Efficacy and Safety of IDP-124 Lotion for the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis in Pediatric and Adult Subjects

April 12, 2023 updated by: Bausch Health Americas, Inc.

A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Vehicle-Controlled, Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of IDP-124 Lotion for the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis in Pediatric and Adult Subjects

Efficacy and Safety of IDP-124 Lotion for the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis in Pediatric and Adult Subjects

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Vehicle-Controlled, Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of IDP-124 Lotion for the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis in Pediatric and Adult Subjects

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

328

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Fremont, California, United States, 94536
        • Valeant Site 05

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

2 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male or female at least 2 years of age and older
  • Written and verbal informed consent must be obtained; subjects less than age of consent must sign an assent for the study and a parent or a legal guardian must sign the informed consent (if subject reaches age of consent during the study they should be re-consented at the next study visit)
  • Nonimmunocompromized male or female who failed to respond adequately to other topical prescription treatment for AD or for whom those treatments are not advisable
  • Subjects must be willing to comply with study instructions and return to the clinic for required visits; subjects under the age of consent must be accompanied by the parent or legal guardian at the time of assent/consent signing

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Females who are pregnant, breast feeding, or who wish to become pregnant during the study period
  • Active cutaneous bacterial or viral infection in any treatment area at Baseline (eg, clinically infected AD)
  • Sunburn, extensive scarring, or pigmented lesion(s) in any treatment area at Baseline, which would interfere with evaluations
  • History of confounding skin conditions, eg, psoriasis, rosacea, erythroderma, or ichthyosis (other than ichthyosis vulgaris)
  • History or presence of:
  • basal cell carcinoma of skin effectively treated more than 2 years ago
  • carcinoma of cervix effectively treated more than 5 years ago
  • immunological deficiencies or diseases, HIV, or serious recurrent infection
  • clinically significant severe renal insufficiency or severe hepatic disorders
  • Current or recent serious infection

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: IDP-124 Lotion
IDP-124 Lotion, twice-daily application
IDP-124 Lotion, twice-daily application
Active Comparator: IDP-124 Vehicle Lotion
IDP-124 Vehicle Lotion, twice-daily application
IDP-124 Vehicle Lotion, twice-daily application

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants Who Had at Least a 2-grade Reduction From Baseline at Week 6 in the Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) Scale and Had an IGA at Week 6 That Equated to "Clear" or "Almost Clear"
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 6
Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) was determined based on evaluator-blinded evaluations of the inflammatory signs of atopic dermatitis. Evaluations were scored using a 5-point scale from clear (0) to severe (4), with higher numbers indicating worse scores.
Baseline to Week 6

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants Who Had at Least a 2-grade Reduction From Baseline in the Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) Scale and Had an IGA That Equated to "Clear" or "Almost Clear"
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 10
Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) was determined based on evaluator-blinded evaluations of the inflammatory signs of atopic dermatitis. Evaluations were scored using a 5-point scale from clear (0) to severe (4), with higher numbers indicating worse scores.
Baseline to Week 10
Percentage of Participants Who Had Eczema Area Severity Index (EASI) 75
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 10
EASI 75 is defined as at least a 75% reduction in the Eczema Area Severity Index (EASI) score from Baseline. EASI is composite score based on the evaluated severity of 4 key signs of AD (i.e., erythema, infiltration/papulation, excoriation and lichenification), and the extent of disease in each of the 4 body regions (i.e., head/neck, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs). The area of involvement (affected by inflammation, not including dry skin) of each of the 4 body regions is determined and represented by a numeric coded value based on a scale from 0 to 6. The 4 body regions are assessed separately for each sign/symptom, and the average degree of severity of each sign in each of the 4 body parts is assigned a score of 0 (none) to 3 (severe) on a scale that allows half-unit increments. The EASI score ranges from 0 to 72, with higher scores being worse.
Baseline to Week 10
Percentage of Participants Who Had at Least a 1 Grade Improvement From Baseline in the Severity of Pruritus Score and a Pruritus Score Equating to "None" or "Mild"
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 2
Pruritis was assessed on a 4-point scale with 0 (none) to 3 (severe) and higher scores being worse.
Baseline to Week 2

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Anya Loncaric, Valeant Pharmaceitucals

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 14, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 12, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

May 12, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 21, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 16, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

February 23, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 8, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 12, 2023

Last Verified

April 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Atopic Dermatitis

Clinical Trials on IDP-124 Lotion

3
Subscribe