A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Piracetam on Aphasia After Acute Ischemic Cerebral Artery Stroke

August 28, 2013 updated by: UCB S.A. - Pharma Sector

Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo Controlled, Two Parallel Group Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Piracetam, 12 g Intravenous (IV) Infusion Within 7 Hour (h) Post Stroke Onset, Followed by 12 g/d for 4 Weeks (IV Ampoules, Oral Solution) and 4.8 g/d for 8 Weeks (Tablets) in Adult Subjects With an Acute Ischemic Middle Cerebral Artery Stroke

The aim of this study was to confirm the efficacy of piracetam after 12 weeks of treatment on the aphasic status of subjects suffering from aphasia after acute ischemic middle cerebral artery stroke and having received their medication within 7 h post-stroke onset.

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

An interim analysis was performed, as planned in the protocol, on the primary efficacy measure (Day 84 FAST Score) for aphasic subjects. This interim analysis indicated that there was less than a 20 % chance of showing a 15 % difference between placebo and piracetam at the end of the trial, under the assumption that there was indeed a 15 % difference. Thus, it was the decision of UCB to stop further recruitment into this study.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

571

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Buenos Aires, Argentina
        • 050
      • Buenos Aires, Argentina
        • 051
      • Inssbruck, Austria
        • 004
      • Linz, Austria
        • 001
      • Linz, Austria
        • 003
      • Antwerpen, Belgium
        • 102
      • Antwerpen, Belgium
        • 103
      • Brussels, Belgium
        • 104
      • Genk, Belgium
        • 107
      • Charleville-Mezieres, France
        • 150
      • Nice cedex 1, France
        • 152
      • Magdeburg, Germany
        • 201
      • Minden, Germany
        • 200
      • Nidda-bad-Salzhausen, Germany
        • 203
      • Saarbrucken, Germany
        • 202
      • Athens, Greece
        • 251
      • Athens, Greece
        • 252
      • Budapest, Greece
        • 302
      • Budapest, Greece
        • 303
      • Budapest, Greece
        • 305
      • Thessaloniki, Greece
        • 250
      • Budapest, Hungary
        • 300
      • Debrecen, Hungary
        • 304
      • Miskolc, Hungary
        • 301
      • Perugia, Italy
        • 350
      • Bergen, Norway
        • 750
      • Bialystok, Poland
        • 455
      • Krakow, Poland
        • 454
      • Lodz, Poland
        • 456
      • Poznan, Poland
        • 451
      • Warsaw, Poland
        • 450
      • Warszawa, Poland
        • 452
      • Singapore, Singapore
        • 600
      • Singapore, Singapore
        • 601
      • Madrid, Spain
        • 501
      • Madrid, Spain
        • 502
      • Malaga, Spain
        • 503
      • Terrassa, Spain
        • 500
      • Stockholm, Sweden
        • 550
      • Taipei, Taiwan
        • 700
      • Edirne, Turkey
        • 654
      • Eskisehir, Turkey
        • 650
      • Istanbul, Turkey
        • 652
      • Istanbul, Turkey
        • 653

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

50 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male or female adults ≥ 50 years
  • Considered as reliable and mentally capable of adhering to the protocol
  • Signed informed consent (by the subject or the next of kin) or inclusion of the subject as per Ethics Committee approved procedures
  • Clinical diagnosis of a middle cerebral artery ischemic stroke
  • A disabling motor deficit at the moment of inclusion, defined as having a total Middle Cerebral Artery (MCA) score between 15 and 65
  • Treated before 7 h (6 h and 59 minutes) after the estimated stroke onset
  • If the subject had a stroke during the night, the onset of stroke is assumed to be the last time the subject was seen awake and normal, or last time the subject remembered he/she was awake and normal
  • Being aphasic, defined as having an Aphasia Severity Rating (ASR) score of < 3

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Stupor or coma: < 10 on the item consciousness of the Middle Cerebral Artery (MCA) scale
  • A previous stroke with clinical sequel or a previous stroke with aphasia (even in case of complete recovery from aphasia)
  • A medical or neurological disease interfering with the assessments and causing a clear deficit:
  • 1. in functional ability or autonomy
  • 2. in motor function
  • 3. in cognitive capacities
  • 4. in language
  • A systemic disease with neurological symptoms
  • A life threatening disease with life expectancy of less than 1 year
  • Renal insufficiency (creatinine > 2 mg/100 ml or > 180 µmol/l; creatinine had to be determined as soon as possible but not before inclusion)
  • Any concomitant treatments that could not be stopped at the moment of inclusion or that had been started after the onset of the stroke and before inclusion (as long as not considered by the advisory board as effective drug), such as:
  • 1. Cerebro-vascular active products: bufenine, buflomedil, cinnarizine, codergocrinemesilate, citicholine, cyclandelate, cyprodemanol, deanolacetamidobenzoate, flunarizine, ginkgo-biloba extr., inositolnicotinate, isoxsuprine, meclofenoxate, naftidrofuryloxalate, nicergoline, nicotinic acid (smoking is allowed), nimodipine, pentifylline, papaverine, pentoxifylline, piracetam, pyrisuccideanoldimaleate, pyritinol, raubasine, vincamine, viquidil, xantinolnicotinate. A list of these drugs with generic and brand name, adapted to each of the participating countries accompanied the Case Report Form (CRF)
  • 2. Thrombolytics: recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator (alteplase) (rt- PA), streptokinase, urokinase, ancrod
  • 3. Hemodilution
  • 4. Glucose infusion >5 %
  • Subjects known to not being able to be followed for 12 weeks
  • Known alcohol or drug addiction or abuse
  • Subjects previously enrolled in this trial
  • Known allergy/intolerance to piracetam/excipients
  • Lactation, pregnancy, or pregnancy potential, unless using an effective means of contraception
  • Illiterate subjects (subjects not able to read prior to stroke)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Piracetam

IV infusion 12 g piracetam in 60 ml

IV Ampoules 3 g piracetam in 15 ml

Oral solution 33 % piracetam (bottle of 125 ml)

Oral tablets 1200 mg piracetam (blisters of 10 tablets)

Placebo Comparator: Placebo

IV infusion 12 g placebo in 60 ml

IV Ampoules 3 g placebo in 15 ml

Oral solution 33% placebo (bottle of 125 ml)

Oral tablets 1200 mg placebo (blisters of 10 tablets)

All IV forms were identical in presentation, size and color to allow a double blind design.

All oral forms were identical in shape, size, color and taste to allow a double blind design.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The percentage of subjects recovering from aphasia as per the Frenchay Aphasia Screening Test (FAST) score at Day 84
Time Frame: Day 84

FAST describes the presence, absence or severity of aphasia, but does not differentiate types of aphasia.

Comprehension, expression and reading were main score targets tested by picture card with attached reading card. The FAST score covered a range from 0-20. Subjects with FAST score ≤13 where considered as aphasic and subjects with FAST score > 13 were considered as non-aphasic.

There were 2 tests of comprehension and 2 tests of expression and 1 of reading, however the reading test was not included in the primary efficacy variable.

Day 84

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Middle Cerebral Artery infarction scale (MCA) score at Day 84
Time Frame: Day 84
The MCA was developed for clinical trial evaluation of middle cerebral artery stroke. The scale evaluates 10 items: consciousness, verbal communication, elevation of the arm, finger and thumb movements, arm tone, deviation of head and eyes, facial movements, elevation of the leg, dorsiflexion of the foot and leg tone. Weighted scores for each item provide a maximum score of 100.
Day 84
Total Barthel Index (BI) score at Day 84
Time Frame: Day 84

This scale evaluates 10 items: eating, moving from (wheel) chair to bed and back, personal hygiene, using the lavatory, bathing, walking/wheelchair, stairs, getting dressed/undressed, controlling bowel motion, controlling bladder.

Weighted scores for each item vary between 0 and 15 to provide a maximum score of 100. Subjects who can perform all specified activities without help receive a score of 100. Even though they are independent in daily activities, they could remain handicapped by neurologic impairments.

Day 84
Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) score at Day 84
Time Frame: Day 84

The MMSE is divided into two sections, the first of which requires vocal responses only and covers orientation, memory and attention: the maximum score is 21.

The second part tests ability to name, follow verbal and written commands, write a sentence spontaneously and copy a complex polygon: the maximum score is 9. Maximum score of the two parts is 30. The test is not timed. A score ≤ 23 indicates that the subject is demented.

Day 84

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: UCB Clinical Trial Call Center, +1 877 822 9493

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 1998

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2001

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2001

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 18, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 20, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

June 21, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

August 30, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 28, 2013

Last Verified

August 1, 2013

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Acute Ischaemic Middle Cerebral Artery Stroke

Clinical Trials on Placebo

Subscribe