Lake Washington Vascular VenaSeal™ Post-Market Evaluation (WAVES) (WAVES)
Lake Washington Vascular VenaSeal™ Post-Market Evaluation: WAVES
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Washington
-
Bellevue, Washington, United States, 98004
- Lake Washington Vascular, PLLC
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Key Inclusion Criteria:
- Reflux in at least one target vein;
- One or more of the following symptoms related to a TV: aching, throbbing, heaviness, fatigue, pruritus, night cramps, restlessness, generalized pain or discomfort, swelling;
- CEAP classification of C2 (if symptomatic) through C5;
Key Exclusion Criteria:
- Current, regular use of systemic anticoagulation;
- Previous or suspected deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolus, or active acute superficial thrombophlebitis, or thrombophlebitis migrans;
- Previous treatment such as laser or radiofrequency ablation of venous disease in targeted vein segment;
- Known hypercoagulable disorder;
- Pregnant or breast feeding at enrollment;
- Known sensitivity to cyanoacrylate adhesives;
- Venous treatment in the contralateral limb within the last 30 days, or who require contralateral treatment within three months;
- Planned to undergo additional ipsilateral treatments on the same leg within 3 months following treatment.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Historical Control with Propensity Analysis
|
A medical device kit consisting of seven delivery tools and the proprietary VenaSeal™ Adhesive (Medtronic Cardiovascular, Santa Rosa, CA).
The device is used to treat venous reflux in lower extremity superficial truncal veins for subjects in the treatment arm..
Other Names:
|
|
Experimental: VenaSeal Treatment Arm
|
A medical device kit consisting of seven delivery tools and the proprietary VenaSeal™ Adhesive (Medtronic Cardiovascular, Santa Rosa, CA).
The device is used to treat venous reflux in lower extremity superficial truncal veins for subjects in the treatment arm..
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Complete closure (CC) of the PTVS as assessed by duplex ultrasound 1 month after the index procedure.
Time Frame: 1 month
|
CC of the PTVS as assessed by duplex ultrasound 1 month after the index procedure.
|
1 month
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
CC of the PTVS, as assessed by duplex ultrasound
Time Frame: 1 week and 3 months after treatment
|
1 week and 3 months after treatment
|
|
|
CC of Treated Vein Segments (TVS), expressed on a per-segment basis, as assessed by duplex ultrasound
Time Frame: 1 month and 3 months after the index procedure
|
1 month and 3 months after the index procedure
|
|
|
Quality of life as measured by the venous clinical severity scores (rVCSS)
Time Frame: 1 and 3 months after treatment
|
1 and 3 months after treatment
|
|
|
Quality of life as measured by the Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire (AVVQ)
Time Frame: 1 and 3 months after treatment
|
1 and 3 months after treatment
|
|
|
Quality of life as measured by the EQ-5D
Time Frame: 1 and 3 months after treatment
|
1 and 3 months after treatment
|
|
|
Return to normal activities and return to work; day of procedure is day 0
Time Frame: 1 week, 1 month
|
1 week, 1 month
|
|
|
Need for adjunctive treatment
Time Frame: 3 months
|
Measured in case report form (yes or no, and if yes, the Investigator will specify what the adjunctive measure is).
|
3 months
|
|
Safety and adverse event for below the knee greater saphenous vein treatment
Time Frame: 1 week, 1 month, 3 months
|
1 week, 1 month, 3 months
|
|
|
Safety and adverse events for large diameter TVS defined as veins larger than 8 mm in diameter
Time Frame: 1 week, 1 month, 3 months
|
1 week, 1 month, 3 months
|
|
|
Patient satisfaction
Time Frame: 1 week, 1 month, 3 months
|
At selected visits, the subject will complete a brief questionnaire rating satisfaction with treatment provided and whether the subject would undergo the treatment again.
|
1 week, 1 month, 3 months
|
|
CC of TVS, expressed on a per-segment basis
Time Frame: 1 month and 3 months
|
1 month and 3 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Gloviczki P, Comerota AJ, Dalsing MC, Eklof BG, Gillespie DL, Gloviczki ML, Lohr JM, McLafferty RB, Meissner MH, Murad MH, Padberg FT, Pappas PJ, Passman MA, Raffetto JD, Vasquez MA, Wakefield TW; Society for Vascular Surgery; American Venous Forum. The care of patients with varicose veins and associated chronic venous diseases: clinical practice guidelines of the Society for Vascular Surgery and the American Venous Forum. J Vasc Surg. 2011 May;53(5 Suppl):2S-48S. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.01.079.
- Beebe-Dimmer JL, Pfeifer JR, Engle JS, Schottenfeld D. The epidemiology of chronic venous insufficiency and varicose veins. Ann Epidemiol. 2005 Mar;15(3):175-84. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2004.05.015.
- van den Bos R, Arends L, Kockaert M, Neumann M, Nijsten T. Endovenous therapies of lower extremity varicosities: a meta-analysis. J Vasc Surg. 2009 Jan;49(1):230-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2008.06.030. Epub 2008 Aug 9.
- Geza M, Gloviczki P. Venous Embryology and Anatomy. In: Bergan JJ, editor. The Vein Book: Elsivier Academic Press; 2007.
- van Eekeren RR, Boersma D, de Vries JP, Zeebregts CJ, Reijnen MM. Update of endovenous treatment modalities for insufficient saphenous veins--a review of literature. Semin Vasc Surg. 2014 Jun;27(2):118-36. doi: 10.1053/j.semvascsurg.2015.02.002. Epub 2015 Feb 18.
- Guex JJ. Endovenous chemical (and physical) treatments for varices: what's new? Phlebology. 2014 May;29(1 suppl):45-48. doi: 10.1177/0268355514526331. Epub 2014 May 19.
- Davies HO, Popplewell M, Darvall K, Bate G, Bradbury AW. A review of randomised controlled trials comparing ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy with endothermal ablation for the treatment of great saphenous varicose veins. Phlebology. 2016 May;31(4):234-40. doi: 10.1177/0268355515595194. Epub 2015 Jul 9.
- El-Sheikha J, Carradice D, Nandhra S, Leung C, Smith GE, Campbell B, Chetter IC. Systematic review of compression following treatment for varicose veins. Br J Surg. 2015 Jun;102(7):719-25. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9788. Epub 2015 Apr 2.
- Rasmussen LH, Lawaetz M, Bjoern L, Vennits B, Blemings A, Eklof B. Randomized clinical trial comparing endovenous laser ablation, radiofrequency ablation, foam sclerotherapy and surgical stripping for great saphenous varicose veins. Br J Surg. 2011 Aug;98(8):1079-87. doi: 10.1002/bjs.7555.
- Bootun R, Lane TR, Davies AH. The advent of non-thermal, non-tumescent techniques for treatment of varicose veins. Phlebology. 2016 Feb;31(1):5-14. doi: 10.1177/0268355515593186. Epub 2015 Jun 30.
- Morrison N, Gibson K, McEnroe S, Goldman M, King T, Weiss R, Cher D, Jones A. Randomized trial comparing cyanoacrylate embolization and radiofrequency ablation for incompetent great saphenous veins (VeClose). J Vasc Surg. 2015 Apr;61(4):985-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.11.071. Epub 2015 Jan 31.
- Almeida JI, Javier JJ, Mackay EG, Bautista C, Cher DJ, Proebstle TM. Two-year follow-up of first human use of cyanoacrylate adhesive for treatment of saphenous vein incompetence. Phlebology. 2015 Jul;30(6):397-404. doi: 10.1177/0268355514532455. Epub 2014 Apr 30.
- Proebstle TM, Alm J, Dimitri S, Rasmussen L, Whiteley M, Lawson J, Cher D, Davies A. The European multicenter cohort study on cyanoacrylate embolization of refluxing great saphenous veins. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2015 Jan;3(1):2-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2014.09.001. Epub 2014 Oct 18.
- Vasquez MA, Rabe E, McLafferty RB, Shortell CK, Marston WA, Gillespie D, Meissner MH, Rutherford RB; American Venous Forum Ad Hoc Outcomes Working Group. Revision of the venous clinical severity score: venous outcomes consensus statement: special communication of the American Venous Forum Ad Hoc Outcomes Working Group. J Vasc Surg. 2010 Nov;52(5):1387-96. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.06.161. Epub 2010 Sep 27.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2015-01
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.