values.
Baseline and Week 96
Percentage of Participants With an Adverse Event (AE) at Week 48
Time Frame: Up to Week 48
An adverse event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavourable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product or protocol-specified procedure, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product or protocol-specified procedure. Any worsening (i.e., any clinically significant adverse change in frequency and/or intensity) of a preexisting condition that is temporally associated with the use of the Sponsor's product, is also an AE.
Up to Week 48
Percentage of Participants With an AE After 96 Weeks of Treatment
Time Frame: Up to Week 98 (96 weeks of treatment + 2 weeks of follow up)
An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavourable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product or protocol-specified procedure, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product or protocol-specified procedure. Any worsening (i.e., any clinically significant adverse change in frequency and/or intensity) of a preexisting condition that is temporally associated with the use of the Sponsor's product, is also an AE.
Up to Week 98 (96 weeks of treatment + 2 weeks of follow up)
Percentage of Participants With a Drug-Related AE at Week 48
Time Frame: Up to Week 48
An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavourable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product or protocol-specified procedure, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product or protocol-specified procedure. Any worsening (i.e., any clinically significant adverse change in frequency and/or intensity) of a preexisting condition that is temporally associated with the use of the Sponsor's product, is also an AE. An investigator who is a qualified physician evaluated whether or not an AE was drug-related.
Up to Week 48
Percentage of Participants With a Drug-Related AE After 96 Weeks of Treatment
Time Frame: Up to Week 98 (96 weeks of treatment + 2 weeks of follow up)
An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavourable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product or protocol-specified procedure, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product or protocol-specified procedure. Any worsening (i.e., any clinically significant adverse change in frequency and/or intensity) of a preexisting condition that is temporally associated with the use of the Sponsor's product, is also an AE. An investigator who is a qualified physician evaluated whether or not an AE was drug-related.
Up to Week 98 (96 weeks of treatment + 2 weeks of follow up)
Percentage of Participants With a Serious Adverse Event (SAE) at Week 48
Time Frame: Up to Week 48
A serious adverse event (SAE) is any AE occurring at any dose or during any use of Sponsor's product that does the following: results in death; is life threatening; results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; results in or prolongs an existing inpatient hospitalization; is a congenital anomaly/birth defect; is a cancer; is associated with an overdose; is another important medical event.
Up to Week 48
Percentage of Participants With a SAE After 96 Weeks of Treatment
Time Frame: Up to Week 98 (96 weeks of treatment + 2 weeks of follow up)
A SAE is any AE occurring at any dose or during any use of Sponsor's product that does the following: results in death; is life threatening; results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; results in or prolongs an existing inpatient hospitalization; is a congenital anomaly/birth defect; is a cancer; is associated with an overdose; is another important medical event.
Up to Week 98 (96 weeks of treatment + 2 weeks of follow up)
Percentage of Participants With a Serious and Drug-Related AE at Week 48
Time Frame: Up to Week 48
A SAE is any AE occurring at any dose or during any use of Sponsor's product that does the following: results in death; is life threatening; results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; results in or prolongs an existing inpatient hospitalization; is a congenital anomaly/birth defect; is a cancer; is associated with an overdose; is another important medical event. An investigator who is a qualified physician evaluated whether or not a SAE is drug-related.
Up to Week 48
Percentage of Participants With a Serious and Drug-Related AE After 96 Weeks of Treatment
Time Frame: Up to Week 98 (96 weeks of treatment + 2 weeks of follow up)
A SAE is any AE occurring at any dose or during any use of Sponsor's product that does the following: results in death; is life threatening; results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; results in or prolongs an existing inpatient hospitalization; is a congenital anomaly/birth defect; is a cancer; is associated with an overdose; is another important medical event. An investigator who is a qualified physician evaluated whether or not a SAE is drug-related.
Up to Week 98 (96 weeks of treatment + 2 weeks of follow up)
Percentage of Participants Who Discontinued From Drug Therapy Due to an AE at Week 48
Time Frame: Up to Week 48
An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavourable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product or protocol-specified procedure, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product or protocol-specified procedure. Any worsening (i.e., any clinically significant adverse change in frequency and/or intensity) of a preexisting condition that is temporally associated with the use of the Sponsor's product, is also an AE
Up to Week 48
Percentage of Participants Who Discontinued From Drug Therapy Due to an AE up to Week 96
Time Frame: Up to Week 96
An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavourable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product or protocol-specified procedure, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product or protocol-specified procedure. Any worsening (i.e., any clinically significant adverse change in frequency and/or intensity) of a preexisting condition that is temporally associated with the use of the Sponsor's product, is also an AE
Up to Week 96

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
May 23, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 21, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 19, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 2, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 2, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
May 6, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
January 30, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 11, 2019

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
January 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 0518-292
  • 2013-001939-47 (EudraCT Number)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

http://engagezone.msd.com/doc/ProcedureAccessClinicalTrialData.pdf

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings