Italian Study Of Validation Of Angiogenesis Polymorphisms In HCC Patients Treated With Sorafenib (INNOVATE)

February 25, 2021 updated by: Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la cura dei Tumori

Italian Multicentric Prospective Study Of Validation Of Angiogenesis Polymorphisms In HCC Patients Treated With Sorafenib

Sorafenib represents the standard care for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, molecular predictors of sorafenib efficacy have not yet been identified.

The primary aim of the study is to validate the prognostic or predictive role of eNOS,Ang2, HIF-1, VEGF and VEGFR polymorphisms in relation to clinical outcome (progression-free survival, PFS) of HCC patients treated with sorafenib.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Active, not recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Sorafenib is a multikinase inhibitor acting on vascular endothelial growth factor receptors (VEGFR) and platelet-derived growth factor receptor beta (PDGFRβ) involved in tumor cell proliferation and tumor angiogenesis.

Angiogenesis is a cascade of linked and sequential steps ultimately leading to tumour neovascularisation. Preclinical data suggested that significant HCC growth is dependent on angiogenesis, and an increase in tumour dimension may induce vascular endothelial cell proliferation.

Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-driven pathway has been demonstrated to play a major role in tumour angiogenesis. In fact, VEGF as a potent permeability factor promotes cell migration during invasion and as an endothelial growth factor stimulates endothelial cell proliferation, inducing the budding of new blood vessels around the growing tumour masses .

Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in VEGF and VEGF receptor (VEGFR) genes have also been correlated to tumour neoangiogenesis through different biological mechanisms.

In the ALICE-1 study HCC patients receiving sorafenib were tested for VEGF-A, VEGF-C and VEGFR-1,2,3 SNPs. At univariate analysis VEGF-A alleles C of rs25648, T of rs833061, C of rs699947, C of rs2010963, VEGF-C alleles T of rs4604006, G of rs664393, VEGFR-2 alleles C of rs2071559, C of rs2305948 were significant predictors of PFS and overall survival (OS). At multivariate analysis rs2010963, rs4604006 and Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage resulted to be independent factors influencing PFS and OS.

In the ALICE-2 study SNPs of hypoxia inducible factor 1α (HIF-1α) were statistically significant for PFS and OS. The extended analysis of VEGF and VEGFR SNPs confirms the results of ALICE-1 study. The presence of GG genotype of rs12434438 (HIF-1α) select a population with a particularly poor outcome independently from the clinical effect of the two VEGF SNPs (PFS: 2.6 months, p<0,0001; OS: 6.6 months, p<0,0001).

In ePHAS study a training cohort of 41 HCC patients and a validation cohort of 87 patients receiving sorafenib was analyzed. At univariate analysis, patients homozygous for an endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) haplotype (HT1: T-4b at eNOS-786/eNOS VNTR) had a lower median PFS (2.6 vs. 5.8 months, p <0.0001) and OS (3.2 vs.14.6 months, p = 0.024) than those with other haplotypes. These data were confirmed in the validation set in which patients homozygous for HT1 had a lower median PFS (2.0 vs. 6.7 months, p <0.0001) and OS (6.4 vs.18.0 months, p < 0.0001).

On the basis of these premises this prospective study aims at validating the potential role of eNOS, VEGF, VEGFR, HIF-1 and Ang2 polymorphisms in patients with HCC treated with sorafenib.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
160

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Italy
      • Roma, Italy, 00128
        • Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico
    • BA
      • Bari, BA, Italy, 70124
        • Irccs Istituto Tumori Giovanni Paolo Ii
    • CA
      • Cagliari, CA, Italy, 09124
        • AOU di Cagliari - PO San Giovanni di Dio
    • FC
      • Meldola, FC, Italy, 47014
        • Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori
    • PD
      • Padova, PD, Italy, 35128
        • Istituto Oncologico Veneto
    • PI
      • Pisa, PI, Italy, 56126
        • Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Pisana
    • PR
      • Parma, PR, Italy, 43126
        • Oncologia medica - AOU di Parma
    • RA
      • Faenza, RA, Italy, 48018
        • Oncologia medica , PO FAENZA, Ausl della Romagna
    • RM
      • Rimini, RM, Italy, 47921
        • Ospedale Civile degli Infermi
    • UD
      • Udine, UD, Italy, 33100
        • Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Integrata di Udine S. Maria della Misericordia

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

The study population consists of patients with advanced-stage hepatocellular carcinoma, according to the criteria American Association for the Study of Liver Disease (AASLD) / European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL)

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Signed and dated informed consent.
  2. Ability to understand and the willingness to sign a written informed consent document.
  3. Male or Female, aged >18 years.
  4. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status score of 2 or less.
  5. Life expectancy of 12 weeks or more.
  6. Adequate hematologic function.
  7. Patients were required to have at least one untreated target lesion that could be measured in one dimension, according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST version 1.1).
  8. Concomitant antiviral systemic therapy was allowed.
  9. Resolution of all acute toxic effects of any prior local treatment.
  10. HCC diagnosed according to the AASLD and/or EASL criteria.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Previous or concurrent cancer that is distinct in primary site or histology from HCC.
  2. Renal failure requiring hemo- or peritoneal dialysis.
  3. Presence of recent (< 6 months) or current cardiac failure Known history of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection.
  4. Known central nervous system tumors including metastatic brain disease.
  5. Patients with clinically significant gastrointestinal bleeding within 30 days prior to study entry.
  6. Any prior local therapy within 4 weeks of study entry.
  7. Pregnancy or breastfeeding.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Advanced HCC patients treated with sorafenib
Procedure: blood sample collection

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
PFS
Time Frame: up to three years
prognostic/predictive role of eNOS,Ang2, HIF-1, VEGF and VEGFR polymorphisms in relation to Progression Free Survival
up to three years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
OS
Time Frame: up to three years
prognostic/predictive role of eNOS,Ang2, HIF-1, VEGF and VEGFR polymorphisms in relation to Overall Survival
up to three years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la cura dei Tumori

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Andrea Casadei-Gardini, MD, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST)

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
February 15, 2016

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 1, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 20, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 25, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 1, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
February 26, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 25, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • IRSTB051

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings