A Double-blind Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Intranasal Esketamine for the Rapid Reduction of the Symptoms of Major Depressive Disorder, Including Suicidal Ideation, in Participants Who Are Assessed to be at Imminent Risk for Suicide

April 25, 2025 updated by: Janssen Research & Development, LLC

A Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Intranasal Esketamine for the Rapid Reduction of the Symptoms of Major Depressive Disorder, Including Suicidal Ideation, in Subjects Who Are Assessed to be at Imminent Risk for Suicide

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of intranasal esketamine 84 milligram (mg) compared with intranasal placebo along with standard care treatment, in reducing the symptoms of major depressive disorder (MDD) (an affective disorder manifested by either a dysphoric mood or loss of interest or pleasure in usual activities, the mood disturbance is prominent and relatively persistent), including the risk for suicide as assessed by the Investigator, in participants who will be assessed to be at imminent risk for suicide.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This is a randomized (study medication assigned to participants by chance), double-blind (neither physician nor participant knows assigned study treatment), placebo-controlled (participants are randomly assigned to a test treatment or to an identical-appearing treatment that does not contain the test drug), and multicenter (when more than one hospital or medical school team works on a medical research study), study of esketamine in participants with major depressive disorder (MDD) in participants who will be assessed to be at imminent risk for suicide, as measured by the change from Baseline on the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score at 4 hours postdose on Day 1. The duration of study will be approximately 81 days per participant. The study consists of 3 parts: Screening (that is, with in 1 day before study commences on Day 1) and double-blind Treatment (from Day 1-25) and Follow-up (from Day 26 up to Day 81). All the eligible participants will be provided standard care treatment and will be randomly assigned to either esketmaine or placebo treatment. Esketamine/placebo will be administered by intranasal route (delivery of medications through the nasal mucosa) two times per week for 4 weeks. Efficacy of the participants will be primarily evaluated through MADRS. Participants' safety will be monitored throughout the study.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
68

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Alabama
      • Birmingham, Alabama, United States
    • California
      • San Diego, California, United States
    • Connecticut
      • Hartford, Connecticut, United States
      • New Haven, Connecticut, United States
    • Georgia
      • Atlanta, Georgia, United States
    • Iowa
      • Iowa City, Iowa, United States
    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States
      • Towson, Maryland, United States
    • Michigan
      • Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
    • Minnesota
      • Rochester, Minnesota, United States
    • Ohio
      • Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
    • Pennsylvania
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
      • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 64 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Participants must meet Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth edition (DSM-IV) diagnostic criteria for major depressive disorder
  • Participants must have current suicidal ideation with intent
  • In the Investigator's opinion, participant must be in need of acute psychiatric hospitalization due to imminent risk of suicide
  • Participant has a Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score of greater than or equal to (>=) 22 predose on Day 1
  • As part of standard of care treatment, participant agrees to be hospitalized voluntarily for a recommended period of 5 days after randomization (that is, through Day 5), and take prescribed non-investigational antidepressant therapy(ies) for at least the duration of the double-blind treatment phase (Day 25)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participant has a current clinical diagnosis of bipolar or related disorders, intellectual disability, or cluster b personality disorder (example, borderline personality disorder, antisocial personality disorder, histrionic personality disorder, and narcissistic personality disorder)
  • Participant meets DSM-IV criteria for borderline personality disorder, based on clinical interview
  • Participant has a current or prior diagnosis of a psychotic disorder, major depressive disorder (MDD) with psychosis, or obsessive compulsive disorder
  • Participant with a history or current signs and symptoms of liver or renal insufficiency; significant cardiac, vascular, pulmonary, gastrointestinal, endocrine, neurologic, hematologic, rheumatologic, or metabolic disturbances
  • Participant has uncontrolled hypertension (systolic blood pressure greater than [>] 160 millimeter of mercury [mmHg] or diastolic blood pressure > 90 mmHg) despite diet, exercise or a stable dose of an allowed anti-hypertensive treatment at Screening; or any past history of hypertensive crisis

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Esketamine
Esketamine hydrochloride solution (containing 14 milligram (mg) of esketamine base per 100 microliter [mcl] of intranasal spray) will be administered by intranasal route using nasal spray pump as two times a week, for 4 weeks. Dose may be reduced to 56 mg per day based on Investigator's discretion.
Drug: Esketamine
Esketamine 84 mg will be self-administered by participants as intranasal spray as two times a week, for 4 weeks (that is, Day 1,4,8,11,15,18,22,25). Dose may be reduced to 56 mg per day based on Investigator's discretion.
Other Names:
  • Esketamine hydrochloride
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Matching Placebo solution will be administered by intranasal route using nasal spray pump as two times a week, for 4 weeks.
Drug: Placebo
Matching placebo will be self-administered by participants as intranasal spray as two times a week, for 4 weeks (that is, Day 1,4,8,11,15,18,22,25).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline to Day 1: 4-Hour Post-dose in Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score (Double-blind Phase)
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1-Predose) to Day 1: 4-hours post-dose
The MADRS consists of 10 items that cover all of the core depressive symptoms (apparent sadness, reported sadness, inner tension, sleep, appetite, concentration, lassitude, interest level, pessimistic thoughts, and suicidal thoughts). Each item is scored from 0 (item is not present or is normal) to 6 (severe or continuous presence of the symptom). A total score (0 to 60) is calculated by adding the scores of all 10 items. For each item as well as the total score, a higher score represents a more severe condition. The last observation carried forward (LOCF) approach was used for missing visit data in the ITT LOCF efficacy analyses.
Baseline (Day 1-Predose) to Day 1: 4-hours post-dose

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants With Sustained Response Based on MADRS Total Score (Double-blind Phase)
Time Frame: Day 1 to Day 25
Sustained response is defined as a reduction from baseline in MADRS total score of greater than or equal to 50 percent, with onset on Day 1 that is maintained through the end of the double-blind phase (Day 25). The MADRS consists of 10 items that cover all of the core depressive symptoms (apparent sadness, reported sadness, inner tension, sleep, appetite, concentration, lassitude, interest level, pessimistic thoughts, and suicidal thoughts). Each item is scored from 0 (item is not present or is normal) to 6 (severe or continuous presence of the symptom). A total score (0 to 60) is calculated by adding the scores of all 10 items. For each item as well as the total score, a higher score represents a more severe condition. The LOCF approach was used for missing visit data in the ITT LOCF efficacy analyses.
Day 1 to Day 25
Change From Baseline to Day 2 in MADRS Total Score (Double-blind Phase)
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1-predose) to Day 2
The MADRS consists of 10 items that cover all of the core depressive symptoms (apparent sadness, reported sadness, inner tension, sleep, appetite, concentration, lassitude, interest level, pessimistic thoughts, and suicidal thoughts). Each item is scored from 0 (item is not present or is normal) to 6 (severe or continuous presence of the symptom). A total score (0 to 60) is calculated by adding the scores of all 10 items. For each item as well as the total score, a higher score represents a more severe condition. The LOCF approach was used for missing visit data in the ITT LOCF efficacy analyses.
Baseline (Day 1-predose) to Day 2
Change From Baseline to Double-blind Phase-End Point (Day 25) in MADRS Total Score (Double-blind Phase)
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1-predose) to Double-blind Phase-End Point (Day 25)
The MADRS consists of 10 items that cover all of the core depressive symptoms (apparent sadness, reported sadness, inner tension, sleep, appetite, concentration, lassitude, interest level, pessimistic thoughts, and suicidal thoughts). Each item is scored from 0 (item is not present or is normal) to 6 (severe or continuous presence of the symptom). A total score (0 to 60) is calculated by adding the scores of all 10 items. For each item as well as the total score, a higher score represents a more severe condition. The LOCF approach was used for missing visit data in the ITT LOCF efficacy analyses. The last post baseline observation was carried forward as the "End Point" for the double-blind phase.
Baseline (Day 1-predose) to Double-blind Phase-End Point (Day 25)
Percentage of Participants With Response Based on MADRS Total Score During the Double-Blind Phase
Time Frame: Day 1 (4 hours postdose), Day 2 (double blind phase), Double blind phase -Endpoint (Day 25)
Percentage of participants with response (greater than or equal to (>=) 50% improvement from baseline in MADRS total score) during the double- blind phase was assessed. The MADRS consists of 10 items that cover all of the core depressive symptoms (apparent sadness, reported sadness, inner tension, sleep, appetite, concentration, lassitude, interest level, pessimistic thoughts, and suicidal thoughts). Each item is scored from 0 (item is not present or is normal) to 6 (severe or continuous presence of the symptom). A total score (0 to 60) is calculated by adding the scores of all 10 items. For each item as well as the total score, a higher score represents a more severe condition.
Day 1 (4 hours postdose), Day 2 (double blind phase), Double blind phase -Endpoint (Day 25)
Percentage of Participants With Response Based on MADRS Total Score at Follow up Phase Endpoint
Time Frame: Follow up phase-endpoint (Day 81)
Percentage of participants with response (greater than or equal to (>=) 50% improvement from baseline in MADRS total score) during the follow up was assessed. The MADRS consists of 10 items that cover all of the core depressive symptoms (apparent sadness, reported sadness, inner tension, sleep, appetite, concentration, lassitude, interest level, pessimistic thoughts, and suicidal thoughts). Each item is scored from 0 (item is not present or is normal) to 6 (severe or continuous presence of the symptom). A total score (0 to 60) is calculated by adding the scores of all 10 items. For each item as well as the total score, a higher score represents a more severe condition.
Follow up phase-endpoint (Day 81)
Change From Baseline to Day 1: 4-hours Post-dose in Suicide Ideation and Behavior Assessment Tool (SIBAT)-Clinical Global Judgment of Suicide Risk (CGJ-SR) Module 8 Score (Double-blind Phase)
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1-predose) to Day 1: 4-hours Postdose
SIBAT CGJ-SR: Module 8 operates numerous clinical global impression (CGI) severity scales used in other psychiatric studies. Changes in CGJ-SR designed to categorize clinically meaningful changes in clinician rated suicide risk from 'not at all suicidal' to 'participant is at imminent risk of suicide and immediate need for strong intervention (hospitalization with 24 hour 1:1 observation).' Patient scores for clinician-rated suicide risk: 0 (not suicidal); 1(occasional suicidal ideas, no intervention required);2(some clear suicidal ideas present),3(suicidal risk requires scheduled outpatient follow-up,no immediate intervention),4(suicidal risk requires immediate intervention, no hospitalization). 5( suicidal risk requires immediate hospitalization, no suicide precautions),6 (suicide risk requires hospitalization with suicide precautions). LOCF approach used for missing visit data in ITT LOCF efficacy analyses.
Baseline (Day 1-predose) to Day 1: 4-hours Postdose
Change From Baseline to Day 2 in Suicide Ideation and Behavior Assessment Tool (SIBAT)-Clinical Global Judgment of Suicide Risk (SIBAT CGJ-SR) Module 8 Score (Double-blind Phase)
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1-predose) to Day 2
SIBAT CGJ-SR: Module 8 operates like numerous other CGI severity scales used in other psychiatric studies. Changes in CGJ-SR designed to categorize clinically meaningful changes in clinician rated suicide risk from 'not at all suicidal' to 'participant is at imminent risk of suicide and immediate need for strong intervention (hospitalization with 24 hour 1:1 observation).' Patient scores for clinician-rated suicide risk: 0 (not suicidal); 1(occasional suicidal ideas, no intervention required);2(some clear suicidal ideas present),3(suicidal risk requires scheduled outpatient follow-up,no immediate intervention),4(suicidal risk requires immediate intervention, no hospitalization). 5( suicidal risk requires immediate hospitalization, no suicide precautions),6 (suicide risk requires hospitalization with suicide precautions). LOCF approach used for missing visit data in ITT LOCF efficacy analyses.
Baseline (Day 1-predose) to Day 2
Change From Baseline to Double-blind Phase-Endpoint (Day 25) Suicide Ideation and Behavior Assessment Tool (SIBAT)-Clinical Global Judgment of Suicide Risk (SIBAT CGJ-SR) Module 8 (Double-blind Phase)
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1-predose) to Double-blind Phase-Endpoint (Day 25)
SIBAT CGJ-SR: Module 8 operates like numerous other CGI severity scales used in other psychiatric studies. Changes in CGJ-SR designed to categorize clinically meaningful changes in clinician rated suicide risk from 'not at all suicidal' to 'participant is at imminent risk of suicide and immediate need for strong intervention (hospitalization with 24 hour 1:1 observation).' Patient scores for clinician-rated suicide risk: 0 (not suicidal); 1(occasional suicidal ideas, no intervention required);2(some clear suicidal ideas present),3(suicidal risk requires scheduled outpatient follow-up,no immediate intervention),4(suicidal risk requires immediate intervention, no hospitalization). 5( suicidal risk requires immediate hospitalization, no suicide precautions),6 (suicide risk requires hospitalization with suicide precautions). LOCF approach used for missing visit data in ITT LOCF efficacy analyses. Last post baseline observation was carried forward as "End Point" for the double-blind phase.
Baseline (Day 1-predose) to Double-blind Phase-Endpoint (Day 25)
Change From Baseline to Follow-up Phase-Endpoint (Day 81) in Suicide Ideation and Behavior Assessment Tool (SIBAT)-Clinical Global Judgment of Suicide Risk Score (Follow-up Phase)
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1-predose) to Follow-up Phase-Endpoint (Day 81)
SIBAT CGJ-SR: Module 8 operates like numerous other CGI severity scales used in other psychiatric studies. Changes in CGJ-SR designed to categorize clinically meaningful changes in clinician rated suicide risk from 'not at all suicidal' to 'participant is at imminent risk of suicide and immediate need for strong intervention (hospitalization with 24 hour 1:1 observation).' Patient scores for clinician-rated suicide risk: 0 (not suicidal); 1(occasional suicidal ideas, no intervention required);2(some clear suicidal ideas present),3(suicidal risk requires scheduled outpatient follow-up,no immediate intervention),4(suicidal risk requires immediate intervention, no hospitalization). 5( suicidal risk requires immediate hospitalization, no suicide precautions),6 (suicide risk requires hospitalization with suicide precautions). LOCF approach used for missing visit data in ITT LOCF efficacy analyses. Last post baseline observation was carried forward as "End Point" for follow up phase.
Baseline (Day 1-predose) to Follow-up Phase-Endpoint (Day 81)
Change From Baseline to Day 1: 4- Hours Postdose in SIBAT-Patient-Reported Global Assessment of Suicide Risk (Module 6) Score (Double-blind Phase)
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1-predose) to Day 1: 4-hours postdose
SIBAT was specifically developed to measure rapid change in suicidality, based on concerns that existing scales such as Beck Scale for Suicidal Ideation (BSS) are not designed to discriminate differences associated with rapid change. Patient-rated section includes following modules: Module 1 (M-1)(demographic information,suicide history), M-2(current suicidal thinking),M-3 (protective factors), M-4 (suicide behavior),M-5(suicide risk),M-6(suicide-implicit association test).Patient-reported global assessment of suicide risk summarizes patient's judgment of suicide risk (Module 6). Scores: 0(None), 1(Very weak), 2(Weak), 3(Moderately weak), 4(Mild), 5(Moderate), 6 (Moderately strong), 7(Strong), 8(Extremely strong), 9(Extremely strong,constant). Negative change in score indicates improvement. LOCF approach used for missing visit data in the ITT LOCF efficacy analyses.
Baseline (Day 1-predose) to Day 1: 4-hours postdose
Change From Baseline to Day 2 in Suicide Ideation and Behavior Assessment Tool Patient-Reported Global Assessment of Suicide Risk (Module 6) Score (Double-blind Phase)
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1-predose) to Day 2
SIBAT was specifically developed to measure rapid change in suicidality, based on concerns that existing scales such as BSS are not designed to discriminate differences associated with rapid change. Patient-rated section includes following modules: Module 1 (M-1)(demographic information,suicide history), M-2(current suicidal thinking),M-3 (protective factors), M-4 (suicide behavior),M-5(suicide risk),M-6(suicide-implicit association test).Patient-reported global assessment of suicide risk summarizes patient's judgment of suicide risk (Module 6). Scores: 0(None), 1(Very weak), 2(Weak), 3(Moderately weak), 4(Mild), 5(Moderate), 6 (Moderately strong), 7(Strong), 8(Extremely strong), 9(Extremely strong,constant). Negative change in score indicates improvement. LOCF approach used for missing visit data in the ITT LOCF efficacy analyses.
Baseline (Day 1-predose) to Day 2
Change From Baseline to Double Blind Phase-Endpoint (Day 25) in Suicide Ideation and Behavior Assessment Tool Patient-Reported Global Assessment of Suicide Risk (Module 6) Score (Double-blind Phase)
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1-predose) to Double-blind Phase-Endpoint (Day 25)
SIBAT was specifically developed to measure rapid change in suicidality, based on concerns that existing scales such as BSS are not designed to discriminate differences associated with rapid change. Patient-rated section includes following modules: Module 1 (M-1)(demographic information,suicide history), M-2(current suicidal thinking),M-3 (protective factors), M-4 (suicide behavior),M-5(suicide risk),M-6(suicide-implicit association test).Patient-reported global assessment of suicide risk summarizes patient's judgment of suicide risk (Module 6). Scores: 0(None), 1(Very weak), 2(Weak), 3(Moderately weak), 4(Mild), 5(Moderate), 6 (Moderately strong), 7(Strong), 8(Extremely strong), 9(Extremely strong,constant). Negative change in score indicates improvement. LOCF approach used for missing visit data in the ITT LOCF efficacy analyses. Last post baseline observation was carried forward as "End Point" for double-blind phase.
Baseline (Day 1-predose) to Double-blind Phase-Endpoint (Day 25)
Change From Baseline to Follow-up Phase-Endpoint (Day 81) in Suicide Ideation and Behavior Assessment Tool Patient-Reported Global Assessment of Suicide Risk (Module 6) Score (Follow-up Phase)
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1-predose) to Follow-up Phase Endpoint (Day 81)
SIBAT was specifically developed to measure rapid change in suicidality, based on concerns that existing scales such as BSS are not designed to discriminate differences associated with rapid change. Patient-rated section includes following modules: Module 1 (M-1)(demographic information,suicide history), M-2(current suicidal thinking),M-3 (protective factors), M-4 (suicide behavior),M-5(suicide risk),M-6(suicide-implicit association test).Patient-reported global assessment of suicide risk summarizes patient's judgment of suicide risk (Module 6). Scores: 0(None), 1(Very weak), 2(Weak), 3(Moderately weak), 4(Mild), 5(Moderate), 6 (Moderately strong), 7(Strong), 8(Extremely strong), 9(Extremely strong,constant). Negative change in score indicates improvement. LOCF approach used for missing visit data in ITT LOCF efficacy analyses, last post baseline observation was carried forward as the "End Point" follow up phase.
Baseline (Day 1-predose) to Follow-up Phase Endpoint (Day 81)
Change From Baseline to Day 1: 4-Hours Postdose in Beck Scale for Suicidal Ideation (BSS) Total Score (Double-blind Phase)
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1-predose) to Day 1: 4-hours postdose
BSS is 21-item self-reported instrument to detect and measure severity of suicidal ideation. BSS measures broad spectrum of attitudes and behaviors associated with risk of suicide. Items in scale assess respondent's suicidal plans, deterrents to suicide, level of openness to revealing suicidal thoughts. First 19 items of scale measure gradations of severity of suicidal wishes,attitude, plans.Statements reflect increasing gradations of this severity,are scored from 0 to 2. Final two items ask about number of suicide attempts, seriousness of intention to die associated with last attempt,they are not used in calculating BSS total score. Total BSS score represents severity of suicide ideation, calculated by summing ratings of first 19 items;total score ranges from 0 to 38, with higher score representing greater suicide ideation. LOCF approach used for missing visit data in ITT LOCF efficacy analyses.
Baseline (Day 1-predose) to Day 1: 4-hours postdose
Change From Baseline to Day 2 in Beck Scale for Suicidal Ideation (BSS) Total Score (Double-blind Phase)
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1-predose) to Day 2
BSS is 21-item self-reported instrument to detect and measure severity of suicidal ideation. BSS measures broad spectrum of attitudes and behaviors associated with risk of suicide. Items in scale assess respondent's suicidal plans, deterrents to suicide,level of openness to revealing suicidal thoughts. First 19 items of scale measure gradations of severity of suicidal wishes, attitude, plans.Statements reflect increasing gradations of this severity,are scored from 0 to 2. Final two items ask about number of suicide attempts, seriousness of intention to die associated with last attempt,they are not used in calculating BSS total score. Total BSS score represents severity of suicide ideation, calculated by summing ratings of first 19 items;total score ranges from 0 to 38, with higher score representing greater suicide ideation. LOCF approach used for missing visit data in ITT LOCF efficacy analyses.
Baseline (Day 1-predose) to Day 2
Change From Baseline to Double-blind Phase-Endpoint (Day 25) in Beck Scale for Suicidal Ideation Total Score (Double-blind Phase)
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1-predose) to Double-blind Phase-endpoint (Day 25)
BSS is 21-item self-reported instrument to detect and measure severity of suicidal ideation.BSS measures broad spectrum of attitudes and behaviors associated with risk of suicide. Items in scale assess respondent's suicidal plans, deterrents to suicide, level of openness to revealing suicidal thoughts. First 19 items of scale measure gradations of severity of suicidal wishes, attitude, plans.Statements reflect increasing gradations of this severity,are scored from 0 to 2. Final two items ask about number of suicide attempts, seriousness of intention to die associated with last attempt,they are not used in calculating BSS total score. Total BSS score represents severity of suicide ideation, calculated by summing ratings of first 19 items;total score ranges from 0 to 38, with higher score representing greater suicide ideation. LOCF approach used for missing visit data in ITT LOCF efficacy analyses. Last post baseline observation was carried forward as "End Point" for double-blind phase.
Baseline (Day 1-predose) to Double-blind Phase-endpoint (Day 25)
Change From Baseline to Follow-up Phase-Endpoint (Day 81) in Beck Scale for Suicidal Ideation Total Score (Follow-up Phase)
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1-predose) to Follow-up Phase-Endpoint (Day 81)
BSS is 21-item self-reported instrument to detect and measure severity of suicidal ideation. BSS measures broad spectrum of attitudes and behaviors associated with risk of suicide. Items in scale assess respondent's suicidal plans, deterrents to suicide, level of openness to revealing suicidal thoughts. First 19 items of scale measure gradations of severity of suicidal wishes, attitude, plans.Statements reflect increasing gradations of this severity,are scored from 0 to 2. Final two items ask about number of suicide attempts, seriousness of intention to die associated with last attempt,they are not used in calculating BSS total score. Total BSS score represents severity of suicide ideation, calculated by summing ratings of first 19 items;total score ranges from 0 to 38, with higher score representing greater suicide ideation. LOCF approach used for missing visit data in ITT LOCF efficacy analyses, last post baseline observation was carried forward as the "End Point" follow up phase.
Baseline (Day 1-predose) to Follow-up Phase-Endpoint (Day 81)
Change From Baseline to Day 1: 4-Hours Postdose in Beck Hopelessness Scale (BHS) Total Score (Double-blind Phase)
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1-predose) to Day 1: 4-hours Postdose
BHS is paper-based self-reported measure to assess one's level of negative expectations or pessimism regarding future. Consists of 20 true-false items that examine the respondent's attitude over past week by either endorsing a pessimistic statement or denying an optimistic statement; 9 are keyed false and 11 are keyed true. Items fall within 3 domains: feelings about future; loss of motivation; future expectations. each response is assigned a score of 0 or 1. Total BHS score is sum of item responses, with range from 0 to 20, with a higher score representing higher level of hopelessness. Total scores that range from 0 to 3 are (normal range), scores 4 to 8 (mild hopelessness, scores 9 to 14 (moderate hopelessness), scores <14 (severe hopelessness). Negative change in score indicates improvement. The LOCF approach was used for missing visit data in the ITT LOCF efficacy analyses.
Baseline (Day 1-predose) to Day 1: 4-hours Postdose
Change From Baseline to Double-blind Phase-Endpoint (Day 25) in Beck Hopelessness Scale Total Score (Double-blind Phase)
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1-predose) to Double-blind Phase-Endpoint (Day 25)
BHS is paper-based self-reported measure to assess one's level of negative expectations or pessimism regarding future. Consists of 20 true-false items that examine the respondent's attitude over past week by either endorsing a pessimistic statement or denying an optimistic statement; 9 are keyed false and 11 are keyed true. Items fall within 3 domains: feelings about future; loss of motivation; future expectations. each response is assigned a score of 0 or 1. Total BHS score is sum of item responses, with range from 0 to 20, with a higher score representing higher level of hopelessness. Total scores that range from 0 to 3 are (normal range), scores 4 to 8 (mild hopelessness, scores 9 to 14 (moderate hopelessness), scores <14 (severe hopelessness). Negative change in score indicates improvement. The LOCF approach was used for missing visit data in the ITT LOCF efficacy analyses. The last post baseline observation was carried forward as the "End Point" for the double-blind phase.
Baseline (Day 1-predose) to Double-blind Phase-Endpoint (Day 25)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Janssen Research & Development, LLC

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: Janssen Research & Development, LLC Clinical Trial, Janssen Research & Development, LLC

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
May 23, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
February 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
February 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 6, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 6, 2014

First Posted (Estimated)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
May 7, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 29, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 25, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • CR103162
  • ESKETINSUI2001 (Other Identifier: Janssen Research & Development, LLC)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings