Soluble Fibrin for Diagnosing Pulmonary Embolism (SOFIE)

April 17, 2019 updated by: Diagnostica Stago R&D

Evaluation of Performances of Soluble Fibrin Assay for Diagnosing Pulmonary Embolism

The purpose of the study is to evaluate the performances of Soluble Fibrin for diagnosing Pulmonary Embolism. Secondary objective is to compare the diagnostic performances of the Soluble Fibrin Assay and the D-Dimer test.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Rationale. Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a major public health problem. D-dimer (D-Di) assay is useful to exclude the PE but not specific, requiring irradiating and expensive imaging tests. Preliminary results suggest that the Soluble Fibrin (SF) assay has a sensitivity comparable to the D-Di one, but a higher specificity and thus would limit the use of imaging tests.

Main objective. To compute the area under the ROC curve of the Soluble Fibrin assay for the diagnosis of PE and to assess the other diagnostic characteristics of the SF assay.

Patients. Inclusion criteria: patients 18 years or older, referred to the Emergency or Respiratory and Intensive Care Medicine Units, for clinically suspected of PE.

Exclusion criteria: pregnancy, contraindication to iodinated contrast media, anticoagulant drug at curative doses, patients with suspected PE during hospitalization and those for which the three month-follow up is impossible.

The protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee on March 2015. The study will be conducted in compliance with French regulations after ethics approval.

Reference algorithm. PE has to be confirmed or excluded by the reference algorithm combining clinical probability, D-Dimer, imaging tests and three month-follow up. Plasma D-dimer (D-Di) is measured in case of low clinical probability. Helical computed tomography (CT) is performed in case of either high clinical probability or positive D-dimer. Lower limb venous compression ultrasonography (US) is done only in case of negative CT in a patient with a high clinical probability. Patients will be classified in two groups, as having or not having PE on predefined criteria according to the recent guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology by physicians who will be unaware of the SF assay result.

SF Assays. Soluble fibrin is measured by one site, using prototype assays, on both citrated and heparinized blood samples taken at baseline. Staff in charge of the assays are not aware of the clinical and diagnosis decisions.

Statistical Analysis of results. It will be performed independently by the Clinical Research Unit of Georges Pompidou European Hospital. The ROC curve will be built, the area under the curve will be calculated with its confidence interval. The most suitable threshold will be determined from the curve. Then the diagnostic performances of SF assay will be calculated according to the usual calculations.

Number of participants required. Taking into account an estimated area of 0.9 to 0.95 on preliminary data, the inclusion of 500 patients with suspected PE will allow calculation of the area under the ROC curve with an accuracy of 5%. This number will also allow calculation of the diagnostic performances of the SF assay with sufficient accuracy.

Duration of the study. The study period is three months for each patient, the total duration of the study is 28 months.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
480

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • France
      • Paris, France, 75908
        • Georges Pompidou European hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Outpatients from Emergency or Respiratory and Intensive Care Medicine Units, in a French Hospital.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patients are aged 18 years or older,
  • outpatients from Emergency or Respiratory and Intensive Care Medicine Units,
  • clinically suspected of PE

Exclusion Criteria:

  • pregnant women,
  • patients with contraindication to iodinated contrast media,
  • patients treated with anticoagulants at curative doses,
  • patients with suspected PE during hospitalization
  • patients for which the three month-follow up is impossible.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Group with PE

The criteria for confirmation of PE are:

  • PE on spiral computed tomography (CT)
  • proximal deep vein thrombosis on ultrasound (US)
  • thromboembolic events objectively confirmed during the follow up
Other: Soluble Fibrin
Calculating the area under the ROC curve of the Soluble Fibrin assay for the diagnosis of PE before evaluating the diagnostic performance of the assay.
Group without PE

The criteria for exclusion of PE are:

  • low or moderate clinical probability and D-dimer ELISA <0.50 µg/mL or <10xage in patients older than 50 years and negative follow up
  • low and moderate clinical probability and negative CT and negative follow up
  • high clinical probability and negative CT, US and follow up.
Other: Soluble Fibrin
Calculating the area under the ROC curve of the Soluble Fibrin assay for the diagnosis of PE before evaluating the diagnostic performance of the assay.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Area under the ROC curve of the Soluble Fibrin for the diagnosis of PE
Time Frame: 28 months
The ROC curve will be built, the area under the curve will be calculated with its confidence interval. The most suitable threshold will be determined from the curve.
28 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Threshold of the Soluble Fibrin assays for the diagnosis of PE
Time Frame: 28 months
The most suitable threshold will be determined from the curve. Then the diagnosis performances of SF assays will be calculated according to the usual calculations.
28 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Diagnostica Stago R&D

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
European Georges Pompidou Hospital

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Guy Meyer, Ph D, Georges Pompidou European hospital
  • Study Director: Geneviève Contant, Ph D, Diagnostica Stago R&D

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 5, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 5, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
May 8, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 18, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 17, 2019

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • SOFIE 2015-A00094-45

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pulmonary Embolism (PE)

Clinical Trials on Soluble Fibrin

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings