Using Biomarkers to Optimize Antibiotic Strategies in Sepsis
Southeastern Pennsylvania Adult and Pediatric Prevention Epicenter Network - Randomized Control Trial
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Pennsylvania
-
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19104
- Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania - Medical Intensive Care Unit
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
SIRS Criteria
SIRS is considered to be present when patients have more than one of the following clinical findings:
- body temperature >38°C or <36°C
- heart rate >90 min-1
- respiratory rate of >20 min-1 or a Paco2 of <32 mm Hg
- and a white blood cell count of >12,000 cells µL-1 or <4,000 µL-1
- new empiric antibiotic therapy is initiated, indicating the suspicion of infection. Accepted criteria for SIRS will be used for the Medical Intensive Care Unit and Surgical Intensive Care Unit populations, with appropriate age-specific vital signs definitions to help make the definitions relevant for the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit population.
Exclusion Criteria:
- a code status of "do not resuscitate"
- absence of initiation or expansion of antibiotic therapy despite meeting criteria for sepsis
- presence of an immunocompromising condition.
An immunocompromising condition will be defined as one of the following:
- human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection with a t-helper cell (CD4) count <200 cell/mm3; 2) immunosuppressive therapy after organ transplantation
- neutropenia (<500 neutrophils/mm3)
- active chemotherapy within the 3 months preceding eligibility or
- diagnosis of cystic fibrosis.
These criteria all represent conditions in which antibiotic use is much less likely to be decreased regardless of the results of a biomarker and are consistent with exclusion criteria used in past studies of the impact of biomarkers.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
No Intervention: Observational
9 blood biomarkers (including C reactive protein and Procalcitonin) will be assessed across 3 days.
Results will not be shared with the subject's medical team.
At 3 days, the definitive diagnosis of infection will be determined using Center for Disease Control (CDC) criteria; this will serve as the gold standard for determining biomarker test characteristics.
Additional data to collect: demographics, comorbidities, medication use (like antibiotics), lab cultures, x-rays, sepsis resolution, length of hospital stay, and ultimate outcome (i.e., discharge, death).
Phase I will identify the biomarker(s) providing the greatest negative predictive value in identifying patients at very low likelihood bacterial infection.
|
|
|
Experimental: Biomarker Algorithm Intervention
The Algorithm arm is equivalent to the intervention. Biomarker algorithm along with the patient's biomarker assay results will be given to clinical team to assist in deciding to continue antibiotics. The intervention will consist of using the biomarker identified as useful in Phase I to compile an algorithm along containing the patient's biomarker assay results and providing this as additional information for a clinical team consider using to assist in deciding to continue antibiotics. Biomarker algorithms may be different for adult versus pediatric patients, and across different types of ICUs. |
The intervention will consist of using the biomarker identified as useful in Phase I to compile an algorithm along containing the patient's biomarker assay results and providing this as additional information for a clinical team consider using to assist in deciding to continue antibiotics.
Biomarker algorithms may be different for adult versus pediatric patients, and across different types of ICUs.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Duration of antibiotic therapy started upon enrollment for presumed sepsis
Time Frame: Two years
|
The primary outcome is the duration of antibiotic treatment after enrollment, expressed in days.
This variable will focus specifically on the antibiotic agents given for the episode of presumed sepsis for which the patient was included in the study.
|
Two years
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Subject's Final Disposition
Time Frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 6 days
|
This includes assessing ICU mortality, hospital mortality, or hospital discharge as an ultimate outcome.
|
Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 6 days
|
Other Outcome Measures
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Length of stay
Time Frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 6 days
|
A secondary outcome of length of stay both in the Intensive Care Unit as well as total hospital stay after enrollment will be assessed.
|
Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 6 days
|
|
Clinical Cure
Time Frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 6 days
|
This secondary outcome measure is defined as resolution of sepsis.
Clinical signs and symptoms present at the time of enrollment as well as the presence in any clinical cultures of antimicrobial resistant organisms not present prior to enrollment will be ascertained.
|
Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 6 days
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Ebbing Lautenbach, MD,MPH,MSCE, Univeristy of Pennsylvania
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimated)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 813623
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.