- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02753569
Imaging NSCLC Treatment Response to Immunotherapy
January 29, 2021 updated by: Nandita deSouza, Institute of Cancer Research, United Kingdom
Imaging NSCLC Treatment Response to Immunotherapy: Relating Inflammatory Activity on 18FDG PET to Tumour Specific Measures From DW-MRI
This feasibility study will aim to assess the potential for functional imaging biomarkers (18FDG PET-CT and DW-MRI) to differentiate immunotherapy induced inflammation, indicative of response from non-response in patients with stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
30 patients, recruited from within the PEAR Study (Phase 1 dose escalation of palliative radiotherapy with anti-PD1 antibody pembrolizumab in thoracic tumours) will be scanned both before and after receiving immunotherapy for NSCLC.
Immunotherapy induced changes in tumour ADC on DW-MRI (a surrogate of apoptotic tumour cell death) will be compared with changes in near contemporaneous, anatomically co-registered 18FDG PET-CT SUV (a non-specific marker for GLUT expression and hence metabolic activity in both tumour and tumour infiltrating lymphocytes).
For treatment response, an increase in ADC (reflecting apoptosis within the tumour) is expected, while 18FDG uptake is expected to decrease compared with baseline tumour uptake.
In the presence of significant inflammatory cell recruitment, the investigators hypothesise a similar increase in ADC on DW-MRI but without associated reduction in 18FDG PET-CT SUV.
Thus the relationship between the ADC change on DW-MRI and the 18FDG change should distinguish between response and non-response in the presence of inflammation.
Study Type
Observational
Enrollment (Actual)
10
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Surrey
-
Sutton, Surrey, United Kingdom, SM2 5PT
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Sampling Method
Probability Sample
Study Population
The study population includes patients with NSCLC requiring palliative radiotherapy to the chest and for which no curative therapy exists.
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Recruited to PEAR: Phase 1 dose escalation of palliative radiotherapy with anti-PD1 antibody pembrolizumab in thoracic tumours Study
Exclusion Criteria:
- MRI incompatible metal implants
- Claustrophobia
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Changes in DW-MRI derived ADC
Time Frame: Duration of Study - 2 year
|
Describing changes in DW-MRI derived ADC will provide data that may be used to differentiate immune mediated response from non-response in a future study of treatment responses following immunotherapy.
|
Duration of Study - 2 year
|
|
Changes in FDG PET/CT SUV
Time Frame: Duration of Study - 2 year
|
Describing changes in 18FDG-PET SUV will provide data that may be used to differentiate immune mediated response from non-response in a future study of treatment responses following immunotherapy.
|
Duration of Study - 2 year
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Assess for differences in tumour volume using DW-MRI
Time Frame: Duration of Study - 2 year
|
Assess for differences in tumor volume evaluated using DW-MRI.
This will be used as a comparison against other modalities for assessing differences in tumour volume e.g.
18FDG PET-CT.
CT is the current standard for radiotherapy target volumes in the chest and with the greater soft tissue delineation facilitated by MRI, comparison of the modalities is warranted.
|
Duration of Study - 2 year
|
|
Assess for differences in tumour volume using 18FDG PET-CT
Time Frame: Duration of Study - 2 year
|
Assess for differences in tumor volume evaluated using 18FDG PET-CT.
This will be used as a comparison against other modalities for assessing differences in tumour volume e.g.
MRI.
CT is the current standard for radiotherapy target volumes in the chest and with the greater soft tissue delineation facilitated by MRI, comparison of the modalities is warranted.
|
Duration of Study - 2 year
|
|
Assess correlation between DW-MRI derived ADC and FDG PET/CT SUV
Time Frame: Duration of Study - 2 year
|
Assess the correlation between 18FDG PET Standardised Uptake Values and DW-MRI derived ADC values.
Correlations between ADCmax and SUVmax; ADCmean and SUVmean; plus total lesion ADC and total lesion glycolysis will be explored.
Recent reports of imaging biomarkers for defining radiotherapy 'dose painting' schedules have focussed on PET imaging and correlation of these parameters with DW-MRI is not yet established.
|
Duration of Study - 2 year
|
|
Ability to predict progression free time and overall survival using DW-MRI ADC
Time Frame: Duration of Study - 2 year
|
Assess DW-MRI ADC, used alone or in combination with 18FDG SUV (before and after immunotherapy), for its ability to predict progression free and overall survivals following subsequent radiotherapy.
|
Duration of Study - 2 year
|
|
Ability to predict progression free time and overall survival using 18FDG SUV
Time Frame: Duration of Study - 2 year
|
Assess 18FDG SUV, used alone or in combination with DW-MRI ADC (before and after immunotherapy), for their ability to predict progression free and overall survivals following subsequent radiotherapy.
|
Duration of Study - 2 year
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ACTUAL)
May 31, 2016
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
May 14, 2020
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
May 14, 2020
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
April 20, 2016
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
April 25, 2016
First Posted (ESTIMATE)
April 28, 2016
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
February 1, 2021
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
January 29, 2021
Last Verified
January 1, 2021
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- CCR4364
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.