An Extension Study to Evaluate the Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of BMN 190 in Patients With CLN2 Disease

July 28, 2022 updated by: BioMarin Pharmaceutical

A Multicenter, Multinational, Extension Study to Evaluate the Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of BMN 190 in Patients With CLN2 Disease

The Phase 1/2 study (190-201) evaluated the efficacy and safety of a 300 mg dose of BMN 190 administered every other week (qow) to patients with CLN2. The dose and regimen for this study (190-202) are based on the results of the 190-201 study. The rationale for this phase 2 extension study is to provide patients who complete the 190-201 study with the option to continue BMN 190 treatment. The 190-202 study is an open label extension protocol to assess long-term safety and efficacy.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

BMN 190 is a recombinant form of human tripeptidyl peptidase 1 (TPP1), the enzyme deficient in patients with CLN2 disease (also known as classical late-infantile CLN2, cLINCL, or Jansky-Bielschowsky disease), a form of Batten Disease. As an enzyme replacement therapy (ERT), BMN 190 is designed to help restore TPP1 enzyme activity. The Phase 1/2 study (190-201) evaluated the efficacy and safety of a 300 mg dose of BMN 190 administered every other week (qow) to patients with CLN2. The dose and regimen for this study (190-202) are based on the results of the 190-201 study. The rationale for this phase 2 extension study is to provide patients who complete the 190-201 study with the option to continue BMN 190 treatment. The 190-202 study is an open label extension protocol to assess long-term safety and efficacy.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
23

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Germany
      • Hamburg, Germany, 20246
        • Universitaetsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
  • Italy
    • Piazza
      • Rome, Piazza, Italy, 00165
        • Children's Hospital Bambino Gesù,IRCCS
  • United Kingdom
      • London, United Kingdom, WC1N 3JH
        • Great Ormond Street Childrens Hospital
  • United States
    • Ohio
      • Columbus, Ohio, United States, 43205
        • Nationwide Children's Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

8 months to 12 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Must have completed 48 weeks in Study 190-201.
  • Is willing and able to provide written, signed informed consent. Or, in the case of patients under the age of 18 (or other age as defined by regional law or regulation), provide written assent (if required) and have written informed consent, signed by a legally authorized representative, after the nature of the study has been explained, and prior to performance of research-related procedures.
  • Males and females who are of reproductive age should practice true abstinence, defined as no sexual activity, during the study and for 6 months after the study has been completed (or withdrawal from the study). If sexually active and not practicing true abstinence, males and females of reproductive age must use a highly effective method of contraception while participating in the study.
  • If female, of childbearing potential, must have a negative pregnancy test at the Screening Visit and be willing to have additional pregnancy tests done during the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Has had a loss of 3 or more points in the combined motor and language components of the Hamburg CLN2 rating scale between Baseline of Study 190-201 and the Study Completion visit in Study 190-201 and would not benefit from enrolling in the study in the Investigator's discretion.
  • Has a score of 0 points on the combined motor and language components of the Hamburg CLN2 rating scale.
  • Is pregnant or breastfeeding, at Baseline, or planning to become pregnant (self or partner) at any time during the study.
  • Has used any investigational product (other than BMN 190 in 190-201), or investigational medical device, within 30 days prior to Baseline; or is required to use any investigational agent prior to completion of all scheduled study assessments.
  • Has a concurrent disease or condition that would interfere with study participation, or pose a safety risk, as determined by the Investigator.
  • Has any condition that, in the view of the Investigator, places the patient at high risk of poor treatment compliance or of not completing the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: BMN190 recombinant human tripeptidyl peptidase-1 (rhTPP1)
All 190-202 study subjects administered BMN 190 300 mg by continuous Intracerebroventricular (ICV) infusion at a rate of 2.5 mL/hour for approximately 4 hours) every 14 days.
Biological: BMN 190
300 mg Intracerebroventricular (ICV) infusion administered every other week for up to 240 weeks
Other Names:
  • recombinant human tripeptidyl peptidase-1 (rhTPP1)
  • cerliponase alfa
Device: Intracerebroventricular (ICV) access device
Surgical implantation of an MRI compatible ICV access device in the lateral ventricle of the right hemisphere is required for administration of study drug.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Probability of Unreversed 2-point Decline in Motor-language (ML) Score or Score of 0
Time Frame: Up to Week 289

Motor and Language are each 0-3 point subscales in which 3 represents best function and 0 represents loss of function. Thus, the 0-6 point ML score was used as the primary mode of evaluation of loss of function.

In 190-201, the primary endpoint was a responder endpoint: unreversed ML 2-point decline or score of 0 at Week 48 compared to the 50% rate expected in natural history using the 1-sample binomial test. For 190-202, the primary endpoint was revised to assess response over the full duration of follow-up. It is not clear, given the variable follow-up much greater than 48 weeks, what response rate is expected in natural history. For this reason, the assessment of the primary endpoint is based on comparing to natural history data and using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards model with covariate adjustment (i.e., baseline ML score and age as continuous covariates, and genotype [common alleles] and sex as categorical covariates).
Up to Week 289
Probability of Unreversed Motor-language (ML) Score of Zero.
Time Frame: Up to Week 289

Motor and Language are each 0-3 point subscales in which 3 represents best function and 0 represents loss of function. Thus, the 0-6 point ML score was used as the primary mode of evaluation of loss of function.

In 190-201, the primary endpoint was a responder endpoint: unreversed ML 2-point decline or score of 0 at Week 48 compared to the 50% rate expected in natural history using the 1-sample binomial test. For 190-202, the primary endpoint was revised to assess response over the full duration of follow-up. It is not clear, given the variable follow-up much greater than 48 weeks, what response rate is expected in natural history. For this reason, the assessment of the primary endpoint is based on comparing to natural history data and using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards model with covariate adjustment (baseline ML score, age, genotype [common alleles], and sex).
Up to Week 289

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Whole Brain Volume
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 1 of BMN 190-201) to Week 289 / Last observation
Percentage change from Baseline to Last Observation: Whole Brain volume
Baseline (Week 1 of BMN 190-201) to Week 289 / Last observation
Volume of Cerebrospinal Fluid
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 1 of BMN 190-201) to Week 289 / Last observation
Percentage Change from Baseline to last observation: Volume of cerebrospinal fluid
Baseline (Week 1 of BMN 190-201) to Week 289 / Last observation
Volume of Total Cortical Gray Matter
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 1 of BMN 190-201) to Week 289 / Last observation
Percentage Change from Baseline to last observation: Volume of total cortical gray matter
Baseline (Week 1 of BMN 190-201) to Week 289 / Last observation
Total White Matter Volume
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 1 of BMN 190-201) to Week 289 / Last observation
Percentage Change from Baseline to last observation: Total white matter volume
Baseline (Week 1 of BMN 190-201) to Week 289 / Last observation
Whole Brain Apparent Diffusion Coefficient
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 1 of BMN 190-201) to Week 289 / Last observation
Change from Baseline to last observation Whole brain apparent diffusion coefficient
Baseline (Week 1 of BMN 190-201) to Week 289 / Last observation

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
BioMarin Pharmaceutical

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: Medical Monitor, MD, BioMarin Pharmaceutical

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
February 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 10, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 10, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 24, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 29, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 30, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 24, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 28, 2022

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
July 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 190-202

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings