Bone Microarchitecture in the Transplant Patient (TRANSOS)

August 20, 2025 updated by: Hospices Civils de Lyon

Longitudinal Monitoring of Bone Microarchitecture by High Resolution Peripheral Quantitative Computed Tomography of (HR-pQCT) in the Transplant Patient

The optimal management of calcium and phosphate metabolism regulation in chronic kidney disease (CKD) is important in preventing fracture risk and vascular calcification and thus morbidity and mortality, global and vascular.

Kidney transplant in a CKD context, usually with a pre-existing underlying renal osteodystrophy, malnutrition, chronic inflammation, hypogonadism and immunosuppression protocols still often made up of high-dose corticosteroid therapy, are all theoretical factors of post-transplantation bone disease. For other solid organ transplants, even though there is generally no underlying renal osteodystrophy before the transplant, the proportion of osteoporotic patients at the time of transplant is substantial. The bone risk in the immediate post-transplant period is notable.

Patients' follow-up is based on biological, radiological and histological tools. Bone densitometry (DXA) is used to measure bone mass. However, recent international recommendations do not consider DXA as a valid tool to assess bone health in CKD patients. Moreover, it is less informative than peripheral quantitative tomography resolution (HR-pQCT). This latest technique, available in Lyon and Saint-Etienne, is more precise, allowing a three-dimensional study of the trabecular microarchitecture and compartmental volumetric bone density (total, cortical, trabecular), while similar to DXA in terms of radiation (less than 5 μSv). The prevention of cardiovascular risk factors is also part of the daily care of patients with a regular cardiac monitoring (heart ultrasound) and vascular (blood pressure, Doppler of the supra-aortic trunks).

TRANSOS study aims to evaluate in a prospective cohort (longitudinal follow-up of 6 months), the bone status in patients receiving solid organ transplantation in the University Hospitals of Lyon and Saint-Etienne, using DXA and HR-pQCT (at baseline and month 6), in combination with classical biological and cardiovascular monitoring. Transplantation is an important activity in these two hospitals and this protocol provides the same bone follow-up for all solid organ transplants, with a reliable, efficient, non-invasive and low-dose radiation tool.

The primary objective of TRANSOS study is to evaluate changes in tibial cortical density between the baseline and the 6th month post-transplant measured by HR-pQCT.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
137

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • France
      • Bron, France
        • Hôpital Femme Mère Enfant
      • Lyon, France
        • Hôpital Edouard Herriot
      • Saint-Étienne, France
        • CHU Saint Etienne

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

10 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient over 10 year-old
  • Patient receiving a first solid organ transplant within involved hospitals (Lyon, Saint Etienne): kidney, heart, kidney-pancreas, lung
  • Informed consent signed by the patients or their parents (minors)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • No health cover
  • Ongoing pregnancy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Tibial cortical density evaluation
Procedure: Tibial cortical density evaluation
Bone evaluation in transplant patients will be performed by HR-pQCT at baseline (either within 6 months before surgery or within 15 days following surgery) and 6 months post-intervention in order to assess its evolution.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Tibial cortical density measured by HR-pQCT
Time Frame: at 6 months
at 6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
trabecular bone area measured by HR-pQCT
Time Frame: at 6 months
at 6 months
total bone area measured by HR-pQCT
Time Frame: at 6 months
at 6 months
trabecular number measured by HR-pQCT
Time Frame: at 6 months
at 6 months
trabecular thickness measured by HR-pQCT
Time Frame: at 6 months
at 6 months
trabecular separation measured by HR-pQCT
Time Frame: at 6 months
at 6 months
cortical perimeter measured by HR-pQCT
Time Frame: at 6 months
at 6 months
Evaluation of bone markers by measuring calcium
Time Frame: at 6 months
at 6 months
Evaluation of bone markers by measuring phosphate
Time Frame: at 6 months
at 6 months
Evaluation of bone markers by measuring alkaline reserve
Time Frame: at 6 months
at 6 months
Evaluation of bone markers by measuring PTH
Time Frame: at 6 months
at 6 months
Evaluation of bone markers by measuring 25OHD3
Time Frame: at 6 months
at 6 months
Evaluation of bone markers by measuring 1-25 OHD3
Time Frame: at 6 months
at 6 months
Evaluation of bone markers by measuring FGF23
Time Frame: at 6 months
at 6 months
Evaluation of bone markers by measuring CTX
Time Frame: at 6 months
at 6 months
Evaluation of bone markers by measuring total alkaline phosphatase
Time Frame: at 6 months
at 6 months
Evaluation of bone markers by measuring bone alkaline phosphatase
Time Frame: at 6 months
at 6 months
Evaluation of bone markers by measuring osteocalcin
Time Frame: at 6 months
at 6 months
Bone mineral density assessed by DXA
Time Frame: at 6 months
at 6 months
Fractures onset assessed by DXA
Time Frame: at 6 months
at 6 months
Cardiovascular events (death from cardiovascular cause, heart attack, stroke)
Time Frame: at 6 months
at 6 months
PTH
Time Frame: Baseline
For kidney transplant only
Baseline
1-25 OHD
Time Frame: Baseline
For kidney transplant only
Baseline
FGF 23
Time Frame: Baseline
For kidney transplant only
Baseline
calcium
Time Frame: Baseline
For kidney transplant only
Baseline
phosphate
Time Frame: Baseline
For kidney transplant only
Baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Hospices Civils de Lyon

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Charlene LEVI, Doctor, Hospices Civils de Lyon

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 7, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
October 8, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
October 8, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 25, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 31, 2016

First Posted (Estimated)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 6, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 22, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 20, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
November 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 69HCL14_0223
  • 2015-A00510-49 (Other Identifier: IDRCB)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Organ Transplant

Clinical Trials on Tibial cortical density evaluation

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings