Imaging NSCLC Treatment Response to Immunotherapy

January 29, 2021 updated by: Nandita deSouza, Institute of Cancer Research, United Kingdom

Imaging NSCLC Treatment Response to Immunotherapy: Relating Inflammatory Activity on 18FDG PET to Tumour Specific Measures From DW-MRI

This feasibility study will aim to assess the potential for functional imaging biomarkers (18FDG PET-CT and DW-MRI) to differentiate immunotherapy induced inflammation, indicative of response from non-response in patients with stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

30 patients, recruited from within the PEAR Study (Phase 1 dose escalation of palliative radiotherapy with anti-PD1 antibody pembrolizumab in thoracic tumours) will be scanned both before and after receiving immunotherapy for NSCLC. Immunotherapy induced changes in tumour ADC on DW-MRI (a surrogate of apoptotic tumour cell death) will be compared with changes in near contemporaneous, anatomically co-registered 18FDG PET-CT SUV (a non-specific marker for GLUT expression and hence metabolic activity in both tumour and tumour infiltrating lymphocytes). For treatment response, an increase in ADC (reflecting apoptosis within the tumour) is expected, while 18FDG uptake is expected to decrease compared with baseline tumour uptake. In the presence of significant inflammatory cell recruitment, the investigators hypothesise a similar increase in ADC on DW-MRI but without associated reduction in 18FDG PET-CT SUV. Thus the relationship between the ADC change on DW-MRI and the 18FDG change should distinguish between response and non-response in the presence of inflammation.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

10

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Surrey
      • Sutton, Surrey, United Kingdom, SM2 5PT
        • The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

The study population includes patients with NSCLC requiring palliative radiotherapy to the chest and for which no curative therapy exists.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Recruited to PEAR: Phase 1 dose escalation of palliative radiotherapy with anti-PD1 antibody pembrolizumab in thoracic tumours Study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • MRI incompatible metal implants
  • Claustrophobia

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in DW-MRI derived ADC
Time Frame: Duration of Study - 2 year
Describing changes in DW-MRI derived ADC will provide data that may be used to differentiate immune mediated response from non-response in a future study of treatment responses following immunotherapy.
Duration of Study - 2 year
Changes in FDG PET/CT SUV
Time Frame: Duration of Study - 2 year
Describing changes in 18FDG-PET SUV will provide data that may be used to differentiate immune mediated response from non-response in a future study of treatment responses following immunotherapy.
Duration of Study - 2 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Assess for differences in tumour volume using DW-MRI
Time Frame: Duration of Study - 2 year
Assess for differences in tumor volume evaluated using DW-MRI. This will be used as a comparison against other modalities for assessing differences in tumour volume e.g. 18FDG PET-CT. CT is the current standard for radiotherapy target volumes in the chest and with the greater soft tissue delineation facilitated by MRI, comparison of the modalities is warranted.
Duration of Study - 2 year
Assess for differences in tumour volume using 18FDG PET-CT
Time Frame: Duration of Study - 2 year
Assess for differences in tumor volume evaluated using 18FDG PET-CT. This will be used as a comparison against other modalities for assessing differences in tumour volume e.g. MRI. CT is the current standard for radiotherapy target volumes in the chest and with the greater soft tissue delineation facilitated by MRI, comparison of the modalities is warranted.
Duration of Study - 2 year
Assess correlation between DW-MRI derived ADC and FDG PET/CT SUV
Time Frame: Duration of Study - 2 year
Assess the correlation between 18FDG PET Standardised Uptake Values and DW-MRI derived ADC values. Correlations between ADCmax and SUVmax; ADCmean and SUVmean; plus total lesion ADC and total lesion glycolysis will be explored. Recent reports of imaging biomarkers for defining radiotherapy 'dose painting' schedules have focussed on PET imaging and correlation of these parameters with DW-MRI is not yet established.
Duration of Study - 2 year
Ability to predict progression free time and overall survival using DW-MRI ADC
Time Frame: Duration of Study - 2 year
Assess DW-MRI ADC, used alone or in combination with 18FDG SUV (before and after immunotherapy), for its ability to predict progression free and overall survivals following subsequent radiotherapy.
Duration of Study - 2 year
Ability to predict progression free time and overall survival using 18FDG SUV
Time Frame: Duration of Study - 2 year
Assess 18FDG SUV, used alone or in combination with DW-MRI ADC (before and after immunotherapy), for their ability to predict progression free and overall survivals following subsequent radiotherapy.
Duration of Study - 2 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

May 31, 2016

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

May 14, 2020

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

May 14, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 20, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 25, 2016

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

April 28, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

February 1, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 29, 2021

Last Verified

January 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CCR4364

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cancer

Clinical Trials on FDG PET-CT

Subscribe