Endodrill vs. Conventional Biopsy. Diagnostics and Genetic Analysis

March 13, 2020 updated by: Martin Jeremiasen, Region Skane

Endodrill vs. Conventional Biopsy. Diagnostics and Genetic Analysis in Tumors of the Distal Esophagus and Cardia

Endodrill is a new instrument for biopsy sampling in the GI-channel. The purposes of this study are as follows:

  • Compare the Endodrill instrument with conventional biopsy forceps in terms of ability to establish the correct diagnosis based on collected biopsies of tumors in the upper GI tract.
  • Based on the quality of the collected tissue samples we want to evaluate which instrument generates the most useful material for genetic studies of the tumor.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Endodrill is a newly constructed biopsy tool for flexible endoscopic use. It uses a drilling motion within a casing to harvest solid biopsies from tissue through the biopsy channel of a conventional flexible endoscope. It was originally designed for sampling of tissue from submucosal lesions. The investigators´ first study of the instrument is now finished. Endodrill is safe to use and generates more submucosal tissue compared to biopsies with a conventional biopsy forceps.

In this study the investigators want to compare the Endodrill instrument´s ability to obtain representative tissue samples from tumors in the distal esophagus and cardia with a conventional biopsy forceps. In addition the investigators want to compare the tissue samples in terms of weight, quality, artefacts and whether either instrument is more suited for collecting tissue for genetic analysis. Such analysis will be conducted with Next-Generation Sequensing (NGS) of the whole exome, Whole Exome Sequensing (WES). In the event of positive results from these analysis the investigators will also conduct RNA-sequencing of the tumor tissue in order to start pre-operative mapping of genetic abnormalities.

20 patients will be enrolled for this study. For each patient the investigators will collect 10 biopsies, 5 biopsies each with conventional biopsy and the Endodrill instrument respectively. The order will be randomized for each patient. For each specific biopsy the investigator will choose a particular site on the suspected tumor tissue without knowing which instrument that will be used for the biopsy. This procedure will be repeated for all 10 biopsies.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

7

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Skane
      • Lund, Skane, Sweden, 22185
        • University Hospital of Lund

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 85 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients diagnosed with adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus/cardia or stomach capable of stating a formal consent to participate in the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Mental illness
  • Extreme co-morbidity (ASA >3)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Conventional biopsy
4 out of 8 biopsies taken with a conventional biopsy forceps from the tumor tissue in the distal esophagus and cardia. The biopsies will be taken in random order "blinded" for the person performing the examination. 1 additional biopsy will be taken from the tumor tissue in order to be evaluated for appropriateness of further genetic analysis. Both type of biopsies will be taken from the same patient. In total 10 biopsies per patient.
Using a conventional biopsy forceps for taking tissue biopsies in the GI tract. The investigators will use conventional biopsy forceps in order to sample high quality biopsies from tumor tissue in the distal esophagus and cardia. The investigators will also investigate to what extent the conventional biopsy forceps can generate biopsies with the correct diagnosis and also evaluate the possibility for genetic studies of the harvested tumor tissue.
Active Comparator: Endodrill biopsy
4 out of 8 biopsies taken with the Endodrill instrument from the tumor tissue in the distal esophagus and cardia. The biopsies will be taken in random order "blinded" for the person performing the examination. 1 additional biopsy will be taken from the tumor tissue in order to be evaluated for appropriateness of further genetic analysis. Both type of biopsies will be taken from the same patient. In total 10 biopsies per patient.
Testing a new device for taking tissue biopsies in the GI tract. The investigators will use the Endodrill instrument in order to sample high quality biopsies from tumor tissue in the distal esophagus and cardia. The investigators will also investigate to what extent the Endodrill instrument can generate biopsies with the correct diagnosis and also evaluate the possibility for genetic studies of the harvested tumor tissue.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Highest proportion (number) of representative biopsies for diagnostic purposes from the tumor tissue.
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Number of genetic point mutations in tissue harvested from esophageal neoplasms prior to neoadjuvant oncological treatment.
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months
Number of fusion genes in tissue harvested from esophageal neoplasms prior to neoadjuvant oncological treatment.
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 30, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 27, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 7, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

November 10, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 17, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 13, 2020

Last Verified

March 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Esophageal Neoplasm

Clinical Trials on Conventional Biopsy forceps

Subscribe