Topical Tripterygium Wilfordii Gel for Moderate Activity Rheumatoid Arthritis

November 19, 2018 updated by: Quan Jiang, Guang'anmen Hospital of China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences

Topical Tripterygium Wilfordii Gel for Treatment in Patients With Moderate Activity Rheumatoid Arthritis

Tripterygium wilfordii Hook F (TwHF), a traditional Chinese herb, is widely used in China for treating Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA), but limited only for elderly RA patients because of its reproductive system toxicity. The investigators are inspired by Chinese external therapy, an immemorial therapy for thousands of years, and take its advantage to make TwHF topically in order to get an effective and safe treatment for active RA patients.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
70

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • China
    • Beijing
      • Beijing, Beijing, China, 100053
        • Guang'anmen Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Documented diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis, as defined by the American Rheumatism Association 1987 Revised Criteria.
  • Documented diagnosis of damp-heat syndrome according to Traditional Chinese Medicine.
  • Patients, men and women, must age from 18 to 65 years old.
  • Patients must have moderately active RA based on the criteria of the DAS-28 score from 3.2 to 5.1.
  • If patients are receiving Disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs), then the doses should have been kept stable for at least 12 weeks.
  • If patients are receiving non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) or orally Chinese herbal medicine, then the doses should have been kept stable for at least 4 weeks.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Skin allergies or broken skin;
  • Taking TwHF agents, glucocorticoids and biological agents;
  • Female patients who are pregnant, breast-feeding or planed to be pregnant;
  • Subjects suffering serious hyperlipidemia, hyperglycemia, diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular diseases, gastrointestinal problems or liver and renal failure.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: DOUBLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
EXPERIMENTAL: topical TwHF gel group
Topical TwHF gel recipe composes Tripterygium wilfordii Hook F, Mangxiao (Mirabilite), Chuanxiong (Rhizoma Ligustici), Ruxiang (Olibanum), Moyao (M yrrh) (prescription proportion is 4:4:2:2:1).Each gel is 20 gram(g). TwHF gel is applied for 1st to 5th metacarpophalangeal joints, 1st to 5th proximal interphalangeal joints, wrists, knees and ankles 20g for 1 hour, once per day from week 0 through week 4 and 10g for 1 hour, once per day from week 5 through week 8.
Drug: Topical tripterygium gel
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: placebo group
Placebo recipe composes viscous agent which matches by the sucrose. The usage and dosage of topical TwHF and placebo are the same.
Drug: Placebo gel

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Twenty percent improvement in the American College of Rheumatology criteria
Time Frame: Week 8.
a patient must have 20% or greater improvement in both tender and swollen joints (28 tender and 28 swollen joints were assessed) and 20% or greater improvement in 3 or more of the following: the physician's or patient's assessment of global health status, the patient's assessment of pain on a visual analogue scale, the patient's assessment of function using a modified version of the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), and the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) or serum C-reactive protein (CRP) level.
Week 8.
Twenty percent improvement in the American College of Rheumatology criteria
Time Frame: Week 4.
Week 4.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Fifty percent improvement in the American College of Rheumatology criteria
Time Frame: Week 4 and week 8.
a patient must have 50% or greater improvement in both tender and swollen joints (28 tender and 28 swollen joints were assessed) and 50% or greater improvement in 3 or more of the following: the physician's or patient's assessment of global health status, the patient's assessment of pain on a visual analogue scale, the patient's assessment of function using a modified version of the HAQ), and the ESR or CRP level.
Week 4 and week 8.
The changes of the 28-joint count Disease Activity Score (DAS28)
Time Frame: Week 4 and week 8.
Week 4 and week 8.
The changes of Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain score
Time Frame: Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8.
Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8.
The change of knee synovitis classification as assessed by musculoskeletal ultrasound (MSUS)
Time Frame: Week 2, 4, and 8.
Synovitis classification is specific as follows: 0 level, no doppler signal; level 1: three independent point or 2 successive or 1 and 2 in independent dot doppler signal; level 2: doppler signal < 50% of the synovial membrane area; level 3 doppler signal is the synovium in > 50% of the area.
Week 2, 4, and 8.
The change of knee synovial hyperplasia classification as assessed by MSUS
Time Frame: Week 2, 4, and 8.
Synovial hyperplasia classification is specific as follows: 0 level, no synovial hyperplasia; level 1: synovial hyperplasia of mild, not more than bone surface high attachment; level 2: synovial hyperplasia more than bone surface high wire, but not more than the backbone; level 3: synovial hyperplasia more than bone surface peak wires, and extends along the backbone of the side.
Week 2, 4, and 8.
The change of knee articular cavity effusion as assessed by MSUS
Time Frame: Week 2, 4, and 8.
Articular cavity effusion adopts binary evaluation, namely: 0: normal, 1: abnormal.
Week 2, 4, and 8.
The change of knee bone erosion classification as assessed by MSUS
Time Frame: Week 2, 4, and 8.
Bone erosion classification adopts binary evaluation, namely: 0: normal, 1: abnormal.
Week 2, 4, and 8.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Guang'anmen Hospital of China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
April 1, 2012

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
March 1, 2013

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 15, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 28, 2016

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 29, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
November 20, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 19, 2018

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
November 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • Z161100001816046

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings