Prospective Study of Thoracolumbar Spinal Fusion Graft (BMAC)

April 27, 2026 updated by: NYU Langone Health

Prospective Study of Thoracolumbar Spinal Fusion Graft Efficacy: Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate Versus Iliac Crest Bone Graft

This study is a single-center, prospective randomized clinical study intended to compare and evaluate the efficacy of subjects who are treated with bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) and allograft to iliac crest bone grafts (ICBG) during posterior lumbar/lumbosacral spinal fusion.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Subjects who are candidates for posterior lumbar or lumbosacral spinal fusion without anterior interbody support will be screened for inclusion in the study. Participants will be enrolled and randomized to either the BMAC + allograft or ICBG group. An enrollment ratio of two BMAC + allograft to one ICBG subject (2:1) for up to a total of 40 subjects will be enrolled in the study which also accounts for failed screening subjects. The study will determine and compare differences in fusion rate and health related quality of life parameters at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years postoperatively.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
17

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10003
        • NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases
      • New York, New York, United States, 10016
        • Center for Musculoskeletal Care (CMC)
      • Westbury, New York, United States, 11590
        • NY Spine Institute

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Must be 18 years old or older
  • Scheduled for elective posterior spinal fusion of the thoracolumbar spine or lumbar spine with or without anterior interbody support
  • Failed at least 6 weeks of conservative care
  • ODI v2.1 score > 30%
  • No contraindication to BMAC (as per manufacturer)
  • Signed consent form

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Spondylolisthesis grade ≥ 3
  • Pagets disease, osteomalacia, or any metabolic bone disease
  • Use of medications that interfere with bone healing (chronic steroids)
  • Patient unlikely to comply with post-op schedule with physician
  • Recent history of chemical dependency
  • Participation in other investigational device trial(s) within past 30 days
  • Active malignancy
  • Pregnancy or planning to become pregnant
  • Direct involvement in execution of this protocol

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: BMAC & Allograft
Subjects will be treated with bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) and allograft during posterior lumbar/lumbosacral spinal fusion. During lumbar spine surgery, 12 teaspoons of bone marrow will be taken (aspirated) from one side of hip bone. This may be repeated on the other side of hip bone for a total of 12, 24, or 36 teaspoons of bone marrow total taken from your hip bone depending on the decision made by the surgeon. The bone marrow will then be concentrated with a machine for 15 minutes to a final volume of 2, 4, or 6 teaspoons of BMAC. BMAC will be combined with packed allograft bone chips using another machine to produce two or three constructed bone logs. The bone logs will be laid along the backside of the spine and between each vertebral body.
Procedure: BMAC & Allograft
Use of Allograft infused with adult stem cells from the bone marrow aspirate harvested from the iliac crest during posterior lumbar/lumbosacral spinal fusion.
Other Names:
  • Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate & Allograft
Active Comparator: Iliac Crest Bone Graft
Subjects who are in the Iliac Crest Bone Graft arm will be treated with Iliac crest bone grafts (ICBG) during posterior lumbar/lumbosacral spinal fusion. During lumbar spine surgery, the surgeon will make an incision to expose the iliac crest (hip bone), and cutting out the segments of the bone that will be needed, based on the decision of the surgeon. The bone chips will be laid along the backside of the spine and also between each vertebral body where the bone will fuse into place. When the bone becomes solid/fused, there is no movement in the fused spine.
Procedure: Iliac Crest Bone Graft
Use of iliac crest bone grafts (ICBG) during posterior lumbar/lumbosacral spinal fusion.
Other Names:
  • ICBG

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Spinal Fusion Grade at 1 Year Via CT Scan
Time Frame: Post Operative 1 Year
Spinal fusion grade refers to the assessment of how well vertebrae fuse together after surgery, often evaluated using imaging like CT scans or radiographs. Grades typically range from complete fusion (Grade I) to non-union or pseudarthrosis (Grade IV), indicating varying degrees of bone healing and stability.
Post Operative 1 Year
Change in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) Score
Time Frame: Pre-operative, Post Operative 1 Year
The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater disability. A score of 0% represents no disability, while a score of 100% represents complete disability. The ODI is often interpreted using categories: 0-20% (minimal disability), 21-40% (moderate disability), 41-60% (severe disability), 61-80% (crippling), and 81-100% (bedridden or functional impairment).
Pre-operative, Post Operative 1 Year
Short Form Health Survey (SF-12)
Time Frame: Pre-op, Post Operative 1 Year
The SF-12 is a shorter version of the SF-36, designed to assess health-related quality of life. Scores range from 0 to 100. Scores above 50 indicate better-than-average health-related quality of life for that component. Scores below 50 indicate below-average health-related quality of life.
Pre-op, Post Operative 1 Year
Change in Numeric Pain Rating Scale Score From Baseline (Pre-op) and 1 Year Post Operative
Time Frame: Pre-op, Post Operative 1 Year
The numeric pain rating scale (NRS) is a tool used to assess pain intensity, commonly using a scale of 0 to 10, where 0 indicates "no pain" and 10 represents the "worst pain imaginable"
Pre-op, Post Operative 1 Year
Length of Stay in Hospital, Measured in Days
Time Frame: Post Operative 1 Year
Post Operative 1 Year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
NYU Langone Health

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Peter Passias, MD, NYU School of Medicine

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
August 24, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
November 1, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
November 24, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
October 2, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 18, 2014

First Posted (Estimated)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
November 21, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 30, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 27, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 12-02411

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings