Efficacy of Electroacupuncture (EA) for Women With Pure Stress Urinary Incontinence (SUI)

May 29, 2015 updated by: huanfang xu, Guang'anmen Hospital of China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences

A Pilot Randomized Placebo Controlled Trial of Electroacupuncture for Women With Pure Stress Urinary Incontinence

The purpose of this study is to preliminarily assess the efficacy of electroacupuncture (EA) for women with pure stress urinary incontinence (SUI).

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This was a pilot randomized, placebo controlled trial to preliminarily assess the efficacy of EA for women with pure SUI. Eligible participants were randomly assigned to EA group or sham EA group in a 1:1 ratio via a central randomization system by acupuncturists. Participants, outcome assessors and statisticians were blinded to treatment allocation. Subject blinding is achieved via the aid of adhesive pads used in both groups, placebo needle with a blunt tip and sham EA electrode lines. Assuming a two-sided alpha of 0.05, power of 90%, and a 20% drop-out, a sample size of 36 would be needed for each group. The investigators expanded the sample size to 80 cases (40 cases per group) to increase the reliability of the study. The investigators performed statistical analysis based on the intention-to-treat principle. All patients accepting randomization were included in the analysis. Missing data were filled in by the last observed value. Student t tests or Mann-Whitney U tests were used for the comparison of continuous variables; chi-square tests, Fisher's exact tests or Kruskal-Wallis H tests were used to compare categorical variables, as appropriate. For measures collected at two time points, paired t-tests or Wilcoxon signed rank tests were used as appropriate. A statistically significant difference was set at P<0.05.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
80

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • China
    • Beijing
      • Beijing, Beijing, China, 100053
        • Guang'anmen Hospital of China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Eligible women were 40 to 75 years of age, and met the clinical diagnosis recommendations of SUI by the International Consultation on Urological Diseases:

    • involuntary urine leakage on effort, exertion, sneezing or coughing which stopped when the stress ends;
    • visible involuntary leakage from the urethra synchronous with increased abdominal pressure, or a pad weight gain >1 g in 1-hour pad test;
    • without symptoms of urinary frequency and urgency.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Women were excluded from the study if they met any of the following criteria: *other type of urinary incontinence (UI) (urge, mixed, or overflow UI, etc);

    • symptomatic urinary tract infection;
    • ever received UI or pelvic surgery;
    • a severity of pelvic organ prolapse ≥ degree 2;
    • residual urinary volume >30 ml;
    • maximum flow rate ≤ 20 ml/s;
    • limited in walking, stairs climbing and running;
    • receiving specialized treatment for SUI, or taking medicine affecting bladder function;
    • serious cardiovascular, cerebral, liver, kidney, or psychiatric disease, diabetes, multiple system atrophy, injury of cauda equina, or myeleterosis;
    • being pregnant or breastfeeding;
    • with cardiac pacemaker, metal allergy or severe needle phobia;
    • unlike to give written formed consent.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: EA group
Other: EA
When acupuncturing, adhesive pads were first pasted on acupoints after sterilization in either group. In EA group, participants were needled at bilateral BL33 at an angle of 30 to 45 degree inward and downward, and at bilateral BL35 slightly toward upside and outside, to a depth of 50 to 60 mm using acupuncture needles of size 0.30×75 mm. Needles were then lifted, thrusted and twirled evenly for 3 times. Paired electrodes of EA apparatus were attached transversely to bilateral BL33 and BL35 (using real electrodes) respectively, with a continuous wave of 50 Hz and a current intensity of 1-5 milliampere (mA) for 30 min. Participants were treated with EA 3 sessions a week on alternate days for 6 successive weeks.
Placebo Comparator: Sham EA group
Other: sham EA
When acupuncturing, adhesive pads were first pasted on acupoints after sterilization in either group. In sham EA group, participants were needled at sham BL33 and sham BL35, which were about 20 mm lateral to BL33 and BL35, respectively, with blunt needle tips piercing adhesive pads and not piercing the surface of the skin, using placebo needles of size 0.30×25 mm. Needles were then lifted, thrusted and twirled evenly for 3 times. Paired electrodes of EA apparatus were attached transversely to bilateral sham BL33 and sham BL35 (using sham electrodes) respectively. The parameters of sham EA apparatus and the treatment course were the same as in the EA group.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Change From Baseline of Urine Leakage Measured by 1-hour Pad Test
Time Frame: Baseline and week 6
Baseline and week 6

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline of the 72-hour Incontinence Episode Frequency (IEF)
Time Frame: Baseline, weeks 1-6, weeks 15-18 and weeks 27-30

Data of IEF was from 72-hour bladder diary recorded by participants over the last 72 hours of weeks 0 (baseline), weeks 2, 4, 6 (treatment period) and weeks 15-18,and 27-30 (follow-up period).

The 72-hour IEF of weeks 1-6 equaled the sum of 72h IEF at weeks 2, 4 and 6 divided by 3; The 72-hour IEF of weeks 15-18 equaled the sum of 72h IEF at weeks 15-18 divided by 4; The 72-hour IEF of weeks 27-30 equaled the sum of 72h IEF at weeks 27-30 divided by 4.
Baseline, weeks 1-6, weeks 15-18 and weeks 27-30
Change From Baseline of the Total ICIQ-SF Scores
Time Frame: Baseline, and weeks 6, 18 and 30
The International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form (ICIQ-SF) was a brief and robust measure for evaluating the symptoms and impact of urinary incontinence.It was used to assess the influence of urinary incontinence on quality of life during the past 4 weeks retrospectively. It contained three items on frequency, amount of leakage, and overall impact on quality of life, and a fourth, non-scored item for the assessment of type of incontinence. A total score was summed by the scores of the first three items, ranging from 0 to 21. A higher value indicates increased severity.
Baseline, and weeks 6, 18 and 30
Patient Self-evaluation of Therapeutic Effect
Time Frame: weeks 6, 18 and 30

Participants were asked to rate the extent of help that they received from treatment as no help, little help. moderate help or great help.

Number of participants reporting different extent of help was collected.
weeks 6, 18 and 30

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Adverse Events
Time Frame: weeks 1-30
Number of participants who experienced Adverse Events was collected.
weeks 1-30

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Guang'anmen Hospital of China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Zhishun Liu, Doctor, Guang'anmen Hospital of China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
December 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
July 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
July 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 13, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 14, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
May 15, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
June 15, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 29, 2015

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2012BAI24B01-021

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stress Urinary Incontinence

Clinical Trials on EA

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings