Budesonide Effervescent Tablets vs. Viscous Budesonide Suspension vs. Placebo in Eosinophilic Esophagitis

January 20, 2016 updated by: Dr. Falk Pharma GmbH

Double-blind, Double-dummy, Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Phase IIa Study on the Efficacy and Tolerability of a 14-day Treatment With Budesonide Effervescent Tablets vs. Viscous Budesonide Suspension vs. Placebo in Patients With Eosinophilic Esophagitis

The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy of a low and high dose of a budesonide effervescent tablet and oral viscous budesonide suspension vs. placebo for the induction treatment of active eosinophilic esophagitis.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
76

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Germany
      • Hamburg, Germany, 20249
        • Center for Digestive Diseases Eppendorf

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 71 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Major Inclusion Criteria:

  • Signed informed consent
  • Male or female patients, 18 to 75 years of age
  • Confirmed clinicopathological diagnosis of EoE according to established diagnostic criteria:

(A) Clinical symptoms of esophageal dysfunction (B) Peak eosinophils ≥ 15 in at least 1 high-power field (hpf)

- Active symptomatic and histological EoE at baseline

Major Exclusion Criteria:

  • Clinically and endoscopically suspicion for gastroesophageal reflux disease, achalasia, or sklerodermia
  • Gastroesophageal reflux disease and PPI-responsive esophageal eosinophilia
  • Other clinical evident causes than EoE for esophageal eosinophilia
  • Any concomitant esophageal disease and relevant gastro-intestinal disease (celiac disease, inflammatory bowel disease, oropharyngeal or esophageal bacterial, viral, or fungal infection)
  • Any relevant systemic disease (e.g., AIDS, active tuberculosis)
  • Abnormal hepatic function at screening visit, liver cirrhosis, or portal hypertension
  • Abnormal renal function at screening
  • History of cancer in the last five years (except for non-metastatic cancers, e.g., basalioma)
  • History of esophageal surgery at any time or of esophageal dilation procedures within the last 8 weeks prior to screening visit
  • Upper gastrointestinal bleeding within 8 weeks prior to screening visit
  • Concomitant, or within the 4 weeks prior to screening visit, treatment with systemic therapies for any reason that may affect assessment of primary and secondary endpoints, i.e., systemic glucocorticoids, histamine antagonists, mast cell stabilizers, leukotriene receptor antagonists, biologics, or immunosuppressants
  • Concomitant, or within the 2 weeks prior to screening visit, treatment with topical therapies for any reason that may affect assessment of primary and secondary endpoints, i.e., topical glucocorticoids or inhaled sodium cromoglycate
  • Installation of dietary restrictions within 4 weeks prior to screening visit or during treatment
  • Intake of grapefruit containing food or beverages during the treatment with study medication
  • Known intolerance/hypersensitivity to study drug
  • Existing or intended pregnancy or breast-feeding

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Drug: Placebo
placebo tablet twice daily AND 5ml placebo suspension twice daily
Experimental: Low dose budesonide tablet
Drug: low dose budesonide tablet
1mg budesonide tablet twice daily AND 5ml placebo suspension twice daily
Other Names:
  • BET 1mg BID
Experimental: High dose budesonide tablet
Drug: high dose budesonide tablet
2mg budesonide tablet twice daily AND 5ml placebo suspension twice daily
Other Names:
  • BET 2mg BID
Experimental: High dose budesonide suspension
Drug: high dose budesonide suspension
placebo tablet twice daily AND 5ml [0.4mg budesonide/ml] suspension twice daily
Other Names:
  • BVS 2mg BID

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Rate of histological remission
Time Frame: 2 weeks (LOCF)
2 weeks (LOCF)
Change in the mean numbers of eos
Time Frame: 2 weeks (LOCF)
2 weeks (LOCF)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Change in the mean numbers of eos
Time Frame: 2 weeks (LOCF)
2 weeks (LOCF)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Dr. Falk Pharma GmbH

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: Ralph Mueller, PhD, Dr. Falk Pharma GmbH

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
April 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
May 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
October 29, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 30, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
October 31, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
January 21, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 20, 2016

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
January 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • BUU-2/EEA
  • 2009-016692-29 (EudraCT Number)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings