Effectiveness of Pediatric Resuscitation (EPR)
Quality of Chest Compressions During 8 Min of Single-rescuer Pediatric Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation With Five Different CPR Feedback Devices. Randomised Crossover Manikin Trial
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Masovia
-
Warsaw, Masovia, Poland, 03-122
- Recruiting
- International Institute of Rescue Research and Education
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- give voluntary consent to participate in the study
- medical profession (paramedics, nurses, physicians) or medical students (nurses, paramedics, physicians)
Exclusion Criteria:
- not meet the above criteria
- wrist or low back diseases
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: With feedback
Participants compress the chest of the manikin with CPR feedback device.
|
Standard basic life support = chest compressions without any feedback device (manual resuscitation)
Chest compressions without CPR feedback device (manual resuscitation)
|
|
Experimental: Without feedback
Participants compress the chest of the manikin without CPR feedback device
|
Standard basic life support = chest compressions without any feedback device (manual resuscitation)
Chest compressions without CPR feedback device (manual resuscitation)
Feedback device - 1
Feedback device - 2
Feedback device - 3
Feedback device - 4
Feedback devices - 5
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Effective compressions was defined as compression with correct depth (40-50mm), correct hand position and complete decompressions
Time Frame: 1 month
|
effective compressions was defined as compression with correct depth (40-50mm), correct hand position and complete decompressions
|
1 month
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Chest compression depth
Time Frame: 1 month
|
To measure chest compression depth during 8 minutes.
Chest compression depth will be measured using the software connected to the manikin and computer
|
1 month
|
|
Chest compression rate
Time Frame: 1 month
|
To measure the chest compression rate during 8 minutes.
Chest compression rate will be measured using the software connected to the manikin and computer
|
1 month
|
|
effective compressions ratio was defined as effective compressions [%] multiplied by flow time [%]
Time Frame: 1 month
|
effective compressions ratio was defined as effective compressions [%] multiplied by flow time [%]
|
1 month
|
|
Flow time was defined as the sum of all periods during which chest compressions were performed
Time Frame: 1 month
|
flow time was defined as the sum of all periods during which chest compressions were performed.
|
1 month
|
|
absolute hands-off time was defined as the sum of all periods without chest compressions or ventilation
Time Frame: 1 month
|
absolute hands-off time (HOT) was defined as the sum of all periods without chest compressions or ventilation
|
1 month
|
|
VAS (visual analogue scale)
Time Frame: 1 month
|
after having completed the 8 min testing period, the study participants were asked how challenging they had experienced standard BLS or resuscitation which the respective feedback device.
answers were rated on a 10-point Lickert scale (most difficult = 1 to easiest = 10)
|
1 month
|
|
Prefered CPR device
Time Frame: 1 month
|
after having completed the 8 min testing period, the study participants were asked how chellenging whitch method they would preferred.
answers were rated on a 10-point Lickert scale (lower preferred = 1 to most preferred = 10)
|
1 month
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Andrzej Kurowski, Institute of Cardiology
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- CPR/2014/06
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.