The Effects of Waning of Botulinum Toxin in the Treatment of Cervical Dystonia

March 13, 2025 updated by: Western University, Canada

Investigation of Waning Time in Patients with Cervical Dystonia Converted to Botulinum Toxin a

The main treatment for cervical dystonia is botulinum toxin injections. However, some patients receiving this treatment after many years tend to experience short duration of benefit. Typically, botulinum toxin brands used in clinic are Botox or Xeomin. Another type of botulinum toxin is called Dysport (Ipsen Biopharmaceuticals), and Dysport may increase duration of benefit from the injections. The study is selecting patients from the investigator's clinics who are not satisfied with the duration of their treatment and are willing to switch to Dysport and the investigators will monitor if Dysport will increase the duration of benefit over a total of 3 treatments. A group of patients will be switched to Dysport while another group will remain on their original botulinum toxin formulation. The patients will be unaware of the treatment switch and hence are considered to be blinded. The investigators will not be blinded. Treatments are given every 3 months. All study visits will occur at the local sites of the 3 recruiting sites.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Detailed Description

Cervical dystonia (CD) is a disabling and often painful condition clinically characterized by abnormal neck and head postures and movements often associated with tremor and chronic pain. Botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A) is an effective and safe first-line therapy for CD. However, in a recent patient perspective survey, symptom re-emergence between injections (a mean 10.5 weeks) was reported in 88% of patients with a waning time of ≤8 weeks in one-third of patients. Waning treatment effects prior to re-injection reduces quality of life as 47% of patients are somewhat satisfied, and 39% were not satisfied with their therapy as symptoms may follow a "yo-yo" pattern . 45% of patients would prefer a ≤10-week treatment cycle due to the short therapeutic response. However, practicality of injecting patients more frequently and concerns about potential immunologically mediated resistance to BoNT-A has resulted in a standard of treating at intervals of at least 12 weeks. Thus, a significant unmet need is a long-lasting therapy that delays symptom re-emergence and may improve patient satisfaction and outcomes.

Nine published clinical studies have studied the direct comparison between Botox and Dysport in CD patients and authors concluded that a simple dose-conversion factor is not applicable as the ratio for Botox to Dysport was extremely variable, ranging from 1.2 to 13.3. Yun et al demonstrated that conversion to Dysport using a Botox:Dysport ratio of 1:2.5 was not inferior to Botox. A double blind, crossover study lasting 3 injection cycles studied 2 ratios (1:3 and 1:4) and found at both conversion ratios, Dysport was superior to Botox in terms of symptom reduction and duration of effect, although higher frequency of adverse effects such as dysphagia was reported. More recently, a double-blind, randomized crossover study evaluated 2 conversion ratios (1:3 and 1:1.7) that did not show any differences in efficacy in the short term, but the effect of Botox was reduced after 3 months. At week 12, a statistically significant difference in efficacy between abobotulinumtoxinA and onabotulinumtoxinA (1:3) was observed, suggesting a shorter duration of effect for the latter when this ratio (at low dose) was used. Thus, in this research study, the objective is to determine if conversion ratio of 1:2.5 (Botox:Dysport) from the patient's optimized, stable treatment (either Botox or Xeomin) can increase duration of BoNT-A efficacy.

A pilot study published by our research group reported a significant increase in waning time and efficacy following the conversion to aboBoNT-A in 27 CD patients who had a waning time of ≤8-weeks on their original BoNT-A formulation (either onaBoNT-A/incoBoNT-A). The results of the pilot study were limited by the lack of participant blinding and absence of a control group. Thus, a randomized, controlled, single-blind study will be conducted to determine whether the conversion to aboBoNT-A affects waning time, clinical outcomes and treatment satisfaction in patients experiencing early waning with ona/incoBoNT-A.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

45

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients aged 18 years or above with a diagnosis of isolated CD
  • Experience efficacious relief with a waning time of ≤8 weeks post-injection
  • Must have received the same dose and injection pattern of onaBoNT-A or incoBoNT-A for at least 3 injection cycles prior to study initiation with an injection cycle of 12 weeks

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Require a total dose <80 U or >300 U ona/incoBoNT-A
  • Pure reterocollis or suspected secondary non-responsiveness
  • No interest in switching between BoNT-A formulations
  • Prolonged history of dysphagia
  • History of poor response to BoNT-A or BoNT-B
  • Inability to complete study visits or sign informed consent
  • Pregnancy
  • Known resistance or contradictions to any BoNT-A
  • Known hypersensitivity to BoNT-A or related compound

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: aboBoNT-A
  1. Next 3 injections (every 12 weeks) are using aboBoNT-A (Dysport)
  2. First Dysport injection: 1:2.5 ona/incoBoNT-A: aboBoNT-A dose ratio conversion (reconstitution is 2 ml in a 500 U aboBoNT-A vial) (V1)
  3. Second and third injection: clinical optimization of aboBoNT-A dosing pattern at 12-weeks post aboBoNT-A injection. (V2 and V3). The 12 week period is compulsory.
  4. Return to original BoNT-A formulation (1:2.5 ona/incoBoNT-A: aboBoNT-A dose ratio), using same injection pattern as V3 (V4)
  5. Non-injection final study visit to conduct all assessments (V5)
Injection of toxin
Active Comparator: Original toxin arm
  1. Next 3 injections (every 12 weeks) are the same toxin as the original
  2. First injection: Dose may be optimized as per the investigators discretion or kept the same (reconstitution is 1 ml in a 100 U ona/incoBoNT-A vial) (V1)
  3. Second and third injection: clinical optimization of the dose as required with dosing pattern at weeks 12 post injection. (V2 and V3). The 12 week period is compulsory.
  4. Continue with the original toxin, using same injection pattern as V3 (V4)
  5. Non-injection final study visit to conduct all assessments (V5)
Injection of toxin

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Waining time.
Time Frame: At the end of each cycle for 3 cycles. Each cycle is 12 weeks in duration as the reinjection is done every 12 weeks.
Waning time - time from last injection to participant perception of treatment effects starting to wear off. An increase in waning time is a better outcome. Values will be between 8 to 12 weeks.
At the end of each cycle for 3 cycles. Each cycle is 12 weeks in duration as the reinjection is done every 12 weeks.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
• Modified Tsui Scale
Time Frame: At the end of each cycle for 3 cycles. Each cycle is 12 weeks in duration as the reinjection is done every 12 weeks.
• Modified Tsui Scale for assessment of severity of cervical dystonia. A lower score is an improvement in outcome. Minimum value is 0 and maximum value is 18.
At the end of each cycle for 3 cycles. Each cycle is 12 weeks in duration as the reinjection is done every 12 weeks.
• 5-point Likert participant reported treatment satisfaction tool
Time Frame: At the end of each cycle for 3 cycles. Each cycle is 12 weeks in duration as the reinjection is done every 12 weeks.
• 5-point Likert participant reported treatment satisfaction tool of injection of botulinum toxin for cervical dystonia. . A higher score on the scale denotes an improvement in the symptoms of cervical dystonia. Minimum value is 0 and maximum value is 5.
At the end of each cycle for 3 cycles. Each cycle is 12 weeks in duration as the reinjection is done every 12 weeks.
• Onset of treatment relief using the symptom tracker
Time Frame: At the end of each cycle for 3 cycles. Each cycle is 12 weeks in duration as the reinjection is done every 12 weeks.
• Onset of treatment relief using the symptom tracker. This is the time at which point improvement in the symptoms of cervical dystonia are noted by the participant.
At the end of each cycle for 3 cycles. Each cycle is 12 weeks in duration as the reinjection is done every 12 weeks.
• Safety of the use of botulinum toxin injection for cervical dystonia
Time Frame: At the end of each cycle for 3 cycles. Each cycle is 12 weeks in duration as the reinjection is done every 12 weeks.
• Safety will be measured as reported side effects by the patient from the injection of botulinum toxin for cervical dystonia. Treatment related adverse events will be documented and commented upon as related or unrelated to the treatment. This will be documented at every 12 week clinic visit.
At the end of each cycle for 3 cycles. Each cycle is 12 weeks in duration as the reinjection is done every 12 weeks.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Mandar Jog, MD, Univ of Western Ontario

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

March 30, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 30, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 30, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 20, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 13, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 13, 2025

Last Verified

January 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cervical Dystonia, Primary

Clinical Trials on Botulinum toxin type A injection

Subscribe