Slowing Down Disease Progression in Premanifest SCA: a Piloting Interventional Exergame Trial (SlowSCA)

August 11, 2016 updated by: University Hospital Tuebingen
This is a piloting study using continuous motor training provided via whole body-controlled video games (exergames) to establish proof-of-concept evidence that such training leads to motor and neural changes in pre-manifest subjects with spinocerebellar ataxias (SCA).

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

In many neurodegenerative diseases, including spinocerebellar ataxias (SCA), large populations of neurons are already lost and compensatory resources exhausted at time of clinical diagnosis. This calls for early intervention strategies aiming to slow down disease progression already at the premanifest stage of the disease. Here we propose the world-first interventional study aiming to delay onset in a rare genetic neurodegenerative disease. Specifically, we propose a piloting study using continuous motor training provided via whole body-controlled video games (exergames) to establish proof-of-concept evidence that such training leads to motor and neural changes in pre-manifest SCA subjects. The subclinical effects will be unravelled within an intraindividual control study design by elaborated quantitative Video Management System (VICON®)-based movement analysis and structural and functional 3 Tesla (T) magnetic resonance imaging. This will provide unique insights in underlying motor and neural networks and compensatory strategies. If successful, this piloting trial will provide the basis for a rigorous international multi-center large-scale study in a larger SCA population. Moreover, it will stimulate complementary tandem projects on effects of motor training on neural functioning and molecular pathways in premanifest SCA mouse models.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
26

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • adult persons (age 18-80 years) who (i) are a blood-related relative of an index subject with a known SCA 1,2,3 or 6 mutation and who (ii) have a score value of <8 points on the Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA)
  • full capacity to consent to study participation after extensive information (fully Informed Consent)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Cognitive deficits which prevent full comprehension of the study requirements and/or training requirements
  • Comorbid diseases that place severe constraints on a continous training with whole-body controlled exergames (e.g. severe visual or hearing deficits; severe paresis; severe movement disorders other than ataxia)
  • Comorbid neurologic disease other than ataxia (e.g. prior stroke or brain trauma)
  • Pregnant or breast-feeding persons
  • Lack of capacity for full informed consent according to established psychiatric criteria for full informed consent

Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) exclusion criteria:

  • cardiac pacemakers
  • artificial heart valves
  • metal prostheses
  • implanted magnetic metal parts (screws, plates and similar devices)
  • intrauterine devices (for instance, for contraceptive purposes)
  • shrapnel parts and other metal pieces
  • non-removable braces and metal dentures
  • non-removable acupuncture needles
  • insulin pumps and infusion ports
  • tattoos, eye shadow and other metal-containing make-up
  • The subject has decreased sensitivity to temperature and / or decreased tolerance towards elevated body temperatures or warming of body parts.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Other: Motor training
The motor training comprise of demanding coordinative exercises based on commercially available developed by Microsoft Game Console (XBOX Kinect™) exergames that specifically target ataxia dysfunctions.
Other: Motor training
The motor training will comprise of demanding coordinative exercises based on commercially available developed by Microsoft Game Console (XBOX Kinect™) exergames that specifically target ataxia dysfunctions.
Other Names:
  • Exergaming

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Gait score
Time Frame: Day 43
Decrease in a quantitative composite gait score consisting of body sway and gait variability in walking challenge conditions (mattress), assessed by VICON-based motion tracking
Day 43

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Brain networks captured
Time Frame: Day 43
Changes in brain networks captured by specific neuroimaging focussing on brain grey matter volume (VBM), brain fibre tracking (DTI) and functional connectivity of the cerebellum with other brain regions (resting-state connectivity)
Day 43
Quantitative movement parameters
Time Frame: Day 43
Set of quantitative movement parameters for complex whole-body movements (gait, stand, fast sequences of goal-directed stepping movements) (VICON-based motion tracking).
Day 43
Ataxia severity
Time Frame: Day 43
Clinical ataxia severity according to the Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA)
Day 43
Daily activity
Time Frame: Day 43
Objectively measured level of daily activity in subjects' real-world settings (body-worn motions sensors; ActivePal®)
Day 43
Brain-derived neurotrophic factor
Time Frame: Day 43
Increase of serum brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF)
Day 43

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University Hospital Tuebingen

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
August 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
February 1, 2017

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
May 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 11, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 11, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 16, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 16, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 11, 2016

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • SlowSCA

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings