Evaluation of Intraoperative Usage of Sentinella in Detecting Sentinel Lymph Nodes

April 3, 2017 updated by: Oncovision Inc
The aim of this study is to investigate whether the Sentinella camera improves intraoperative detection and removal of sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) when used in conjunction with standard detection methods. Of primary interest is whether the Sentinella camera identifies additional tumor-positive SLNs that are missed using traditional imaging techniques. Other outcomes related to the standard of care use of the Sentinella camera may also be assessed.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Sentinella is an FDA-approved, high-resolution, portable gamma camera that gives valuable visual guidance to surgeons in certain types of cancer surgeries where no, or only limited, visual guidance was possible previously. The significance of this new aid is the improved possibility of locating and removing all lymph nodes that drain directly from tumors-so-called "SLNs"-in order to accurately assess both the staging of the cancer as well as the best possible operative and post-operative treatment. Sentinella can confirm that no significant lymph nodes are missed and document this "clean field" on the patient's permanent record.

Usually, there is more than one SLN. False-negative SLN biopsy results may impair patient outcome for several reasons: missed nodes might lead to recurrence that can be potentially difficult to treat on occasions, involved nodes may be a potential secondary source of distant metastases, and understaging affects decisions about systemic therapy and specific radiation therapy. Missing SLNs is one of the main factors which increase the false-negative rates.

Sentinel node biopsy is undoubtedly the standard of care for breast cancer and melanoma because of the vital information the histological status of these nodes gives. Correct identification of these SLNs is challenging because of limitations of current preoperative imaging and the lack of visualization in the OR:

  • What appears to be a single node in a preoperative lymphoscintigraphy or SPECT can turn out to be 2 or more different nodes that are close together. This is due to relatively low spatial resolution of these technologies.
  • Structures can be "hidden" by other structures such as the principle tumor/injection site, making identification difficult or impossible. In these cases, Sentinella will discover the structure upon removal of the principle tumor and aid the surgeon in its removal.
  • Currently used gamma probes give only audible and non-recorded aid to surgeons and can easily miss structures when they are more than 2 cm deep in tissue.

Sentinella gives additional visual information to surgical teams that can improve patient outcomes. It does not replace, but rather compliments current standard procedures, and it offers precise documentation of each step of the procedure to be kept permanently on the patient's record.

  1. After standard injection of radiotracer and imaging are performed preoperatively, Sentinella can be used in the OR to identify the position of the structures and mark the skin for surgeon's reference.
  2. Before removal, Sentinella can be used to visualize and quantify the radioactivity of each structure. This information is stored for future reference.
  3. Upon removal of each structure, Sentinella can be used to verify ex-vivo the activity of the structure removed.
  4. After removal and verification of all the structures planned, Sentinella is used to confirm that no active structure is left in and to document the resulting "clean field"

The current standard of care for surgical SLN biopsy involves use of a gamma probe. In this study, the investigators will prospectively collect Sentinella images obtained during this standard of care procedure and compare and correlate the findings with other standard of care imaging studies, and treatment and outcome information.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
100

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • California
      • San Francisco, California, United States, 94115
        • California Pacific Medical Center - Pacific Campus

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All melanoma patients, with a Breslow thickness >1mm, who are seen at CPMC for sentinel node biopsy will be eligible to participate in this study provided that they have given consent.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Sentinella intraoperative use

Standard of care intraoperative protocol

  1. Localize SLN with the Gamma Probe for In vivo count
  2. Optional (time permitting during surgical prep). Image same SLN with Sentinella (Pre-incision)
  3. Surgically remove/excise localized SLN
  4. Ex vivo count - excised SLN with Gamma Probe
  5. In vivo background/roaming count with Gamma Probe
  6. Repeat step 1-5, until no SLNs are found with the Gamma Probe (negative reading)

Sentinella intraoperative imaging protocol

  1. Survey surgical field/Post-excision control with Sentinella for remaining SLNs
  2. If focal uptake seen in step 1, search for these occult SLNs with Gamma Probe and remove localized additional SLNs
  3. Record information on data sheet for each excised SLN with Gamma Probe and Sentinella
Device: Sentinella Intraoperative imaging protocol

There is a "holding" time of 15-20 minutes after the lymph node is removed during which the node is further dissected, examined and prepared for pathological analysis. This occurs before the procedure is completed in case the surgeon determines that further surgical exploration or tissue removal is required.

In this study, the investigators will use this holding time to collect images of the sentinel lymph node area using the Sentinella camera for this study. Therefore, participation in this study will not increase the subject's overall procedure time. However, if the Sentinella camera detects something that the standard imaging techniques have missed, such as an additional sentinel node, the surgeon will do further exploration and tissue removal as needed.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The percentage of patients for whom Sentinella detects additional tumor-positive SLNs.
Time Frame: 1 year
Primary endpoint The percentage of patients for whom Sentinella detects additional tumor-positive SLNs.
1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean percentage of SLNs detected using pre-operative lymphoscintigraphy and/or SPECT/CT
Time Frame: 1 Year
The mean percentage of excised SLNs among the total number of SLNs detected using preoperative lymphoscintigraphy and/or single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)/CT. This is to evaluate the percentage of intraoperatively found SLNs, which are preoperatively visualized by lymphoscintigraphy and/or SPECT/CT.
1 Year
Additional SLNs per patient found using Sentinella
Time Frame: 1 Year
The proportion of patients who have additional SLNs found and the mean number of additional SLNs found per patient. This is to evaluate in how many patients additional SLNs are found with Sentinella after negative gamma probe screening. (Label these additional nodes as: post-excision control/same location, near-injection-site, deeply located/low-uptake SLNs, etc.).
1 Year
Mean Sentinella imaging time
Time Frame: 1 Year
Mean time required to complete intraoperative imaging with Sentinella. (After the surgery, the total image acquisition time for that patient can be found on Sentinella's database.)
1 Year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Oncovision Inc

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
California Pacific Medical Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
March 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
March 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 7, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 9, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 15, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 5, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 3, 2017

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • SLN-USA-1

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings