A Study to Evaluate the Safety and Clinical Response of Subretinal Administration of CNTO 2476 in Participants With Geographic Atrophy (PRELUDE)

April 25, 2025 updated by: Janssen Research & Development, LLC

A Phase 2b, Multicenter, Double-masked, Randomized Study Evaluating the Safety and Clinical Response of Subretinal Administration of CNTO 2476 in Subjects With Visual Acuity Impairment Associated With Geographic Atrophy Secondary to Age Related Macular Degeneration

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and performance profile of the suprachoroidal surgical approach and the Delivery System.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This is a multicenter (when more than one hospital or medical school team work on a medical research study) study which includes an initial unmasked safety phase. The duration of participation in the study for each participant is approximately 3 years. Efficacy will be evaluated at 6 months, 12 months and annually thereafter. Participants' safety will be monitored throughout the study.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
21

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • California
      • Arcadia, California, United States
    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States
    • Kentucky
      • Lexington, Kentucky, United States
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States
    • Michigan
      • Royal Oak, Michigan, United States
    • Ohio
      • Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
    • Pennsylvania
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
    • Texas
      • Dallas, Texas, United States

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

55 years to 90 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of geographic atrophy (GA) secondary to age-related macular degeneration (AMD) confirmed within 45 days prior to initial randomization verified by the central reading center
  • Study eyes will have a best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of 20/80 to 20/800 [Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) log of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) value 0.6-1.6]. The treatment eye will be that with the worse BCVA at Screening. If BCVA is clinically equivalent, the eye with the larger GA determines the study eye
  • Participant is a suitable candidate for ophthalmologic surgery, is willing and able to comply with the surgical procedure, scheduled visits, treatment plan, laboratory tests and other study procedures. Participant has met criteria of the surgery center anti-coagulation protocol, if applicable
  • Each participant must sign an informed consent form (ICF) indicating that he or she understands the purpose of and procedures required for the study and are willing to participate in the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participant has a history of neovascular ("wet") AMD in the treatment eye, including evidence of retinal pigment epithelium rips or evidence of subretinal or choroidal neovascularization or fluid. In cases where imaging is inconclusive, review of the case with the study site, considering history and imaging will determine eligibility. History or evidence of neovascular AMD in the fellow eye is allowed, if anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy has not been required for at least 8 weeks prior to Screening
  • Geographic atrophy secondary to any causes other than AMD in either eye
  • A diagnosis of glaucoma with an intraocular pressure (IOP) greater than or equal to (>=) 25 millimeter of mercury (mmHg) while being treated with an ocular hypotensive drug. Treatment should be no more than 1 drug preparation/combination, which can contain 1 or 2 ocular hypotensive active ingredients; participants receiving more than 2 ocular hypotensive active ingredients are excluded
  • Nuclear sclerotic cataract, cortical spoking, posterior subcapsular cataract above Grade 2 per Age Related Eye Disease Study (AREDS) scale or any other ophthalmologic condition that reduces the clarity of the media that, in the opinion of the investigator or reading center, interferes with ophthalmologic examination (example, corneal abnormalities, inadequate pupillary dilation), surgery or imaging in the study eye
  • Myopia greater than minus (>-) 8 diopters and participants with greater than (>) 4 diopters of astigmatism, and greater than plus (>+) 10 diopters of hyperopia

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Open-Label Safety Run-in Phase: Treatment Group
Participants will receive CNTO 2476 3.0 x 10^5 cells in 50 microliter (mcL). CNTO 2476 will be delivered using the custom-designed Delivery System.
Drug: CNTO 2476 3.0 x 10^5 cells
Participants will receive a single subretinal administration of CNTO 2476 3.0 x 10^5 cells in 50 microliter (mcL) given by subretinal Delivery System.
Device: Subretinal Delivery System
Participants will receive CNTO 2476 by using the Delivery System.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Total Letters Score at Month 1- Treated Eye
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 1
Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was assessed in the study eye (Treated eye). BCVA measurements were made using the logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) visual acuity testing charts. Each letter on the chart has a score value of 0.02 log units. Since there were 5 letters per line, the total score for a line on the logMAR chart represented a change of 0.1 log units. The formula for calculating the logMAR BCVA score was: 1.7 - 0.02*number of letters read. A lower BCVA score indicates better vision. A negative change score indicates improvement.
Baseline and Month 1
Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity Total Letters Score at Month 2- Treated Eye
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 2
BCVA was assessed in the study eye (Treated eye). BCVA measurements were made using the logMAR visual acuity testing charts. Each letter on the chart has a score value of 0.02 log units. Since there were 5 letters per line, the total score for a line on the logMAR chart represented a change of 0.1 log units. The formula for calculating the logMAR BCVA score was: 1.7 - 0.02*number of letters read. A lower BCVA score indicates better vision. A negative change score indicates improvement.
Baseline and Month 2
Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity Total Letters Score at Month 3- Treated Eye
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 3
BCVA was assessed in the study eye (Treated eye). BCVA measurements were made using the logMAR visual acuity testing charts. Each letter on the chart has a score value of 0.02 log units. Since there were 5 letters per line, the total score for a line on the logMAR chart represented a change of 0.1 log units. The formula for calculating the logMAR BCVA score was: 1.7 - 0.02*number of letters read. A lower BCVA score indicates better vision. A negative change score indicates improvement.
Baseline and Month 3
Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity Total Letters Score at Month 6- Treated Eye
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 6
BCVA was assessed in the study eye (Treated eye). BCVA measurements were made using the logMAR visual acuity testing charts. Each letter on the chart has a score value of 0.02 log units. Since there were 5 letters per line, the total score for a line on the logMAR chart represented a change of 0.1 log units. The formula for calculating the logMAR BCVA score was: 1.7 - 0.02*number of letters read. A lower BCVA score indicates better vision. A negative change score indicates improvement.
Baseline and Month 6
Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity Total Letters Score at Month 12- Treated Eye
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 12
BCVA was assessed in the study eye (Treated eye). BCVA measurements were made using the logMAR visual acuity testing charts. Each letter on the chart has a score value of 0.02 log units. Since there were 5 letters per line, the total score for a line on the logMAR chart represented a change of 0.1 log units. The formula for calculating the logMAR BCVA score was: 1.7 - 0.02*number of letters read. A lower BCVA score indicates better vision. A negative change score indicates improvement.
Baseline and Month 12
Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity Total Letters Score at Month 18- Treated Eye
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 18
BCVA was assessed in the study eye (Treated eye). BCVA measurements were made using the logMAR visual acuity testing charts. Each letter on the chart has a score value of 0.02 log units. Since there were 5 letters per line, the total score for a line on the logMAR chart represented a change of 0.1 log units. The formula for calculating the logMAR BCVA score was: 1.7 - 0.02*number of letters read. A lower BCVA score indicates better vision. A negative change score indicates improvement.
Baseline and Month 18
Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Total Letters Score at Month 24- Treated Eye
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 24
BCVA was assessed in the study eye (Treated eye). BCVA measurements were made using the logMAR visual acuity testing charts. Each letter on the chart has a score value of 0.02 log units. Since there were 5 letters per line, the total score for a line on the logMAR chart represented a change of 0.1 log units. The formula for calculating the logMAR BCVA score was: 1.7 - 0.02*number of letters read. A lower BCVA score indicates better vision. A negative change score indicates improvement.
Baseline and Month 24
Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Total Letters Score at Month 30- Treated Eye
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 30
BCVA was assessed in the study eye (Treated eye). BCVA measurements were made using the logMAR visual acuity testing charts. Each letter on the chart has a score value of 0.02 log units. Since there were 5 letters per line, the total score for a line on the logMAR chart represented a change of 0.1 log units. The formula for calculating the logMAR BCVA score was: 1.7 - 0.02*number of letters read. A lower BCVA score indicates better vision. A negative change score indicates improvement.
Baseline and Month 30
Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Total Letters Score at Month 36- Treated Eye
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 36
BCVA was assessed in the study eye (Treated eye). BCVA measurements were made using the logMAR visual acuity testing charts. Each letter on the chart has a score value of 0.02 log units. Since there were 5 letters per line, the total score for a line on the logMAR chart represented a change of 0.1 log units. The formula for calculating the logMAR BCVA score was: 1.7 - 0.02*number of letters read. A lower BCVA score indicates better vision. A negative change score indicates improvement.
Baseline and Month 36
Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Total Letters Score at Month 1- Fellow Eye
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 1
BCVA was assessed in the fellow eye. BCVA measurements were made using the logMAR visual acuity testing charts. Each letter on the chart has a score value of 0.02 log units. Since there were 5 letters per line, the total score for a line on the logMAR chart represented a change of 0.1 log units. The formula for calculating the logMAR BCVA score was: 1.7 - 0.02*number of letters read. A lower BCVA score indicates better vision. A negative change score indicates improvement.
Baseline and Month 1
Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity Total Letters Score at Month 2- Fellow Eye
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 2
BCVA was assessed in the fellow eye. BCVA measurements were made using the logMAR visual acuity testing charts. Each letter on the chart has a score value of 0.02 log units. Since there were 5 letters per line, the total score for a line on the logMAR chart represented a change of 0.1 log units. The formula for calculating the logMAR BCVA score was: 1.7 - 0.02*number of letters read. A lower BCVA score indicates better vision. A negative change score indicates improvement.
Baseline and Month 2
Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity Total Letters Score at Month 3- Fellow Eye
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 3
BCVA was assessed in the fellow eye. BCVA measurements were made using the logMAR visual acuity testing charts. Each letter on the chart has a score value of 0.02 log units. Since there were 5 letters per line, the total score for a line on the logMAR chart represented a change of 0.1 log units. The formula for calculating the logMAR BCVA score was: 1.7 - 0.02*number of letters read. A lower BCVA score indicates better vision. A negative change score indicates improvement.
Baseline and Month 3
Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity Total Letters Score at Month 6- Fellow Eye
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 6
BCVA was assessed in the fellow eye. BCVA measurements were made using the logMAR visual acuity testing charts. Each letter on the chart has a score value of 0.02 log units. Since there were 5 letters per line, the total score for a line on the logMAR chart represented a change of 0.1 log units. The formula for calculating the logMAR BCVA score was: 1.7 - 0.02*number of letters read. A lower BCVA score indicates better vision. A negative change score indicates improvement.
Baseline and Month 6
Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity Total Letters Score at Month 12- Fellow Eye
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 12
BCVA was assessed in the fellow eye. BCVA measurements were made using logMAR visual acuity testing charts. Each letter on the chart has a score value of 0.02 log units. Since there are 5 letters per line, the total score for a line on the logMAR chart represents a change of 0.1 log units. The formula for calculating the logMAR BCVA score is: 1.7 - 0.02*number of letters read. A lower BCVA score indicates better vision. A negative change score indicates improvement.
Baseline and Month 12
Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity Total Letters Score at Month 18- Fellow Eye
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 18
BCVA was assessed in the fellow eye. BCVA measurements were made using the logMAR visual acuity testing charts. Each letter on the chart has a score value of 0.02 log units. Since there were 5 letters per line, the total score for a line on the logMAR chart represented a change of 0.1 log units. The formula for calculating the logMAR BCVA score was: 1.7 - 0.02*number of letters read. A lower BCVA score indicates better vision. A negative change score indicates improvement.
Baseline and Month 18
Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity Total Letters Score at Month 24- Fellow Eye
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 24
BCVA was assessed in the fellow eye. BCVA measurements were made using the logMAR visual acuity testing charts. Each letter on the chart has a score value of 0.02 log units. Since there were 5 letters per line, the total score for a line on the logMAR chart represented a change of 0.1 log units. The formula for calculating the logMAR BCVA score was: 1.7 - 0.02*number of letters read. A lower BCVA score indicates better vision. A negative change score indicates improvement.
Baseline and Month 24
Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity Total Letters Score at Month 30- Fellow Eye
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 30
BCVA was assessed in the fellow eye. BCVA measurements were made using the logMAR visual acuity testing charts. Each letter on the chart has a score value of 0.02 log units. Since there were 5 letters per line, the total score for a line on the logMAR chart represented a change of 0.1 log units. The formula for calculating the logMAR BCVA score was: 1.7 - 0.02*number of letters read. A lower BCVA score indicates better vision. A negative change score indicates improvement.
Baseline and Month 30
Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity Total Letters Score at Month 36- Fellow Eye
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 36
BCVA was assessed in the fellow eye. BCVA measurements were made using the logMAR visual acuity testing charts. Each letter on the chart has a score value of 0.02 log units. Since there were 5 letters per line, the total score for a line on the logMAR chart represented a change of 0.1 log units. The formula for calculating the logMAR BCVA score was: 1.7 - 0.02*number of letters read. A lower BCVA score indicates better vision. A negative change score indicates improvement.
Baseline and Month 36

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants Losing Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 15 Best Corrected Visual Acuity Letters: Treated Eye
Time Frame: Months 1, 2 , 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 30 and 36
BCVA was assessed as letters read using early treatment diabetic retinopathy study charts and reported as the number of letters read correctly (ranging from 0 to 100 letters) in the study eye (Treated eye). The lower the number of letters read correctly on the eye chart, the worse the vision (or visual acuity). A positive change from baseline indicates an improvement and a negative change from baseline indicates a worsening. The percentage of participants losing >=15 BCVA in the study eye were reported.
Months 1, 2 , 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 30 and 36
Percentage of Participants Losing >=15 Best Corrected Visual Acuity Letters: Fellow Eye
Time Frame: Months 1, 2 , 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 30 and 36
BCVA was assessed as letters read using early treatment diabetic retinopathy study charts and reported as the number of letters read correctly (ranging from 0 to 100 letters) in the fellow eye. The lower the number of letters read correctly on the eye chart, the worse the vision (or visual acuity). A positive change from baseline indicates an improvement and a negative change from baseline indicates a worsening. The percentage of participants losing >=15 BCVA in the fellow eye were reported.
Months 1, 2 , 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 30 and 36
Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity Letters at Months 6 and 12: Treated Eye
Time Frame: Baseline, Months 6 and 12
BCVA was assessed as letters read using early treatment diabetic retinopathy study charts and reported as the number of letters read correctly (ranging from 0 to 100 letters) in the study eye (Treated eye). The lower the number of letters read correctly on the eye chart, the worse the vision (or visual acuity). A positive change from baseline indicates an improvement and a negative change from baseline indicates a worsening.
Baseline, Months 6 and 12
Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity at Months 6 and 12: Fellow Eye
Time Frame: Baseline, Months 6 and 12
BCVA was assessed as letters read using early treatment diabetic retinopathy study charts and reported as the number of letters read correctly (ranging from 0 to 100 letters) in the fellow eye. The lower the number of letters read correctly on the eye chart, the worse the vision (or visual acuity). A positive change from baseline indicates an improvement and a negative change from baseline indicates a worsening.
Baseline, Months 6 and 12
Change From Baseline in Growth Rate of Geographic Atrophy (GA) Lesion Area at Months 6 and 12: Treated Eye
Time Frame: Baseline, Months 6 and 12
The area of GA was determined based primarily on fundus autofluorescence (FAF). The change in GA lesion area was measured by FAF and analysis of FAF images was performed by the central reading center. A positive change from baseline indicates an increase in size of GA lesion area (worsening; disease progression).
Baseline, Months 6 and 12
Change From Baseline in Growth Rate of Geographic Atrophy Lesion Area at Months 6 and 12: Fellow Eye
Time Frame: Baseline, Months 6 and 12
The area of GA was determined based primarily on FAF. The change in GA lesion area was measured by FAF and analysis of FAF images was performed by the central reading center. A positive change from baseline indicates an increase in size of GA lesion area (worsening; disease progression).
Baseline, Months 6 and 12
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Time Frame: Up to Months 36
Number of participants with TEAEs and SAEs were assessed. An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant administered a medicinal (investigational or non investigational) product. An AE does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment and can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not related to that medicinal product. SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose results in death, Is life-threatening, Requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, Results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, Is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, Is a suspected transmission of any infectious agent via a medicinal product.
Up to Months 36
Number of Participants With Ocular Treatment-emergent Adverse Events
Time Frame: Up to Months 36
Number of participants with ocular TEAE were assessed. An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant administered a medicinal (investigational or non investigational) product. An AE does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment and can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not related to that medicinal product.
Up to Months 36

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Janssen Research & Development, LLC

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: Janssen Research & Development, LLC Clinical Trial, Janssen Research & Development, LLC

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
December 4, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 5, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 5, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
December 7, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 14, 2016

First Posted (Estimated)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
January 20, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 29, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 25, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • CR106814
  • CNTO2476MDG2002 (Other Identifier: Janssen Research & Development, LLC)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings