Endodrill vs. Conventional Biopsy. Diagnostics and Genetic Analysis

March 13, 2020 updated by: Martin Jeremiasen, Region Skane

Endodrill vs. Conventional Biopsy. Diagnostics and Genetic Analysis in Tumors of the Distal Esophagus and Cardia

Endodrill is a new instrument for biopsy sampling in the GI-channel. The purposes of this study are as follows:

  • Compare the Endodrill instrument with conventional biopsy forceps in terms of ability to establish the correct diagnosis based on collected biopsies of tumors in the upper GI tract.
  • Based on the quality of the collected tissue samples we want to evaluate which instrument generates the most useful material for genetic studies of the tumor.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Terminated

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Endodrill is a newly constructed biopsy tool for flexible endoscopic use. It uses a drilling motion within a casing to harvest solid biopsies from tissue through the biopsy channel of a conventional flexible endoscope. It was originally designed for sampling of tissue from submucosal lesions. The investigators´ first study of the instrument is now finished. Endodrill is safe to use and generates more submucosal tissue compared to biopsies with a conventional biopsy forceps.

In this study the investigators want to compare the Endodrill instrument´s ability to obtain representative tissue samples from tumors in the distal esophagus and cardia with a conventional biopsy forceps. In addition the investigators want to compare the tissue samples in terms of weight, quality, artefacts and whether either instrument is more suited for collecting tissue for genetic analysis. Such analysis will be conducted with Next-Generation Sequensing (NGS) of the whole exome, Whole Exome Sequensing (WES). In the event of positive results from these analysis the investigators will also conduct RNA-sequencing of the tumor tissue in order to start pre-operative mapping of genetic abnormalities.

20 patients will be enrolled for this study. For each patient the investigators will collect 10 biopsies, 5 biopsies each with conventional biopsy and the Endodrill instrument respectively. The order will be randomized for each patient. For each specific biopsy the investigator will choose a particular site on the suspected tumor tissue without knowing which instrument that will be used for the biopsy. This procedure will be repeated for all 10 biopsies.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
7

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Sweden
    • Skane
      • Lund, Skane, Sweden, 22185
        • University Hospital of Lund

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 85 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients diagnosed with adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus/cardia or stomach capable of stating a formal consent to participate in the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Mental illness
  • Extreme co-morbidity (ASA >3)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Conventional biopsy
4 out of 8 biopsies taken with a conventional biopsy forceps from the tumor tissue in the distal esophagus and cardia. The biopsies will be taken in random order "blinded" for the person performing the examination. 1 additional biopsy will be taken from the tumor tissue in order to be evaluated for appropriateness of further genetic analysis. Both type of biopsies will be taken from the same patient. In total 10 biopsies per patient.
Device: Conventional Biopsy forceps
Using a conventional biopsy forceps for taking tissue biopsies in the GI tract. The investigators will use conventional biopsy forceps in order to sample high quality biopsies from tumor tissue in the distal esophagus and cardia. The investigators will also investigate to what extent the conventional biopsy forceps can generate biopsies with the correct diagnosis and also evaluate the possibility for genetic studies of the harvested tumor tissue.
Active Comparator: Endodrill biopsy
4 out of 8 biopsies taken with the Endodrill instrument from the tumor tissue in the distal esophagus and cardia. The biopsies will be taken in random order "blinded" for the person performing the examination. 1 additional biopsy will be taken from the tumor tissue in order to be evaluated for appropriateness of further genetic analysis. Both type of biopsies will be taken from the same patient. In total 10 biopsies per patient.
Device: Endodrill Biopsy
Testing a new device for taking tissue biopsies in the GI tract. The investigators will use the Endodrill instrument in order to sample high quality biopsies from tumor tissue in the distal esophagus and cardia. The investigators will also investigate to what extent the Endodrill instrument can generate biopsies with the correct diagnosis and also evaluate the possibility for genetic studies of the harvested tumor tissue.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Highest proportion (number) of representative biopsies for diagnostic purposes from the tumor tissue.
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Number of genetic point mutations in tissue harvested from esophageal neoplasms prior to neoadjuvant oncological treatment.
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months
Number of fusion genes in tissue harvested from esophageal neoplasms prior to neoadjuvant oncological treatment.
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Region Skane

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
May 30, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
October 27, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 7, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
November 10, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 17, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 13, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • Endodrill I

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Esophageal Neoplasm

Clinical Trials on Conventional Biopsy forceps

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings