Induction Chemotherapy, Chemoradiotherapy and Surgery in Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer Patients

May 27, 2015 updated by: Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Universidad de Navarra

Induction Chemotherapy, Chemo-radiotherapy and Surgery in Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer Patients: Long Term Results From a Single Institution.

The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of a neoadjuvant approach in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer and the identification of prognostic factors.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Patients with locally advanced gastric cancer (T3-4 and/or N+) are included. Initially, patients are diagnosed by computerized tomography scan and endoscopic ultrasound.

The neoadjuvant strategy consists of 3-4 cycles of induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Chemoradiotherapy comprises weekly chemotherapy concurrently with daily external beam radiotherapy up to 45 Gy). Surgery is scheduled 4 to 6 weeks after the end of CRT. Pathological response is graded according to the Becker criteria. Statistical analysis is performed IBM SPSS v20.

Estimate whether R0 resection rate, pathological response degree, patterns of recurrence and long-term outcomes may be initially predicted by dynamic prognostic factors as tumor size, neutrophil lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet lymphocyte ratio (PLR)

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
46

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Spain
    • Navarra
      • Pamplona, Navarra, Spain, 31008
        • Clinica Universidad de Navarra

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the stomach treated with a neoadjuvant protocol consisting of induction chemotherapy (ICT), chemoradiotherapy (CRT)and salvage surgery. Patients must have a medically fit condition to complete the protocol.

Initial staging comprises a thoracic and abdominal computerised tomography scan, endoscopic ultrasound endoscopy (EUS), biopsy and blood test including blood cell count, hepatic and renal function.

Radiological and endoscopic evaluations are performed at baseline and at the completion of ICT and CRT.

Blood tests are acquired at baseline, before each chemotherapy course and concurrently with evaluations. Blood tests are also obtained during follow-up and at the time progression.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the stomach
  • Age ≥18 years old
  • Performance Status- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) 0-1
  • Body mass index ≥ 18
  • No prior chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy
  • TNM stage of T3-T4 and/or positive regional lymph nodes (N+) by endoscopic ultrasound or computed tomography (CT)
  • No evidence of metastasis (M0)
  • Adequate hematological, liver and renal functions (ALT and AST≤2.5 UNL, total bilirubin ≤1.5 UNL, and serum creatinine ≤1.5 UNL)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with previous (less than 10 years) or current history of malignant neoplasms, except for curatively treated
  • Patients with evidence of severe or uncontrolled systemic disease
  • Medically unfit for chemotherapy
  • Tumors involving the esophageal junction, comprising siewert I to III

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall Survival
Time Frame: From date of treatment until death, assessed up to 10 years
Overall was defined as the period from diagnosis until death (from any cause).
From date of treatment until death, assessed up to 10 years
Identification of prognostic factors for overall survival
Time Frame: From date of treatment until death, assessed up to 10 years
Overall was defined as the period from diagnosis until death (from any cause). Correlation between survival and baseline, clinical and treatment characteristics from patients
From date of treatment until death, assessed up to 10 years
Disease-free survival
Time Frame: From date of diagnosis until progression or death, assessed up to 10 years
Disease-free survival was defined as the time from diagnosis to the first date of local or distant cancer.
From date of diagnosis until progression or death, assessed up to 10 years
R0 resection rate
Time Frame: Week 24 to 28
The R0 resection rate in the patients treated with the neoadjuvant protocol. R0 is defined as a microscopically margin-negative resection, in which no gross or microscopic tumor remains in the primary tumor bed.
Week 24 to 28

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pathological response
Time Frame: Week 24 to 28
Specimen analysis according to TNM classification. Pathological complete response is defined as no invasive cancer cells in the surgical specimen.
Week 24 to 28
Patterns of treatment failure
Time Frame: From date of diagnosis until treatment failure, assessed up to 10 years
Type of recurrence: local, regional and/or distant.
From date of diagnosis until treatment failure, assessed up to 10 years
Adverse events are assessed according to CTC criteria v 4.0
Time Frame: Week 1 to 20
Safety and tolerability during the neoadjuvant protocol.
Week 1 to 20

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Universidad de Navarra

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: javier Rodriguez Rodriguez, MD, PhD, CUN

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
March 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
March 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 22, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 26, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
May 27, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 28, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 27, 2015

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • GC-PKPDGN

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Adenocarcinoma

Clinical Trials on Induction chemotherapy

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings