Efficacy of Aspirin and L-arginine in High Risk Preeclamptic

November 25, 2020 updated by: Leonel Garcia Benavides, University of Guadalajara

Efficacy of the Combination of Acetylsalicylic Acid and L-arginine to Prevent Preeclampsia in Pregnant High Risk

Worldwide, the incidence of preeclampsia ranges from 2 to 10% of pregnancies. The World Health Organization (WHO) estimates that the incidence of preeclampsia is seven times higher in developing countries than in developed (2.8% and 0.4%). In Mexico it is estimated that preeclampsia - eclampsia is a major cause of maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality. Because it is an idiopathic heterogeneous syndrome associated with endothelial damage, so far there is no effective treatment to decrease the morbidity and mortality of this entity, so it is necessary to strengthen prevention; the use of aspirin alone is inconclusive, in addition to the information the investigators have reduced the effect of these strategies on arterial stiffness; Moreover, it has been observed that L-arginine lowers blood pressure in this population. It is for this that is of interest to know the efficacy and safety of the combination of L-arginine low dose, which is known as an important eNOS in NO production substrate, and aspirin for its qualities of antiinflammatory and anticoagulant in the prevention of preeclampsia and also determine their effect on arterial stiffness as a noninvasive method, as is the applanation tonometry.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Suspended

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

It will conduct a clinical trial, double-blind, randomized and placebo control group female patients with 12 weeks of gestation have one or more risk factors for developing preeclampsia. 2 groups will be formed with 82 patients each, chance will determine the intervention (acetylsalicylic + L-arginine acetylsalicylic acid or acid + placebo). At the beginning and end of the intervention clinical and laboratory determinations, the end will be determined in both groups the incidence of preeclampsia, severity and number needed to treat is made. The data obtained were analyzed using SPSS statistical software version 22. It was considered statistically significant at p <0.05.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
82

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Mexico
    • Jalisco
      • Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico, 44280
        • Antiguo Hospital Civil Fray Antonio Alcalde

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 44 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant before 12 weeks of gestation
  • High risk of preeclampsia
  • Signature of informed consent in writing

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Noncompliance > 20% of drug intake
  • Lack of tolerability L-arginine or acetylsalicylic acid
  • Compliance with at least one non-inclusion criteria during the course of the study
  • Serious adverse event
  • Withdrawal of consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: acetylsalicylic acid and L-arginine
acetylsalicylic acid 75 mg every 24 hours from the 12th week of pregnancy and L-arginine 3 gr every 8 hours from the 20th week of pregnancy to pregnancy termination
Drug: L-arginine
3 gr per day
Other Names:
  • arginine
Drug: acetylsalicylic acid
3 gr per day
Other Names:
  • aspirin
Placebo Comparator: acetylsalicylic acid and placebo
acetylsalicylic acid 75 mg every 24 hours from the 12th week of pregnancy and placebo 3 gr every 8 hours from the 20th week of pregnancy to pregnancy termination
Drug: acetylsalicylic acid
3 gr per day
Other Names:
  • aspirin
Drug: Placebo (for L-arginine)
3 gr per day
Other Names:
  • Magnesia calcined

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Incidence of preeclampsia
Time Frame: from 20 weeks gestation until 37 weeks
from 20 weeks gestation until 37 weeks
severity of preeclampsia
Time Frame: from 20 weeks gestation until 37 weeks
from 20 weeks gestation until 37 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Pulmonary edema maternal
Time Frame: at week 37
at week 37
Acute myocardial infarction maternal
Time Frame: at week 37
at week 37
Stroke maternal
Time Frame: at week 37
at week 37
Acute respiratory distress syndrome maternal
Time Frame: at week 37
at week 37
Coagulopathy maternal
Time Frame: at week 37
at week 37
Renal failure maternal
Time Frame: at week 37
at week 37
Retinal damage maternal
Time Frame: at week 37
at week 37
maternal mortality
Time Frame: at week 37
at week 37
Birth weight
Time Frame: birth
birth
Intrauterine growth restriction
Time Frame: birth
birth
Fetal mortality
Time Frame: birth
birth
systolic blood pressure maternal
Time Frame: from 12 weeks gestation until 37 weeks
from 12 weeks gestation until 37 weeks
diastolic blood pressure maternal
Time Frame: from 12 weeks gestation until 37 weeks
from 12 weeks gestation until 37 weeks
Mean blood pressure maternal
Time Frame: from 12 weeks gestation until 37 weeks
from 12 weeks gestation until 37 weeks
Pulse wave velocity maternal
Time Frame: from 12 weeks gestation until 37 weeks
from 12 weeks gestation until 37 weeks
Adverse effects maternal
Time Frame: from 12 weeks gestation until 37 weeks
from 12 weeks gestation until 37 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Guadalajara

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
PhD Ernesto Javier Ramírez Lizardo
PhD Sylvia Elena Totsuka Sutto
PhD Fernando Grover Páez
MD Diego Hernández Molina

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Leonel García Benavides, PhD, University Guadalajara

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 1, 2018

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
July 1, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
August 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 26, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 15, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 20, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
November 27, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 25, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
November 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • ECAALA

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings