Reappraisal of GIK in Acute STEMI by Pre-hospital Administration (REAGIK-STEMI)

October 29, 2015 updated by: Pier Giorgio Masci, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois

Reappraisal of Glucose-insulin-potassium Therapy in Acute St-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction by Pre-hospital Administration

The purpose of this study is:

  1. to assess whether pre-hospital glucose-insulin-potassium (GIK) administration in acute STEMI patients would reduce infarct size and ischemia/reperfusion damage using comprehensive tissue characterization by cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) at an early post-infarction phase.
  2. to explore the putative cardioprotective mechanisms of pre-hospital GIK administration

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Background - After an acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), early and successful myocardial reperfusion with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is the most effective strategy for reducing the infarct size and improving clinical outcome. The process of restoring blood flow to the ischemic myocardium, however, can induce injury per se, paradoxically increasing the extent of final infarction (i.e., reperfusion injury). Research has been focusing for years on a strategy to effectively counteract reperfusion injury and, thereby, reduce the final infarct size with salutary effects on clinical outcome. Robust experimental evidences support Glucose-Insulin-Potassium (GIK) as an effective cardioprotective agent being capable to metabolically protect the myocardium against ischemia and ischemia/reperfusion injury. These benefits are clearly related to the time that GIK is administered in the course of cardiac ischemia, with effectiveness increasing with early administration. However, clinical trials in the reperfusion era have lost the opportunity to translate the beneficial effects seen in the laboratory to the clinical setting, because of the unacceptably prolonged delay from the onset of ischemic symptoms to GIK administration. A properly-designed prospective trial with double-blinded randomization to placebo or GIK in the out-of-hospital setting would straightforwardly overcome this limitation, thereby providing convincing evidences in favor or disfavor of GIK treatment. Notable, GIK is an un-expensive compound, and upon the verification of its efficacy, GIK treatment would be ready for primetime clinical application with matchless cost/effectiveness profile.

Aims

  1. to assess whether pre-hospital GIK administration in acute STEMI patients would reduce infarct size and ischemia/reperfusion damage using comprehensive tissue characterization by cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) at an early post-infarction phase.
  2. to explore the putative cardioprotective mechanisms of pre-hospital GIK administration

Methods - The investigators will conduct a single-center randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded trial for testing the efficacy of pre-hospital GIK administration in patients with acutely reperfused STEMI. The pre-specified primary end-point is the reduction of infarct size, as quantitated by late gadolinium enhancement CMR in the early post-infarction phase. Major secondary end-points are: 1) reduction of ischemia/reperfusion injury quantitated by CMR, and 2) investigation of the putative cardioprotective mechanisms ofGIK treatment in subjects with acute STEMI.

Outlook: The investigators study results, if positive, will persuade the scientific community to reconsider pre-hospital GIK treatment as adjunctive to primary PCI in acute STEMI patients and revitalize the field of metabolism-based cardioprotection. They will illustrate by which mechanisms cardioprotection is achieved in the clinical setting, prompting large prospective multicentre trials to test the efficacy of pre-hospital GIK administration on hard clinical end-points.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
334

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.
  • Name: Pier-Giorgio Masci, MD
  • Phone Number: +41 79-556-48-63
  • Email: pgmasci@gmail.com

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • Switzerland
    • Vaud
      • Lausanne, Vaud, Switzerland, 1011
        • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois - CHUV

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with the diagnosis of acute STEMI
  2. age≥ 18
  3. informed consent for study participation.

Exclusion Criteria evaluated during ambulance transport to primary PCI center:

  1. end-stage renal failure requiring dialysis,
  2. prior MI or coronary revascularization (PCI or CABG),
  3. active malignances,
  4. Pregnancy,
  5. Hemodynamic instability (systolic blood pressure <100mmHg or significant pulmonary congestion defined as O2 saturation <90% on ambient air at pulso-oxymetry)

Exclusion Criteria evaluated after hospital admission at the primary PCI center (all patients will be re-evaluated for study continuation):

  1. total ischemic time more than 8 hours (from symptoms onset to infarct-related artery mechanical re-opening)
  2. evidence at diagnostic angiograms of TIMI flow-grade >1 of infarct-related artery or significant epicardial collaterals to the ischemic myocardium at risk (Rentrop flow-grade >1),
  3. moderate-to-severe renal failure (estimated glomerular filtration rate < 30 ml/min/1.73 m2 by Cockcroft-Gault formula) and
  4. urgent CABG.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Glucose-Insulin-Potassium
Rackley's Glucose-Insulin-Potassium formula consisting of 30% glucose (300 mg/L), 50 units of regular insulin per liter and 80 mEqu of KCL per liter.
Drug: Glucose-Insulin-Potassium
Rackley's GIK formula by continuous I.V. infusion at 1.5 ml/Kg/hour for 12 hours (about 100 ml/hour for a 70 kg patient).
Other Names:
  • GIK
Placebo Comparator: Glucose 5%
Drug: Glucose 5%
Glucose 5% (Placebo) by continuous I.V. infusion at 1.5ml/kg/hour for 12 hours (about 100 ml/hour for 70 Kg patient)
Other Names:
  • Placebo

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Infarct size quantified by Late Gadolinium Enhancement using Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
Time Frame: 12 to 72 hours after the acute event
12 to 72 hours after the acute event

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The severity of ischemia/reperfusion injury (myocardial edema, microvascular obstruction and myocardial hemorrhage)
Time Frame: 12 to 72 hours after the acute event
The of ischemia/reperfusion injury will be assessed by multiparametric CMR
12 to 72 hours after the acute event
Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events
Time Frame: at 7-day, 30-day, 4-month and at 1-year follow-up
at 7-day, 30-day, 4-month and at 1-year follow-up
Post-infarction Remodeling
Time Frame: 4-month follow-up
Adverse post-infarction remodeling is defined as increase of LV end-systolic volume more than 15% between the first CMR (12 to 72 hours after the acute event) and second CMR (4-month after the acute event)
4-month follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Pier-Giorgio Masci, MD, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois
  • Study Director: Juerg Schwitter, MD, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois
  • Study Chair: Pierre Vogt, MD, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vadois
  • Study Chair: Eric Eeckhout, MD, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois
  • Study Chair: Juan-Fernando Iglesias, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois
  • Study Chair: Olivier Muller, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois
  • Study Chair: Olivier Hugli, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois
  • Study Chair: Fabrice Dami, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois
  • Study Chair: Pierre Monney, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
February 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
February 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
October 28, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 29, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
October 30, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
October 30, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 29, 2015

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
October 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 32003B_159727

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings