Phase II Trial of TIL Following CCRT in Patients With Locoregionally Advanced NPC (TIL)

October 17, 2016 updated by: Hai-Qiang Mai,MD,PhD, Sun Yat-sen University

A Study of Adoptive Immunotherapy With Autologous Tumor Infiltrating Lymphocytes and Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

This is a Phase II trial to study the effectiveness and security of cisplatin concurrent chemoradiotherapy plus TIL versus cisplatin concurrent chemoradiotherapy only with IMRT in treating patients with locoregionally advanced high risk nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is endemic in Southern China and Southeast Asia. For locoregionally advanced NPC,especially for the high risk NPC (EB virus DNA ≥ 4000 copies/ml) ,the incidence of treatment failure is still high. Although concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) can improve the treatment outcomes of these patients, approximately 25% of locoregionally advanced NPCs relapse. Adjuvant chemotherapy or inducing chemotherapy addition to CCRT did not significantly improve patient survival compared to CCRT alone. Hence, there is an urgent need for novel therapies to improve disease-free survival and reduce treatment-related toxicity in patients.

Accumulating evidence shows that tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) selected for tumor recognition and greatly expanded in vitro are especially effective for treating cancer patients.The investigations phase I results showed that TILs following CCRT as a novel treatment strategy in locoregionally advanced NPC patients resulted in sustained anti-tumor activity and anti-EBV immune responses, associated with a good tolerance.

This is a Phase II trial to study the effectiveness and security of cisplatin CCRT plus TIL versus cisplatin CCRT only with IMRT in treating patients with locoregionally advanced high risk NPC.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
116

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • China
    • Guangdong
      • Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, 510060
        • Recruiting
        • Haiqiang Mai
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with newly histologically confirmed non-keratinizing nasopharyngeal carcinoma, including WHO II or III
  • Original clinical staged as T3-4N1-3 M0 or any T、N2-3M0（according to the 7th AJCC edition）
  • No evidence of distant metastasis (M0)
  • Plasm EB Virus DNA≥4000copies/ml
  • Male and no pregnant female
  • Satisfactory performance status: ECOG (Eastern Cooperative OncologyGroup) scale 0-1
  • WBC ≥ 4×109 /L and PLT ≥4×109 /L and HGB ≥90 g/L
  • With normal liver function test (ALT、AST ≤ 2.5×ULN, TBIL≤ 2.0×ULN)
  • With normal renal function test (Creatinine ≤ 1.5×ULN)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients have evidence of relapse or distant metastasis
  • Histologically confirmed keratinizing squamous cell carcinoma (WHO I)
  • Receiving radiotherapy or chemotherapy previously
  • The presence of uncontrolled life-threatening illness
  • Women of child-bearing potential who are pregnant or breastfeeding because of the potentially dangerous effects of the preparative chemotherapy on the fetus or infant.
  • Active systemic infections, coagulation disorders or other major medical illnesses of the cardiovascular, respiratory or immune system, myocardial infarction, cardiac arrhythmias, obstructive or restrictive pulmonary disease.
  • Any form of primary immunodeficiency (such as Severe Combined Immunodeficiency Disease).
  • Concurrent opportunistic infections (The experimental treatment being evaluated in this protocol depends on an intact immune system. Patients who have decreased immune competence may be less responsive to the experimental treatment and more susceptible to its toxicities).
  • Concurrent systemic steroid therapy
  • HIV positive
  • Suffered from other malignant tumors (except the cure of basal cell carcinoma or uterine cervical carcinoma in situ) previously

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Cisplatin+TIL
Cisplatin concurrent chemoradiotherapy(CCRT) combined with tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL)
Drug: Cisplatin+TIL
cisplatin 100mg/m2(every three weeks),D1,D22,D43 of radiotherapy,then TIL infusing following concurrent chemoradiotherapy
Other Names:
  • DDP
Active Comparator: Cisplatin
Cisplatin concurrent chemoradiotherapy(CCRT) only
Drug: Cisplatin
cisplatin 100mg/m2(every three weeks),D1,D22,D43 of radiotherapy only
Other Names:
  • DDP

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Progress-free survival
Time Frame: 3 years
Progress-free survival is calculated from the date of randomization to the date of the first progress at any site.
3 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Complete Response (CR)
Time Frame: after the completion of the chemoradiotherapy treatment (up to 9 weeks)
CR assessed by independent reviewers, according to the Modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) from the National Cancer Institute (NCI). Disease response evaluated after the completion of the chemoradiotherapy treatment. Complete response defined as the complete disappearance of the target and non-target lesion(s) identified at baseline after radiological evaluation by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) only.
after the completion of the chemoradiotherapy treatment (up to 9 weeks)
Overall Survival (OS)
Time Frame: 3 years
The OS was defined as the duration from the date of random assignment to the date of death from any cause or censored at the date of the last follow-up.
3 years
Locoregional Relapse-Free Survival (LRRF)
Time Frame: 3 years
The LRRFS is evaluated and calculated from the date of random assignment until the day of first locoregional relapse or until the date of the last follow-up visit.
3 years
Distant Metastasis-Free Survival (DMFS)
Time Frame: 3 years
The DMFS is evaluated and calculated from the date of random assignment until the day of first distant metastases or until the date of the last follow-up visit.
3 years
Determine the toxic effects in these patients.
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Patients will be monitored for clinical toxicity by standard NIH criteria. A time period of 4 weeks will constitute the time for clinical safety monitoring.
4 weeks
Determine the molecular expression of EBV DNA.
Time Frame: 12 weeks
The molecular expression responses of the patients, including their plasma EBV DNA load, IFN levels and the expansion of EBV-antigen specific T cells.
12 weeks
Determine the quality of life (QoL) of these regimens in these patients.
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Administration and Monitoring Patients will be evaluated in the clinic and eligibility and informed consent obtained. QoL was assessed using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire C30 (EORTCQLQ-C30) and EORTC QLQ Head and Neck.
4 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Sun Yat-sen University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: HaiQiang Mai, MD,PhD, Cancer center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
March 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
March 1, 2017

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
March 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 11, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 15, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 20, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
October 18, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 17, 2016

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
September 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • NPC and TIL

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

decided by the results

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

Clinical Trials on Cisplatin+TIL

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings