Adhese One F Upgrade in Direct Filling Therapy
Clinical Evaluation of AdheSE One F Upgrade in Direct Filling Therapy
Investigation on the clinical performance of a new dental adhesive when used in direct filling therapy after phosphoric acid etching.
Hypothesis: The new adhesive shows an acceptable clinical performance and allows a good filling quality.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- indication for class I or II filling
- max. 2 restorations per patient
- vital teeth
- sufficient language skills
Exclusion Criteria:
- dry working field cannot be established
- if the patient is known to be allergic to any of the materials' ingredients
- severe systemic diseases
- pregnancy
- non-vital or pulpitic teeth
- indication for indirect restoration
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Adhese One F Upgrade
Adhese One F Upgrade (AOFU) is administered after phosphoric acid etching (etch-and-rinse protocol).
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Clinical Success
Time Frame: 1 week
|
Clinical success is defined as no postoperative hypersensitivity and no loss of the restoration.
|
1 week
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Clinical Quality
Time Frame: 3 years
|
The clinical quality of the restorations will be evaluated according to semi-quantitative clinical evaluation (SQUACE) criteria and compared at all time points and at the end of the study. SQUACE is a published semi-quantitative method to evaluate the clinical success of dental restorations that is based on the commonly used USPHS criteria. The quality of the restoration is rated according to the SQUACE scale and classified as acceptable (patients with satisfactory clinical outcome) or not acceptable (patients with unsatisfactory clinical outcome). |
3 years
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Arnd Peschke, Dr., Ivoclar Vivadent AG
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimated)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- AOFU 2012
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.