Intra-Operative Corticosteroid Injection During Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery

May 2, 2021 updated by: Peter Chang

Efficacy of Intra-operative Subacromial Corticosteroid Injections on Surgical Outcomes After Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery

The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy of intra-operative subacromial corticosteroid injections in patients undergoing arthroscopic shoulder surgery on quality of life scores and activity level when compared to a control group.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Terminated

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This study is designed to assess whether a subacromial injection of corticosteroids at the time of arthroscopic shoulder surgery influences quality of life scores and activity level when compared to a control group. The hypothesis is that intra-operative subacromial corticosteroid injection after arthroscopic subacromial decompression surgery will provide a more rapid improvement in quality of life scores and activity levels in the post-operative period compared with controls. The study will be a placebo-controlled, double-blind prospective study. All patients necessitating arthroscopic shoulder surgery presenting to Dr. Keith Baumgarten's clinics are eligible for participation. If the patient meets the inclusion criteria, then informed consent will be obtained for participation in this study. Each patient will undergo a standard shoulder exam to assess active range of motion and complete demographics and pre-operative patient determined outcomes surveys (1. Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) 2. Simple Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) 3. Western Ontario Rotator Cuff (WORC)) and the Marx shoulder activity level survey (MARX). Patients will then undergo arthroscopic shoulder surgery. After arthroscopic surgery the experimental group will undergo a subacromial corticosteroid injection + marcaine while the control group will undergo a subacromial marcaine injection. Outcomes will be assessed using the same quality of life surveys and an activity level survey at post-operative visits at the time intervals: 2 weeks and 3 months and by U.S. mail at 5 months and 1 year. Active range of motion will be assessed at post-operative visits: 2 weeks, 6 weeks, and 3 months. Subjects that meet criteria to undergo arthroscopic shoulder surgery will be provided informed consent to receiving either a subacromial corticosteroid injection or placebo injection at the end of surgery. Patients will be expected to complete all pre- and post-operative quality of life surveys and activity level surveys. It will take less than 20 minutes to complete all listed surveys at each pre- and post-operative visit. Active range of motion will be assessed at each post-operative visit and subjects will be expected to take part in this physical examination as well. The duration of subject participation is 1 year from the date of initial surgery.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
12

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • South Dakota
      • Sioux Falls, South Dakota, United States, 57105
        • Orthopedic Institute

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients aged 18 years-old or older
  • Male patients
  • Female patients
  • Patients able to speak and understand written English
  • Patients presenting to the orthopedic institute clinic with shoulder pain and necessitating the procedure of arthroscopic shoulder surgery
  • Specific arthroscopic procedures include: intra-articular debridement, decompression, acromioplasty, and acromioclavicular joint resection

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients undergoing arthroscopic shoulder surgery that includes other interventions (i.e. rotator cuff repair; labral repair, etc)
  • Patients with adhesive capsulitis
  • Patients with significant cervical spine symptoms and/or pathology
  • Patients having a history of receiving chronic pain treatment
  • Patients who are currently pregnant or who become pregnant before surgery
  • Patients who cannot speak or understand written english
  • Patients who are under the age of 18 years of age
  • As per exclusionary criteria if a subject is pregnant they will not be eligible for participation.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Placebo Comparator: Group A
After arthroscopic surgery the control group (Group A) will undergo a subacromial marcaine injection (standard of care).
Drug: Marcaine (4ml 0.5%, injection)
Control
Experimental: Group B
After arthroscopic surgery the experimental group (Group B) will undergo a subacromial corticosteroid injection+marcaine.
Drug: Marcaine (4ml 0.5%, injection)
Control
Drug: Methylprednisolone (40 mg depomedrol, 1ml, injection)
Experimental Drug

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Survey (DASH)
Time Frame: 1 year
1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Active Range of Motion of Shoulder
Time Frame: Pre-operatively and Post-operatively at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, and 3 months
Change from baseline active range of motion will be assessed. Range of motion of the shoulder joint will be examined by having the patient actively flex, extend, abduct, adduct, internally rotate, and externally rotate the shoulder
Pre-operatively and Post-operatively at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, and 3 months
Simple Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE)
Time Frame: 1 year
1 year
Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Survey (WORC)
Time Frame: 1 year
1 year
Marx Shoulder Activity Level Survey (MARX)
Time Frame: 1 year
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Peter Chang

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
March 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
April 1, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
April 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
July 20, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 13, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 16, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 6, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 2, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2016.128

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings