A Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Epoetin Beta (NeoRecormon®) in Anemic Participants With Breast Cancer Undergoing Chemotherapy

August 23, 2018 updated by: Hoffmann-La Roche

Multicenter Study for the Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety of NeoRecormon® Therapy Administered as 30000 IU Subcutaneously in Anemic Patients With Breast Cancer Treated With Chemotherapy

This study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of subcutaneous (SC) epoetin beta in anemic participants with breast cancer undergoing chemotherapy.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
200

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Italy
      • Arezzo, Italy, 52100
      • Ascoli Piceno, Italy, 63100
      • Bussolengo VR, Italy, 37012
      • Busto Arsizio, Italy, 21052
      • Casale Monferrato, Italy, 15033
      • Catania, Italy, 95100
      • Catanzaro, Italy, 88100
      • Chieti, Italy, 66100
      • Cuneo, Italy, 12100
      • Fano, Italy, 61032
      • Firenze, Italy, 50139
      • Frosinone, Italy, 03100
      • Genova, Italy, 16132
      • Macerata, Italy, 62100
      • Messina, Italy, 98123
      • Monza, Italy, 20052
      • Napoli, Italy, 80131
      • Nocera Inferiore, Italy, 84014
      • Pavia, Italy, 27100
      • Pisa, Italy, 56100
      • Pordenone, Italy, 33170
      • Roma, Italy, 00149
      • Roma, Italy, 00168
      • Sassari, Italy, 07100
      • Torino, Italy, 10126
      • Vecchiazzano, Italy, 47100
      • Vittorio Veneto, Italy, 31029

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult female participants with histological diagnosis of breast cancer
  • Any type of chemotherapy planned for greater than or equal to (>/=) 9 weeks
  • Hemoglobin level less than (<) 11 grams per deciliter (g/dL)
  • Participants able to receive iron supplement, if necessary

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known or suspected contraindications to epoetin beta
  • Pregnancy or lactation period
  • Diagnosis of anemia only due to iron-deficiency
  • Diagnosis of thalasemic syndromes
  • Epilepsy and/or cerebral metastasis
  • Blood transfusion or treatment with any erythropoietic factor within 4 weeks before study start

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Epoetin Beta
Anemic breast cancer participants will receive epoetin beta treatment for 12 weeks.
Drug: Epoetin Beta
All participants will receive epoetin beta at a dose of 30000 International Units (IU) as SC injection once every week for a total of 12 weeks. Adjustments in the dose will be implemented based on the participant's blood hemoglobin levels.
Other Names:
  • NeoRecormon

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants With Response to Treatment Based on Hemoglobin Levels
Time Frame: Week 12
Response was defined as increase of hemoglobin levels by at least 2 grams per deciliter (g/dL) as compared to baseline or the achievement of hemoglobin level of 12 g/dL after 12 weeks of treatment in the absence of red blood cells transfusion.
Week 12

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin Levels After 12 Weeks of Study Treatment in Participants According to the Hemoglobin Level at Baseline
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12
Participants were distributed into 2 subgroups. One subgroup contained participants who had hemoglobin (Hb) level less than (<) 10 g/dL and other subgroup contained participants who had hemoglobin level greater than or equal to (≥) 10 g/dL but <11 g/dL (10≤ Hb <11 g/dL).
Baseline, Week 12
Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin Levels After 12 Weeks of Study Treatment in Participants According to Chemotherapy at Baseline
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12
Participants were distributed into 3 subgroups. First subgroup contained participants who received adjuvant chemotherapy. Second subgroup contained participants who received metastatic 1st or 2nd line chemotherapy. Third subgroup contained participants who received metastatic 3rd line chemotherapy.
Baseline, Week 12
Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin Levels After 12 Weeks of Study Treatment in Participants According to the Time Spent on Chemotherapy at Baseline
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12
Participants were distributed into 2 subgroups. One subgroup contained participants who had spent <6 months on chemotherapy and other subgroup contained participants who had spent 6 months or more on chemotherapy.
Baseline, Week 12
Overall Mean Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin Levels After 12 Weeks of Study Treatment
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12
Baseline, Week 12
Percentage of Participants With an Increase From Baseline in Hemoglobin Levels of At Least 1 g/dL After 4 Weeks
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 4
Baseline, Week 4
Mean Time Needed to Increase Hemoglobin Level by At Least 1 g/dL
Time Frame: Baseline up to Week 12
Time to increase in hemoglobin level by at least 1 g/dL was defined as the time between the start of treatment and an increase in hemoglobin level by at least 1 g/dL compared to baseline hemoglobin level. Time to response was estimated using Kaplan Meier method.
Baseline up to Week 12
Quality of Life Assessment Using Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Anemia (FACT-An) Questionnaire Scores
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12
FACT-An comprised of 2 subscales ('Fatigue' and 'Non-fatigue') of 20-items. All questions were rated on a scale from 0 to 4, where higher scores indicate improved quality of life. The 'Fatigue' subscale consists of 13 questions with score range from 0-52; 'Non-fatigue' subscale consists of 7 questions with score range from 0-28. Total FACT-An score was transformed to a 0-100 scale (instead of 0-80 scale) to get better perception of the participant's quality of life indicator.
Baseline, Week 12

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Hoffmann-La Roche

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
February 29, 2004

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
March 31, 2007

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
March 31, 2007

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 3, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 3, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
May 4, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 24, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 23, 2018

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • ML17503

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings