The Effect of Bedside Ultrasound Assistance on the Proportion of Successful Infant Spinal Taps

August 1, 2017 updated by: Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The Effect of Bedside Ultrasound Assistance on the Proportion of Successful Infant Lumbar Punctures in a Pediatric Emergency Department: A Randomized Controlled Trial

The reported rate of unsuccessful spinal taps in children, especially young infants, is high. Our hypothesis is that ultrasound assistance can improve the success rate of spinal taps.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The reported rate of unsuccessful spinal taps in children is high. At the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP), quality improvement data demonstrates a failure rate of ~40-50%. Research has shown that bedside ultrasound can improve visualization and improve the success rate of spinal taps. Increasing the proportion of successful spinal taps in the emergency department could significantly reduce the rate of unnecessary hospitalizations, additional interventional procedures and antibiotic use. Our objective is to determine if bedside ultrasound-assisted site marking will increase the proportion of first attempt successful spinal taps. This will be a prospective, randomized controlled study that will take place over the course of 18 months with the goal to recruit a sample of approximately 128 patients. We will recruit subjects from the CHOP Emergency Department. The patients will be randomized into an ultrasound-assisted group versus a non-ultrasound-assisted group. Our hypothesis is that bedside ultrasound-assisted site marking will increase the number of successful spinal taps.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
128

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Pennsylvania
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19104
        • Children's Hospital of Philadelphia Emergency Department

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

No older than 6 months (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Less than or equal to six months of age
  • Plan for diagnostic or therapeutic lumbar puncture as per front line clinician
  • Availability of a study sonographer to perform bedside ultrasound

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known spinal cord abnormality (e.g., tethered cord, spina bifida)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: US-Assisted site marking for Lumbar Punctures (LP)
Mindray M7 Ultrasound marking
Procedure: Bedside Ultrasound-Assisted Site Marking
Patient will receive a bedside ultrasound-assisted site marking of the most appropriate site for lumbar puncture prior to the clinician completing the spinal tap using Mindray M7 Ultrasound.
Other Names:
  • Mindray M7 Ultrasound
Device: Mindray M7 Ultrasound
Patient will receive a bedside ultrasound exam of the most appropriate site for lumbar puncture prior to the clinician completing the spinal tap
Other Names:
  • M7/M7T Diagnostic Ultrasound
Placebo Comparator: Routine lumbar puncture
These patients will receive no ultrasound-assisted site marking prior to lumbar puncture; The patients will simply have a "standard-of-care" spinal tap performed by the clinician
Procedure: Routine lumbar puncture
Lumbar puncture will be performed per routine standard of care

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Successful First Attempt Lumbar Punctures in the Ultrasound-assisted Group as Compared to the Non-ultrasound Assisted Group
Time Frame: 30 minutes
First attempt success in ultrasound-assisted group compared to first attempt success in non-ultrasound assisted group
30 minutes

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Overall Success of Lumbar Punctures in the Ultrasound-assisted Group Versus the Non-ultrasound-assisted Group
Time Frame: 30 minutes
Overall success of lumbar punctures (within 3 attempts) in the non-ultrasound-assisted group compared to the ultrasound-assisted group
30 minutes
Length of Hospitalization in Ultrasound-assisted Lumbar Puncture Patients Versus Non-ultrasound-assisted Patients
Time Frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of the hospital stay, an expected average of 2 days
If a lumbar puncture is not successful, this may lead to a longer hospitalization than necessary until a lumbar puncture can be completed (with interventional radiology or other resources). According to our hypothesis, we believe that ultrasound assistance will increase the proportion of successful lumbar punctures, and therefore, decrease the length of unnecessary hospitalization.
Participants will be followed for the duration of the hospital stay, an expected average of 2 days
Length of Antibiotic Use in Ultrasound-assisted Lumbar Puncture Patients Versus Non-ultrasound-assisted Patients
Time Frame: Participants will be followed until discontinuation of antibiotics, an expected average of 2 days
If a lumbar puncture is not successful, this may lead to unnecessary (prophylactic) antibiotic use until a lumbar puncture can be completed (with interventional radiology or other resources) to rule out meningitis. According to our hypothesis, we believe that ultrasound assistance will increase the proportion of successful lumbar punctures, and therefore, decrease the length of unnecessary antibiotics.
Participants will be followed until discontinuation of antibiotics, an expected average of 2 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Aaron E Chen, MD, CHOP

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
May 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
February 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
January 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 2, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 6, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
May 7, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 31, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 1, 2017

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 13-010667

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings