Stereotactic Infarct Tissue Aspiration for Malignant Infarction of Middle Cerebral Artery (SMART)

May 8, 2018 updated by: Hui-Sheng Chen, General Hospital of Shenyang Military Region

Stereotactic Infarct Tissue Aspiration (SITA) for Malignant Infarction of Middle Cerebral Artery

Malignant middle cerebral artery infarction(MMCI) has a high rate of disability and mortality. At present, there is no effective treatment except for craniotomy decompression, but the controversy of the craniotomy decompression still exists. The project is a prospective, randomized, single center, open label, clinical controlled trail. The eligible patients for enrollment are as follows: (1) malignant cerebral artery infarction within 48h onset; (2) craniotomy decompression can not be performed due to the contraindications, or refused by the patient or relatives. The patients are randomly assigned into 2 groups: (1)Medical therapy group: receiving osmotic therapy with mannitol and glycerol fructose，anti-platelet treatment, statins, and other symptomatic treatments such as controlling blood pressure, blood sugar, and infection, tracheal intubation or incision, etc; (2) Stereotactic infarct tissue aspiration (SITA) group: on the basis of medical treatment, receiving minimally invasive aspiration of infarct tissue 24-48 hours after stroke attacked. This study is aimed at comparing the efficacy and safety of of SITA in patients with MMCI.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Terminated

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Malignant middle cerebral artery infarction (MMCI) has a fatality rate of up to 80%, due to massive brain edema, increased intracranial pressure, and cerebral herniation. The herniation-induced death usually occured during the first week, despite aggressive osmotherapy with mannitol or hypertonic saline, sedation, and eventually hyperventilation, buffers, or hypothermia. A growing evidence show that decompression craniectomy (DC) can produce a significant reduction in mortality rate and an improvement in neurological outcome, but the controversy of the DC still exists. There is an urgent need to find a more effective treatment method. Given that brain tissue necrosis-induced edema and cerebral herniation is the key reason of fatality and disability of MMCI patients, the investigators argue that the reduction of cerebral tissue volume by stereotactic infarct tissue aspiration (SITA) is likely to reach the decompression effect similar to the DC. Recently, the investigators performed SITA in 2 MMCI patients who were qualified for decompressive craniectomy, but refused by patient relatives, and their neurological function significantly improved.

The project is a prospective, randomized, single center, open label, clinical controlled trail. The eligible patients for enrollment are as follows: (1)ages from 40 to 90 years old; (2) malignant cerebral artery infarction within 48h onset; (3) craniotomy decompression can not be performed due to the contraindications, or refused by the patient or relatives. The patients are randomly assigned into 2 groups: (1) Medical therapy group: receiving osmotic therapy with mannitol and glycerol fructose，anti-platelet treatment, statins, and other symptomatic treatments such as controlling blood pressure, blood sugar, and infection, and tracheal intubation or incision, etc; (2) SITA group: receiving minimally invasive aspiration of infarct tissue 24-48 hours after stroke attacked on the basis of medical treatment. This study is aimed at comparing the efficacy and safety of of SITA in patients with MMCI.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
12

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • China
    • Liaoning
      • Shenyang, Liaoning, China, 110840
        • General Hospital of Shenyang Military Region

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years to 90 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. ages from 40 to 90
  2. within 48 hours of onset
  3. brain imaging confirmed malignant middle cerebral artery infarction (DWI+MRA)
  4. infarction volume > 145ml
  5. craniotomy decompression can not be performed due to the contraindications, or refused by the patient or relatives
  6. signed informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. hemorrhagic stroke
  2. severe infection or severe disfunction of liver, kidney, hematopoietic system, endocrine system and other serious diseases
  3. other clinical trials within 3 months
  4. a negative attitude towards SITA by patient or relatives
  5. other conditions not eligible for the trail judged by the researchers.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Stereotactic infarct tissue aspiration
Patients receive the stereotactic infarct tissue aspiration 24-48 hours after cerebral infarction beside medical therapy.
Procedure: Stereotactic infarct tissue aspiration
The patient posed supine position to expose local skin and puncture point was located at 6.5 cm behind the hairline of the lesion side, and 5.0 cm lateral of midline. After routine skin preparation and disinfection, 5% lidocaine 2-5 ml was injected for local anesthesia. The skin was cut to expose periosteum by a scalpel. After skull was vertically drilled through with a 6mm diameter hole, a sterile tube with a needle in tube was put about 8 cm into centrum semiovale. The needle was put out and about 50ml necrosis brain tissue was aspirated by a 20 ml syringe. The tube was fixed into the skin about 2 cm after subcutaneous tunnel, and connected to the drainage bag. Surgical area was sterilized and wrapped by sterile gauze bandage.
Other: Medical therapy
osmotic therapy with mannitol and glycerol fructose，anti-platelet treatment, statins, and other symptomatic treatments such as controlling blood pressure, blood sugar, and infection, and tracheal intubation or incision, etc
Sham Comparator: Medical therapy
osmotic therapy with mannitol and glycerol fructose，anti-platelet treatment, statins, and other symptomatic treatments such as controlling blood pressure, blood sugar, and infection, and tracheal intubation or incision, etc;
Other: Medical therapy
osmotic therapy with mannitol and glycerol fructose，anti-platelet treatment, statins, and other symptomatic treatments such as controlling blood pressure, blood sugar, and infection, and tracheal intubation or incision, etc

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Modified Rankin Scale(mRS) 0-3 vs mRS 4-6
Time Frame: 90±7days
90±7days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
National Institute of Health stroke scale(NIHSS)
Time Frame: 14±2days
NIHSS score improvement
14±2days
Mean survival time
Time Frame: 1 year
1 year
death due to any reasons
Time Frame: 90±7days
90±7days
mRS 0-4 compared with mRS 5 or 6
Time Frame: 90±7days
90±7days

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
The number of Local hemorrhage cases
Time Frame: 14±2 days
14±2 days
The number of intracranial hemorrhage cases
Time Frame: 14±2 days
14±2 days
Major cardiovascular events
Time Frame: during the surgery
during the surgery
The number of intracranial infection cases
Time Frame: 14±2 days
14±2 days
The number of Local infection cases
Time Frame: 14±2 days
14±2 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
General Hospital of Shenyang Military Region

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Chair: Huisheng Chen Jing Qiu, PhD, Director

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
December 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
April 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
July 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
November 11, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 17, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
November 20, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 14, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 8, 2018

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • k(2015)32

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Middle Cerebral Artery Infarction

Clinical Trials on Stereotactic infarct tissue aspiration

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings