Induction Chemotherapy Followed by Chemoradiotherapy in Esophageal Cancer

May 30, 2020 updated by: Mian XI

A Phase II Randomized Trial of Induction Chemotherapy Versus no Induction Chemotherapy Followed by Definitive Chemoradiotherapy in Patients With Inoperable Thoracic Esophageal Cancer

The contribution of induction chemotherapy before definitive chemoradiotherapy is unknown. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and toxicity of induction chemotherapy followed by definitive chemoradiotherapy versus no induction chemotherapy in patients with inoperable thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

108 patients were randomized to receive no induction chemotherapy (IC, Arm A) or IC (Arm B) before definitive chemoradiotherapy in patients with inoperable thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Patients assigned to Arm B first received two cycles of 3-weekly schedule of IC, consisting of docetaxel 75 mg/m2 on day 1 and cisplatin 75 mg/m2 on day 1. The prescribed dose of radiotherapy is generally 50-60 Gy/25-28fr. The concomitant chemotherapy is docetaxel 20 mg/m2 on day 1, cisplatin 25 mg/m2 on day 1, repeated weekly during radiation.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
110

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • China
    • Guangdong
      • Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, 510060
        • Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Histologically confirmed squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus;
  2. Localized, nonmetastatic disease (T1-4, N0-1) confirmed by endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and CT scan (according to UICC TNM version 6);
  3. Absence of distant metastasis of solid organ;
  4. Not suitable for surgery (either for medical reasons or patient's choice);
  5. Age at diagnosis 18 to 70 years;
  6. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≤ 2
  7. No prior cancer therapy;
  8. No history of concomitant or previous malignancy;
  9. Hematologic function: WBC ≥ 4.0×109/L, PLT ≥ 80×109/L, Hb ≥ 10mg/dL;
  10. Renal function: Cr ≤ 1.25×UNL;
  11. Hepatic function: BIL ≤ 1.5×UNL, ALT/AST ≤ 2.5×UNL;
  12. Documented informed consent to participate in the trial.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Younger than 18 or older than 70 years of age;
  2. ECOG performance status of 3 or above;
  3. Other cancer history;
  4. Previous radiotherapy history;
  5. Subjects with distant metastases;
  6. Pregnancy or breast feeding. Women of childbearing age must use effective contraception;
  7. Serious cardiovascular disease (congestive heart failure, uncontrollable arrhythmia, unstable angina, myocardial infarction, serious heart valve disease, resistant hypertension);
  8. Evidence of bleeding diathesis or serious infection.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Concurrent chemoradiotherapy
Patients assigned to this Arm received concurrent chemoradiotherapy. The prescribed dose of radiotherapy is generally 50-60 Gy/25-28fr. The concomitant chemotherapy is docetaxel 20 mg/m2 on day 1, cisplatin 25 mg/m2 on day 1, repeated weekly during radiation.
Drug: Docetaxel
Include brand names, serial numbers and code names to improve search results on the ClinicalTrials.gov web site.
Other Names:
  • taxotere
Drug: Cisplatin
Include brand names, serial numbers and code names to improve search results on the ClinicalTrials.gov web site.
Other Names:
  • DDP
Radiation: Radiotherapy
definitive radiotherapy
Other Names:
  • radiation
Experimental: Induction chemotherapy plus chemoradiotherapy
Patients assigned to this Arm first received two cycles of 3-weekly schedule of IC before definitive chemoradiotherapy, consisting of docetaxel 75 mg/m2 on day 1 and cisplatin 75 mg/m2 on day 1. The prescribed dose of radiotherapy is generally 50-60 Gy/25-28fr. The concomitant chemotherapy is docetaxel 20 mg/m2 on day 1, cisplatin 25 mg/m2 on day 1, repeated weekly during radiation.
Drug: Docetaxel
Include brand names, serial numbers and code names to improve search results on the ClinicalTrials.gov web site.
Other Names:
  • taxotere
Drug: Cisplatin
Include brand names, serial numbers and code names to improve search results on the ClinicalTrials.gov web site.
Other Names:
  • DDP
Radiation: Radiotherapy
definitive radiotherapy
Other Names:
  • radiation

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
overall response rate (clinical complete response and partial response)
Time Frame: 3 months after chemoradiotherapy (plus or minus 7 days)
RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) criteria was used to determine the tumor response. Tumor response was evaluated 3 months after the completion of treatment based on barium esophagography, CT scans, and endoscopy with biopsies.
3 months after chemoradiotherapy (plus or minus 7 days)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall survival
Time Frame: 3 years
Three years follow-up from the enrollment to the date of death from any cause or date of lost follow-up
3 years
Progression-free survival
Time Frame: 3 years
From the date of randomization to the date of disease progression or last follow-up
3 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Mian XI

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Chair: Meng-Zhong Liu, MD, Sun Yat-sen University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
May 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
September 6, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
May 30, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 19, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 25, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 31, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
June 2, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 30, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • ICCRTEC

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings