Samu Save Sepsis: Early Goal Directed Therapy in Pre Hospital Care of Patients With Severe Sepsis and/or Septic Shock (SSS)

November 17, 2025 updated by: Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
The purpose of this study is to determine whether an aggressive strategy of severe sepsis patients since pre hospital care, including early antibiotics administration, hemodynamic optimization, and opotherapy when indicated, could reduce mortality

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Major prognostic factor in sepsis management is rapidity of treatments implementation. In 2001, Rivers observed a reduction in mortality through early hemodynamic optimization. In 2009, Arnold emphasizes that establishing more early antibiotic therapy allowed a further reduction of mortality.

In France, pre hospital care is based on mobile intensive care unit (MICU) called SMUR. SMUR is consisting of a driver, a nurse and an emergency physician.

Actually in France, management of severe septic syndrome (severe sepsis and septic shock) are not standardized and based on a "conventional" strategy at the discretion of the emergency physician. Antibiotics are given in only two cases: fulminans purpura and meningitis. Hemodynamic optimization is not a standard of care and no recommendation exist for hemodynamic targets.

An "aggressive" strategy based on early antibiotics administration, hemodynamic optimization and opotherapy when required could be initiated by SMUR since first contact with the patient before hospital admission.

We assume that an "aggressive" strategy initiated during the first 60 minutes of prehospital stage compared to "conventional" strategy could allow to reduce mortality in severe sepsis patients.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
398

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • France
      • Paris, France, 75015
        • Anesthesiology, Intensive Care Unit and emergency department - Necker Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

All patients fulfilling the following criteria:

  • Age ≥ 18 years

  • Patient with suspected severe infection defined by the existence of a suspected infection AND

    • Hypotension before vascular fluid loading AND/OR
    • Lactataemia greater than 4 mmol/l AND/OR
    • Glasgow scale lower than 13 AND/OR
    • Mottling score greater than 2
  • Patient with a septic shock

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age <18 years or Unable
  • Pregnant
  • Severe concomitant pathology requiring urgent care(i.e.epilepsy)
  • Status "not to be reanimated" life expectancy less than 6 months with no indication of reanimation support ( prior decision on care limitation).
  • Fulminans purpura
  • True allergy to beta-lactam defined by an angioedema or by an anaphylactic shock during a prior exposure to beta-lactam.
  • Patient who have already received hemodynamic optimization or antibiotic treatment before the MICU's (Mobile Intensive Care Unit) care.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
No Intervention: Conventional
No antibiotic administration and no hemodynamic target are required
Active Comparator: Aggressive
Antibiotics (Ceftriaxone or piperacillin tazobactam) administration, hemodynamic optimization and opotherapy (norepinephrine, hydrocortisone) when required should be performed in the first 60 minutes after contact with the patient
Drug: Ceftriaxone
Ceftriaxone 2g IV will be infused in the first 60 minutes, for non nosocomial severe septic syndrome
Drug: Piperacillin tazobactam
Piperacillin/tazobactam 4g IV will be infused in the first 60 minutes, for nosocomial severe septic syndrome
Drug: Norepinephrine
Norepinephrine will be infused after failure of hemodynamic optimization using vascular fluid loading
Drug: Hydrocortisone
Hydrocortisone 100mg IV will be infused after failure of hemodynamic optimization using norepinephrine with at least 1.5mg/h

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Number of death
Time Frame: 28 days
28 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Number of death
Time Frame: 90 days
90 days
Number of death
Time Frame: at hospital discharge time, estimated at 90 days
at hospital discharge time, estimated at 90 days
Number of days of stay in intensive care unit
Time Frame: at Intensive Care Unit discharge time, estimated at 90 days
at Intensive Care Unit discharge time, estimated at 90 days
Number of days of stay at hospital
Time Frame: at hospital discharge time, estimated at 90 days
at hospital discharge time, estimated at 90 days
Number of days of vasopressor support
Time Frame: at Intensive Care Unit discharge time, estimated at 90 days
at Intensive Care Unit discharge time, estimated at 90 days
Number of days of mechanical ventilation support
Time Frame: at Intensive Care Unit discharge time, estimated at 90 days
at Intensive Care Unit discharge time, estimated at 90 days
Number of days of renal replacement therapy
Time Frame: at Intensive Care Unit discharge time, estimated at 90 days
at Intensive Care Unit discharge time, estimated at 90 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
URC-CIC Paris Descartes Necker Cochin

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Romain Jouffroy, MD, Anesthesiology, Intensive Care Unit and emergency department - Necker Hospital - 149 rue de Sèvres 75015 Paris - France

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
May 9, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
February 9, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
February 9, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 12, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 15, 2015

First Posted (Estimated)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 16, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
November 20, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 17, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
October 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2014-A01030-47

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Severe Septic Syndrome (Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock) Diagnosed and Treated by Mobile Intensive Care Unit

Clinical Trials on Ceftriaxone

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings