A Study of Rivaroxaban for Early Discharge of Low Risk Pulmonary Embolism From the Emergency Department (MERCURY PE)

May 4, 2018 updated by: Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC

MulticEnter Trial of Rivaroxaban for Early disCharge of pUlmonaRY Embolism From the Emergency Department

The purpose of the study is to evaluate that low risk Pulmonary Embolism (PE) participants who are discharged from the Emergency Department (ED) to the home environment and treated with rivaroxaban as outpatients have fewer total days in the hospital for bleeding and/or venous thromboembolism (VTE) events through Day 30 compared to participants who are treated with initial hospitalization and standard-of-care.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This is a randomized (study medication is assigned by chance), open-label (all people know the identity of the intervention), parallel-group, multicenter (study conducted at multiple sites) study to evaluate that low risk PE participants who are discharged from the ED and treated with rivaroxaban compared to participants who are treated with initial hospitalization and standard-of-care. The study consists of a Screening and Randomization Period, followed by a 90-day open-label treatment period, and an end of study/early withdrawal (EOS) visit. The duration of study participation for each participant is approximately 3 months. The participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to one of two treatments. Safety will be monitored during the study.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
114

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Alabama
      • Montgomery, Alabama, United States
    • Arizona
      • Chandler, Arizona, United States
      • Phoenix, Arizona, United States
      • Tucson, Arizona, United States
    • California
      • Los Angeles, California, United States
      • Sacramento, California, United States
      • Sylmar, California, United States
    • Connecticut
      • New Haven, Connecticut, United States
    • District of Columbia
      • Washington, District of Columbia, United States
    • Florida
      • Pensacola, Florida, United States
      • Tampa, Florida, United States
    • Iowa
      • Davenport, Iowa, United States
      • Iowa City, Iowa, United States
    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States
    • Massachusetts
      • Springfield, Massachusetts, United States
    • Michigan
      • Detroit, Michigan, United States
      • Jackson, Michigan, United States
      • Lansing, Michigan, United States
      • Royal Oak, Michigan, United States
    • Missouri
      • Saint Louis, Missouri, United States
    • New Jersey
      • Atlantic City, New Jersey, United States
      • Camden, New Jersey, United States
    • New York
      • Brooklyn, New York, United States
      • Buffalo, New York, United States
      • New York, New York, United States
      • Stony Brook, New York, United States
    • North Carolina
      • Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
      • Charlotte, North Carolina, United States
      • Durham, North Carolina, United States
      • Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States
    • Ohio
      • Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
      • Cleveland, Ohio, United States
      • Toledo, Ohio, United States
      • Zanesville, Ohio, United States
    • Oregon
      • Portland, Oregon, United States
    • Pennsylvania
      • Allentown, Pennsylvania, United States
      • Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, United States
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
      • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
      • West Reading, Pennsylvania, United States
    • South Carolina
      • Charleston, South Carolina, United States
    • Texas
      • Dallas, Texas, United States
      • Fort Worth, Texas, United States
      • Houston, Texas, United States
    • Utah
      • Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
    • Virginia
      • Charlottesville, Virginia, United States
    • Washington
      • Bellingham, Washington, United States
      • Everett, Washington, United States
      • Spokane, Washington, United States
      • Tacoma, Washington, United States

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Have confirmed acute symptomatic Pulmonary Embolism (PE) with or without symptomatic deep vein thrombosis (DVT)
  • A PE participant diagnosed in the Emergency Department (ED) who is deemed to be at low risk of clinical deterioration as determined by the Hestia criteria
  • Have no contraindications to and be able to complete randomized treatment and all study assessments
  • Have a life expectancy of at least 6 months
  • Must be willing and able to adhere to the prohibitions and restrictions specified in this protocol

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Having received any Combined P-gp (P-glycoprotein) and strong CYP3A4 (Cytochrome P450) inhibitors (such as but not limited to ketoconazole, telithromycin or protease inhibitors) use within 4 days before randomization, or planned use during the study. Itraconazole use within 7 days before randomization or planned use during the study
  • Having received any Combined P-gp and strong CYP3A4 inducers (such as but not limited to rifampin/rifampicin, rifabutin, rifapentine, phenytoin, phenobarbital, carbamazepine, or St. John's Wort) use within 2 weeks before randomization or planned use during the study
  • Who Has contraindications to the use of any anticoagulant therapy (example, bleeding diathesis, history of gastrointestinal bleeding within 1 year or coagulopathy documented at Screening)
  • Who Has known allergies, hypersensitivity, or intolerance to rivaroxaban or its excipients
  • Woman who is pregnant, or breast-feeding, or planning to become pregnant

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Rivaroxaban
Participants will receive Rivaroxaban 15 milligram (mg) orally twice daily with food for the first 21 days followed by 20 mg orally once daily with food, for approximately 69 days for a total treatment duration of 90 days.
Drug: Rivaroxaban
Participants will receive Rivaroxaban 15 milligram (mg) twice daily up to Days 21 by orally and Rivaroxaban 20 mg once daily up to Days 90 by orally.
Experimental: local Standard-of-care
Participants will receive local Standard-of-care as per local protocol and defined by the medical team caring for the participant.
Drug: Standard-of-care
Standard-of-care as per local protocol and defined by the medical team caring for the participant.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean Duration of Hospitalization
Time Frame: Up to Day 30
Mean number of days of initial inpatient hospitalization (beginning from randomization to discharge from the hospital) plus any subsequent hospitalization(s) related to bleeding and/or venous thromboembolism (VTE) events up to 30 days were calculated.
Up to Day 30

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants With Reoccurrence of Symptomatic Venous Thromboembolism Event (VTE) (Composite of Recurrent PE, New or Recurrent DVT) or VTE-related Death
Time Frame: Up to 7, 14, 30, and 90 Days
Reoccurrence of symptomatic, objectively confirmed VTE, defined as recurrent pulmonary embolism (PE) or new or recurrent deep vein thrombosis (DVT) (including symptomatic upper extremity DVT) or VTE related death were analyzed.
Up to 7, 14, 30, and 90 Days
Percentage of Participants With Number of Unplanned Hospital Visits or Physician Office for VTE Symptoms and/or Bleeding
Time Frame: Up to 7, 14, 30 and 90 Days
Percentage of participants of unplanned hospitalization for VTE symptoms or bleeding-related hospital or physician visits were analyzed.
Up to 7, 14, 30 and 90 Days
Mean Combined Duration of Initial and Subsequent Emergency Department (ED) Hospitalization for Any Reason
Time Frame: Up to 30 and 90 Days
Mean combined duration of Initial and subsequent ED Stay and hospitalization for any reason within 30 and 90 days from randomization was analyzed.
Up to 30 and 90 Days
Treatment Satisfaction Assessment in Participants by Anti-clot Treatment Scale (ACTS)
Time Frame: Day 90
ACTS is defined as a validated measure for assessing treatment satisfaction. The ACTS comprised of 2 subscales: Burdens (13 items: Item 1 to 13 [how much of limitation from taking part in vigorous physical activities, limitation from usual activities, bothered by bruising, bothered to avoid other medicines, limitation to diet, daily hassle, occasional hassle, difficult to follow treatment, time-consuming, worrying, frustrating, burden, negative impact on life respectively) and Benefits (4 items: Items 14 to 17 for evaluating confidence, reassurance, satisfaction, positive impact respectively) as a result of anti-clot treatment. The treatment experience scores ranged from 'Not at all' to 'Extremely' on a 5-point Likert scale (psychometric rating); higher scores indicate greater satisfaction with treatment.
Day 90
Percentage of Participants Satisfied Using Site-of-Care Satisfaction Questionnaire
Time Frame: Day 7
The Satisfaction to Site-of-Care Questionnaire (standard-of-care versus early discharge on rivaroxaban therapy) was administered after 7 days on anticoagulant therapy. Satisfaction to Site-of-Care (hospitalization versus home care) rates the participant's level of satisfaction to care and location with care received as well as preference to location of care provided. Participants rated the 3 items of this scale of 1=Very satisfied; 2=Quite satisfied; 3=Neither; 4=Quite dissatisfied; and 5=Very dissatisfied for satisfaction questions and for the 1 preference question responses included 1=In the hospital; 2=In the community; and 3=No preference. Higher score indicates more level of satisfaction.
Day 7

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Bayer

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 15, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
March 22, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
March 22, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
September 11, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 21, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
October 22, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
June 1, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 4, 2018

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • CR107694
  • 39039039APE4001 (Other Identifier: Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings