Novel Stimulation Patterns for the Treatment of Dystonia

October 25, 2016 updated by: University of Florida

Novel Stimulation Patterns and Personalized Deep Brain Stimulation for the Treatment of Dystonia

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an effective surgical therapy for select Dystonia patients who are refractory to medications or who have generalized symptoms (e.g. patients with Early-Onset Primary Dystonia(DYT1) mutations and other dystonia subtypes). DBS patients typically experience significant improvement in disabling symptoms; however, detailed programming is always required, and stimulation-induced side effects commonly emerge. Clinicians may empirically vary voltage, pulse width, frequency and also the active contacts on the DBS lead to achieve observed optimal benefits.

The majority of DBS patients undergo repeat surgeries to replace the implantable pulse generator (IPG) every 2.5 to 5 years. It has been demonstrated that, in dystonia patients, that higher settings are required for adequate symptomatic control, and that neurostimulators have a considerably shorter life when compared to neurostimulators from patients with essential tremor or Parkinson's disease. Additionally, several smaller studies have suggested that alternative pulse stimulation properties and pulse shape modifications can lower IPG battery consumption.

Newer patterns of stimulation (regularity of pulses and shapes of pulses) have not been widely tested in clinical practice, and are not part of the current FDA device labeling. Novel patterns of stimulation do however, have the potential to improve symptoms, reduce side effects, and to preserve the neurostimulator life.

The current research proposal will prospectively study biphasic pulse stimulation paradigms and its effects on dystonic symptoms. The investigators aim to demonstrate that we can tailor DBS settings to address dystonia symptoms, improve the safety profile, characterize distinct clinical advantages, and carefully document the safety and neurostimulator battery consumption profile for biphasic stimulation.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

In this research study, different stimulation patterns on the DBS device will be tried for effectiveness against current symptoms. There will be two different stimulation patterns that will be performed and can occur at different clinic dates. Each of the stimulation patterns will have times varying between 2-3 hours per stage. One part of the study will deliver stimulation in a continuous manner, while the other part of the study will deliver stimulation based upon responses obtained from changes in brain wave patterns. These procedures can be performed while in the clinic for regular programming visits or at different visits. The current DBS setting will be recorded and at the end of the session the setting will be reset to back to the previous settings. The participant will have the option of participating in both or just one part.

During the visit, the participant will be analyzed for tremor and slowness by using the Trigno wireless Electromyography (EMG) and the Kinesia system. The system includes a unit composed of two modules: a wrist module, which is the size of an I-Pod and will be attached to the wrist over a comfortable wristband, and a sensor module, which will be placed over the index finger.

The entire visit will be videotaped and UDRS (Unified Dystonia Disease Rating Scale) and BFMDRS (Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale) scores will be evaluated by two scorers. Pre-DBS "off" and "on" scores will also be taken.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
10

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Florida
      • Gainesville, Florida, United States, 32607
        • Center for Movement Disorders and Neurorestoration

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

This is a preliminary pilot investigation that will utilize a within subjects study design and will screen 10 generalized dystonia and screen 10 cervical dystonia patients.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of primary generalized dystonia or cervical dystonia
  • Bilaterally implanted globus pallidus interus(GPi) DBS.
  • Minimum of 6 months of chronic stimulation
  • Greater than 60 days on stable DBS settings

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Does not have DBS for dystonia or cervical dystonia

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Case-Only
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Biphasic DBS stimulations
Subjects in this group with have Biphasic DBS stimulation setting performed, Unified Dystonia Rating Scale (UDRS), and Burke-Fahn- Marsden scale (BFMDRS), tremor accelerometer, kinesia accelerometer, and GaitRite walking assessments performed.
Device: Biphasic DBS stimulation

The following protocol will be followed for each subject. In between, baseline and novel stimulation settings there will be a 30-minute washout period with DBS in the off state.

  1. Current best/optimized DBS setting (considered "baseline")
  2. DBS off for 30 minutes
  3. Biphasic pulse stimulation mode (immediate assessment)
  4. Biphasic pulse stimulation mode (assessment at 1h)
  5. Biphasic pulse stimulation mode (assessment at 2h)
Other: Unified Dystonia Rating Scale
Neurologist use the UDRS to determine the severity and duration of dystonia on 14 body areas.
Other Names:
  • UDRS
Other: Burke-Fahn- Marsden scale
Neurologist use the BFMDRS to rate the severity of dystonia in 9 regions of the body.
Other Names:
  • BFMDRS

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Blinded Unified Dystonia Rating Scale (UDRS)
Time Frame: Day 1
Neurologist use the UDRS to determine the severity and duration of dystonia on 14 body areas. Each body region is assessed and scores range from 0 (no dystonia) to 4 (extreme dystonia). The maximum UDRS score is 112 and includes severity and duration factors.
Day 1
Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale (BFMDRS)
Time Frame: Day 1
Neurologist use the BFMDRS to rate the severity of dystonia in 9 regions of the body. Provoking and severity factors are ranked from 0 (no dystonia) to 4 (extreme dystonia) for each body region and then adjusted scores are summed to give an overall score from 0 to 120.
Day 1

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Tremor accelerometer to measure motor dysfunction
Time Frame: Day 1
Tremor accelerometer for the patients with a component of dystonic tremor (device taped or attached to the wrist by an elastic band to record how fast the tremor).
Day 1
Kinesia accelerometer to measure motor dysfunction
Time Frame: Day 1
Kinesia accelerometer for the patients with a mobile component of dystonia (device attached to the arms and legs (by an elastic band or tape) to record movements).
Day 1
Battery Consumption compared between pre and post settings
Time Frame: Day 2
Battery consumption will be calculated and compared between the NEW settings and patients' baseline settings. The Medtronic battery estimator helpline will be used to calculate battery life, as well as the University of Florida calculator.
Day 2
GaitRite walking assessment.
Time Frame: Day 1
The GaitRite is an automated floor that when you walk on the floor it records your gait pattern.
Day 1

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Florida

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Medtronic

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Leonardo Almeida, MD, University of Florida Center for Movement Disorders and Neurorestoration

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
January 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
August 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 3, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 8, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 11, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
October 27, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 25, 2016

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
October 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • IRB201500366

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cervical Dystonia

Clinical Trials on Biphasic DBS stimulation

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings