Post-authorisation Safety Study (PASS) of Influenza Vaccine in United Kingdom (UK)

February 11, 2016 updated by: GlaxoSmithKline

European Medicines Agency (EMA) Post-authorisation Safety Study of Influenza Vaccine

The purpose of this study is to conduct a pilot study to explore the potential use of routinely collected data in General Practitioner (GP) practices to conduct enhanced safety surveillance of seasonal influenza vaccines in the UK, as recommended in the EMA interim guidance on enhanced safety surveillance for seasonal influenza vaccines in the EU.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Data routinely collected as part of clinical consultations in primary care will be extracted from nine General Practitioner (GP) practices in order to estimate medically attended Adverse Events of Interest (AEIs), for people who have received an influenza vaccine. This study will also actively follow patients who were exposed to seasonal influenza vaccination for 7 days in three of the nine GP practices using a customised card-based adverse drug reaction reporting system, in order to determine whether a more active approach to surveillance can capture higher rates of AEIs.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
11530

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United Kingdom
      • Surrey, United Kingdom, GU2 7XH
        • GSK Investigational Site

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

6 months and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Registered patients in 9 GP practices in England and who are immunized against seasonal influenza between 1 September 2015 and 30 November 2015

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All individuals (aged 6 months and above) who will receive seasonal influenza vaccination in the 9 GP practices between 1 September 2015 and 30 November 2015.
  • Pregnant women are also included in this study.

Exclusion Criteria:

• Only registered patients who have explicitly opted out of data sharing will be excluded from the analysis.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Study Cohort
Subjects who will receive influenza vaccination between 1 September 2015 and 30 November 2015 in the 9 GP practices from who clinical data routinely collected as part of clinical consultations in primary care will be extracted.
Other: Vaccine safety surveillance
Extraction of routinely collected primary care data from nine GP practices and an active surveillance approach in 3 of the 9 GP practices, by using an existing card-based ADR reporting system (MHRA Yellow Card), to estimate proportions of AEIs among seasonal influenza-vaccinated individuals.
Other Names:
  • Data collection

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of patient counts of the total registered patients vaccinated by age strata, reported weekly and cumulatively by brand (also indicating those for whom brand data are unavailable)
Time Frame: Up to 3 months (between 1 September 2015 and 30 November 2015)
Up to 3 months (between 1 September 2015 and 30 November 2015)
Proportions of total registered patients vaccinated by age strata, reported weekly and cumulatively by brand (also indicating those for whom brand data are unavailable)
Time Frame: Up to 3 months (between 1 September 2015 and 30 November 2015)
Up to 3 months (between 1 September 2015 and 30 November 2015)
Number of patient counts of the total registered patients vaccinated by co-morbidity, reported weekly and cumulatively by brand (also indicating those for whom brand data are unavailable)
Time Frame: Up to 3 months (between 1 September 2015 and 30 November 2015)
Up to 3 months (between 1 September 2015 and 30 November 2015)
Proportions of total registered patients vaccinated by co-morbidity, reported weekly and cumulatively by brand (also indicating those for whom brand data are unavailable)
Time Frame: Up to 3 months (between 1 September 2015 and 30 November 2015)
Up to 3 months (between 1 September 2015 and 30 November 2015)
Number of patient counts of the vaccinated patients with reported endpoints of interest by age strata, reported weekly and cumulatively by brand (also indicating those for whom brand data are unavailable)
Time Frame: Up to 3 months (between 1 September 2015 and 30 November 2015)
- Presentation with fever or other febrile illness, - Presentation related to local reaction, - Presentation related to general reaction (fatigue, myalgia, etc.), - All other presentations that could plausibly be related to vaccination.
Up to 3 months (between 1 September 2015 and 30 November 2015)
Proportions of vaccinated patients with reported endpoints of interest by age strata, reported weekly and cumulatively by brand (also indicating those for whom brand data are unavailable)
Time Frame: Up to 3 months (between 1 September 2015 and 30 November 2015)
- Presentation with fever or other febrile illness, - Presentation related to local reaction, - Presentation related to general reaction (fatigue, myalgia, etc.), - All other presentations that could plausibly be related to vaccination.
Up to 3 months (between 1 September 2015 and 30 November 2015)
Number of patient counts of the vaccinated patients with reported endpoints of interest by co-morbidity, reported weekly and cumulatively by brand (also indicating those for whom brand data are unavailable)
Time Frame: Up to 3 months (between 1 September 2015 and 30 November 2015)
- Presentation with fever or other febrile illness, - Presentation related to local reaction, - Presentation related to general reaction (fatigue, myalgia, etc.), - All other presentations that could plausibly be related to vaccination.
Up to 3 months (between 1 September 2015 and 30 November 2015)
Proportions of vaccinated patients with reported endpoints of interest by co-morbidity, reported weekly and cumulatively by brand (also indicating those for whom brand data are unavailable)
Time Frame: Up to 3 months (between 1 September 2015 and 30 November 2015)
- Presentation with fever or other febrile illness, - Presentation related to local reaction, - Presentation related to general reaction (fatigue, myalgia, etc.), - All other presentations that could plausibly be related to vaccination.
Up to 3 months (between 1 September 2015 and 30 November 2015)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Completeness of vaccination data in the computerized medical record system.
Time Frame: Up to 3 months (between 1 September 2015 and 30 November 2015)
Up to 3 months (between 1 September 2015 and 30 November 2015)
Completeness of AEI reporting in the computerized medical record system.
Time Frame: Up to 3 months (between 1 September 2015 and 30 November 2015)
Up to 3 months (between 1 September 2015 and 30 November 2015)
Timeliness of vaccination data in the computerized medical record system.
Time Frame: Up to 3 months (between 1 September 2015 and 30 November 2015)
Up to 3 months (between 1 September 2015 and 30 November 2015)
Timeliness of AEI reporting in the computerized medical record system.
Time Frame: Up to 3 months (between 1 September 2015 and 30 November 2015)
Up to 3 months (between 1 September 2015 and 30 November 2015)
Completeness of vaccination data in the card-based adverse event reporting system.
Time Frame: Up to 3 months (between 1 September 2015 and 30 November 2015)
Up to 3 months (between 1 September 2015 and 30 November 2015)
Completeness of AEI reporting in the card-based adverse event reporting system.
Time Frame: Up to 3 months (between 1 September 2015 and 30 November 2015)
Up to 3 months (between 1 September 2015 and 30 November 2015)
Timeliness of vaccination data in the card-based adverse event reporting system.
Time Frame: Up to 3 months (between 1 September 2015 and 30 November 2015)
Up to 3 months (between 1 September 2015 and 30 November 2015)
Timeliness of AEI reporting in the card-based adverse event reporting system.
Time Frame: Up to 3 months (between 1 September 2015 and 30 November 2015)
Up to 3 months (between 1 September 2015 and 30 November 2015)
Incidence rates for the 5 most frequently reported AEs reported alongside those available in the literature from a similar population (vaccinated or general population if vaccinated not available) within the same risk period and stratified by age.
Time Frame: Up to 3 months (between 1 September 2015 and 30 November 2015)
Up to 3 months (between 1 September 2015 and 30 November 2015)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
GlaxoSmithKline

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
University of Surrey

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
November 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
November 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
September 18, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 1, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
October 5, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
February 12, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 11, 2016

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 202055

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings