Imaging NSCLC Treatment Response to Immunotherapy

January 29, 2021 updated by: Nandita deSouza, Institute of Cancer Research, United Kingdom

Imaging NSCLC Treatment Response to Immunotherapy: Relating Inflammatory Activity on 18FDG PET to Tumour Specific Measures From DW-MRI

This feasibility study will aim to assess the potential for functional imaging biomarkers (18FDG PET-CT and DW-MRI) to differentiate immunotherapy induced inflammation, indicative of response from non-response in patients with stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

30 patients, recruited from within the PEAR Study (Phase 1 dose escalation of palliative radiotherapy with anti-PD1 antibody pembrolizumab in thoracic tumours) will be scanned both before and after receiving immunotherapy for NSCLC. Immunotherapy induced changes in tumour ADC on DW-MRI (a surrogate of apoptotic tumour cell death) will be compared with changes in near contemporaneous, anatomically co-registered 18FDG PET-CT SUV (a non-specific marker for GLUT expression and hence metabolic activity in both tumour and tumour infiltrating lymphocytes). For treatment response, an increase in ADC (reflecting apoptosis within the tumour) is expected, while 18FDG uptake is expected to decrease compared with baseline tumour uptake. In the presence of significant inflammatory cell recruitment, the investigators hypothesise a similar increase in ADC on DW-MRI but without associated reduction in 18FDG PET-CT SUV. Thus the relationship between the ADC change on DW-MRI and the 18FDG change should distinguish between response and non-response in the presence of inflammation.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
10

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United Kingdom
    • Surrey
      • Sutton, Surrey, United Kingdom, SM2 5PT
        • The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

The study population includes patients with NSCLC requiring palliative radiotherapy to the chest and for which no curative therapy exists.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Recruited to PEAR: Phase 1 dose escalation of palliative radiotherapy with anti-PD1 antibody pembrolizumab in thoracic tumours Study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • MRI incompatible metal implants
  • Claustrophobia

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in DW-MRI derived ADC
Time Frame: Duration of Study - 2 year
Describing changes in DW-MRI derived ADC will provide data that may be used to differentiate immune mediated response from non-response in a future study of treatment responses following immunotherapy.
Duration of Study - 2 year
Changes in FDG PET/CT SUV
Time Frame: Duration of Study - 2 year
Describing changes in 18FDG-PET SUV will provide data that may be used to differentiate immune mediated response from non-response in a future study of treatment responses following immunotherapy.
Duration of Study - 2 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Assess for differences in tumour volume using DW-MRI
Time Frame: Duration of Study - 2 year
Assess for differences in tumor volume evaluated using DW-MRI. This will be used as a comparison against other modalities for assessing differences in tumour volume e.g. 18FDG PET-CT. CT is the current standard for radiotherapy target volumes in the chest and with the greater soft tissue delineation facilitated by MRI, comparison of the modalities is warranted.
Duration of Study - 2 year
Assess for differences in tumour volume using 18FDG PET-CT
Time Frame: Duration of Study - 2 year
Assess for differences in tumor volume evaluated using 18FDG PET-CT. This will be used as a comparison against other modalities for assessing differences in tumour volume e.g. MRI. CT is the current standard for radiotherapy target volumes in the chest and with the greater soft tissue delineation facilitated by MRI, comparison of the modalities is warranted.
Duration of Study - 2 year
Assess correlation between DW-MRI derived ADC and FDG PET/CT SUV
Time Frame: Duration of Study - 2 year
Assess the correlation between 18FDG PET Standardised Uptake Values and DW-MRI derived ADC values. Correlations between ADCmax and SUVmax; ADCmean and SUVmean; plus total lesion ADC and total lesion glycolysis will be explored. Recent reports of imaging biomarkers for defining radiotherapy 'dose painting' schedules have focussed on PET imaging and correlation of these parameters with DW-MRI is not yet established.
Duration of Study - 2 year
Ability to predict progression free time and overall survival using DW-MRI ADC
Time Frame: Duration of Study - 2 year
Assess DW-MRI ADC, used alone or in combination with 18FDG SUV (before and after immunotherapy), for its ability to predict progression free and overall survivals following subsequent radiotherapy.
Duration of Study - 2 year
Ability to predict progression free time and overall survival using 18FDG SUV
Time Frame: Duration of Study - 2 year
Assess 18FDG SUV, used alone or in combination with DW-MRI ADC (before and after immunotherapy), for their ability to predict progression free and overall survivals following subsequent radiotherapy.
Duration of Study - 2 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Institute of Cancer Research, United Kingdom

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust
National Institute for Health Research, United Kingdom

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
May 31, 2016

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
May 14, 2020

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
May 14, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 20, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 25, 2016

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 28, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
February 1, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 29, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
January 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • CCR4364

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings