Physiology, Imaging and Modeling of Essential Tremor

September 1, 2026 updated by: University of Florida

Physiology, Imaging and Modeling of Deep Brain Stimulation for Essential Tremor

This project aims to investigate novel ways to deliver brain stimulation to Essential Tremor (ET) patients by introducing software changes to their existing devices. The study team aims to investigate safety and efficacy of these new stimulation parameters in patients with ET.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a neuromodulatory therapy that is effective in a subset of well selected essential tremor (ET) patients. However, as many as 1/5 of patients may initially improve, but then steadily worsen following the operation. The investigators developed a technique to study a variety of alternative stimulation methods without the use of an invasive repeat surgical intervention.

The electrophysiological effects of non-conventional DBS differ from traditional DBS, however the physiological differences in the setting of human tremor remain largely unknown. This study plans to explore gaps in knowledge of neuromodulation and will collect and contribute essential information to the underlying mechanism of action of DBS. The hypothesis of this project centers around active biphasic stimulation providing a wider therapeutic window and a lower adverse event profile as compared to conventional DBS.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

12

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Florida
      • Gainesville, Florida, United States, 32610
        • UF Health at the University of Florida
      • Gainesville, Florida, United States, 32611
        • McKnight Brain Institute--Fixel Center for Neurological Diseases

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Existing unilateral or bilateral VIN DBS for ET, non-demented (MMSE>24), and must have a documented suboptimal tremor suppression on two successive visits (compared to the baseline post-operative improvement at 6 months following ET DBS surgery). For bilateral cases, the most affected tremor side will be studied.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • No diagnosis of Essential Tremor

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Patients with Essential Tremor
Patients with chronically implanted DBS devices for ET who experience progressive worsening of tremor symptoms over time. The DBS implantable pulse generator (IPG) will be loaded with a temporary custom firmware to allow implementation of active biphasic pulse stimulation. The following random conditions will be applied: (1) Home Settings; (2) VIN Biphasic; (3) Stimulator Off. A 30-minute washout period will be applied between each of the random conditions. Therefore, each patient will serve as their own control.
During this visit, the DBS implantable pulse generator (IPG) will be loaded with a temporary custom firmware to allow implementation of active biphasic pulse stimulation.
During this visit, the DBS implantable pulse generator (IPG) will be loaded with a temporary custom firmware to allow implementation of active biphasic pulse stimulation.
During this visit, the DBS implantable pulse generator (IPG) will be loaded with a temporary custom firmware to allow implementation of active biphasic pulse stimulation.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Fiber Activation Threshold From Stimulation With ET DBS
Time Frame: 4 hours
The study team will use computer simulation and virtual reconstruction of the brain from pre-operative MRI data to calculate the fiber activation threshold for the duration that each subject is on the home settings versus the biphasic settings. The investigators will assess the feasibility of the patterns to address the worsening of ET that may occur in 20% or more of the ET population. No fiber activation threshold data was collected for the DBS OFF state since the system was not active.
4 hours
Home Settings DBS Versus Active Biphasic Pulse DBS Settings
Time Frame: 4 hours

The investigators will compare the degree of tremor suppression from the home settings versus active biphasic DBS. The degree of tremor will be quantified by the Fahn-Tolosa-Marin Tremor Rating Scale (sum of motor score parts A and B; range 0 - 116). A higher Tremor Rating Scale score is associated with more severe motor symptoms.

The clinical metrics represent the change from DBS OFF to the active arm (either home settings or biphasic VIN) after 4 hours of stimulation

4 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Tremor Motor Physiology
Time Frame: 4 hour
Essential tremor motor physiology will be recorded by the Kinesia ONE accelerometer system. The Kinesia ONE system utilizes a wireless, wearable motion sensor and portable transducer to translate movement metrics into a tremor severity score ranging from 0 (no symptoms) to 4 (severe symptoms). In this study, the reported tremor severity score represents motor function captured after 4 hours of active DBS - under either the participants' home settings or the VIN biphasic configuration.
4 hour
Gait Impairment - Step Length
Time Frame: 4 hours
Essential tremor's effect on gait will be assessed by the GAITRite system. Patients will walk along a GAITRite floor mat to have the various gait parameters such as step length measured. The GAITRite system translates movement metrics into an objective kinematic score. In this study, the reported kinematic scores represent motor function captured after 4 hours of active DBS - under either the participants' home settings or the VIN biphasic configuration.
4 hours
Gait Impairment - Stride Length
Time Frame: 4 hours
Essential tremor's effect on gait will be assessed by the GAITRite system. Patients will walk along a GAITRite floor mat to have the various gait parameters such as stride length measured. The GAITRite system translates movement metrics into an objective kinematic score. In this study, the reported kinematic scores represent motor function captured after 4 hours of active DBS - under either the participants' home settings or the VIN biphasic configuration.
4 hours
Gait Impairment - Step Time
Time Frame: 4 hours
Essential tremor's effect on gait will be assessed by the GAITRite system. Patients will walk along a GAITRite floor mat to have the various gait parameters such as step time measured. The GAITRite system translates movement metrics into an objective kinematic score. In this study, the reported kinematic scores represent motor function captured after 4 hours of active DBS - under either the participants' home settings or the VIN biphasic configuration.
4 hours
Gait Impairment - Gait Cycle Time
Time Frame: 4 hours
Essential tremor's effect on gait will be assessed by the GAITRite system. Patients will walk along a GAITRite floor mat to have the various gait parameters such as gait cycle time measured. The GAITRite system translates movement metrics into an objective kinematic score. In this study, the reported kinematic scores represent motor function captured after 4 hours of active DBS - under either the participants' home settings or the VIN biphasic configuration.
4 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Joshua K Wong, MD, Univeristy of Florida

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 17, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 17, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

January 22, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 3, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 1, 2026

Last Verified

June 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe