Safety and Efficacy of IDP-122 in the Treatment of Participants With Plaque Psoriasis

January 14, 2020 updated by: Bausch Health Americas, Inc.

A Phase 3, Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized, Vehicle Controlled Clinical Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of IDP-122 in the Treatment of Plaque Psoriasis

This study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a topical lotion when applied once daily to adult participants with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis (defined as an Investigator's Global Assessment [IGA] score of 3 or 4).

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The objective of the study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of topical IDP-122 Lotion when applied once daily to adult participants with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. The intent of the study is specifically to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a once daily application of IDP-122 Lotion in comparison with vehicle.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
213

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • California
      • Santa Ana, California, United States, 92701
        • Valeant Site 14
    • Florida
      • Boynton Beach, Florida, United States, 33424
        • Valeant Site 02
      • Clearwater, Florida, United States, 33755
        • Valeant Site 10
      • Tampa, Florida, United States, 33603
        • Valeant Site 1
    • Indiana
      • Plainfield, Indiana, United States, 46168
        • Valeant Site 07
    • Kansas
      • Olathe, Kansas, United States, 66051
        • Valeant Site 15
    • Minnesota
      • Fridley, Minnesota, United States, 55421
        • Valeant Site 08
    • Nebraska
      • Omaha, Nebraska, United States, 68022
        • Valeant Site 13
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10001
        • Valeant Site 04
      • Stony Brook, New York, United States, 11790
        • Valeant Site 12
    • North Carolina
      • High Point, North Carolina, United States, 27260
        • Valeant Site 05
    • Tennessee
      • Knoxville, Tennessee, United States, 37901
        • Valeant Site 11
    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77001
        • Valeant Site 03
      • San Antonio, Texas, United States, 78201
        • Valeant Site 09
    • Utah
      • West Jordan, Utah, United States, 84081
        • Valeant Site 06

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male or female, of any race, at least 18 years of age (inclusive).
  • Freely provides both verbal and written informed consent.
  • Has an area of plaque psoriasis appropriate for topical treatment that covers a body surface area (BSA) of at least 3%, but no more than 12%. The face, scalp, palms, soles, axillae, and intertriginous areas are to be excluded in this calculation.
  • Is willing and able to avoid prolonged exposure of the treatment area to ultraviolet radiation (natural and artificial) for the duration of the study.
  • Has a clinical diagnosis of psoriasis at the Baseline visit with an IGA score of 3 or 4. (The face, scalp, palms, soles, axillae and intertriginous areas are to be excluded in this assessment).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Has spontaneously improving or rapidly deteriorating plaque psoriasis or pustular psoriasis, as determined by the Investigator.
  • Presents with psoriasis that was treated with prescription medication and failed to respond to treatment, even partially or temporarily, as determined by the Investigator.
  • Presents with any concurrent skin condition that could interfere with the evaluation of the treatment areas, as determined by the Investigator.
  • Is pregnant, nursing an infant, or planning a pregnancy during the study period.
  • Has received treatment with any investigational drug or device within 60 days or 5 drug half-lives (whichever is longer) prior to the Baseline visit or is concurrently participating in another clinical study with an investigational drug or device.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: IDP-122 Lotion
Participants will apply IDP-122 Lotion (halobetasol propionate [HP] 0.01%) topically once daily for 8 weeks.
Drug: IDP-122 Lotion
Medicated topical lotion
Other Names:
  • HP 0.01%
Placebo Comparator: IDP-122 Vehicle Lotion
Participants will apply IDP-122 Vehicle Lotion topically once daily for 8 weeks.
Drug: IDP-122 Vehicle Lotion
Vehicle topical lotion with no active ingredient

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants With Treatment Success at Week 8
Time Frame: Week 8
Treatment success defined as at least a 2-grade improvement from Baseline in the IGA score and an IGA score equating to "clear" or "almost clear" at Week 8. The IGA score was based on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 to 4 (0=clear, 1=almost clear, 2=mild, 3=moderate, and 4=severe). The face, scalp, palms, soles, axillae, and intertriginous areas were excluded from this assessment.
Week 8

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants With Treatment Success at Weeks 2, 4, 6, and 12
Time Frame: Weeks 2, 4, 6, and 12 (4-week follow-up)
Treatment success defined as at least a 2-grade improvement from Baseline in the Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) score and an IGA score equating to "clear" or "almost clear" at Weeks 2, 4, 6, and 12. The IGA score was based on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 to 4 (0=clear, 1=almost clear, 2=mild, 3=moderate, and 4=severe). The face, scalp, palms, soles, axillae, and intertriginous areas were excluded from this assessment.
Weeks 2, 4, 6, and 12 (4-week follow-up)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Bausch Health Americas, Inc.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
November 5, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
March 15, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
March 15, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
July 31, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 31, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 4, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
January 27, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 14, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
January 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • V01-122A-302

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Plaque Psoriasis

Clinical Trials on IDP-122 Lotion

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings