Use of a Squatting Assist Device in Patients With Constipation

June 29, 2026 updated by: Adil Bharucha, MBBS, MD, Mayo Clinic
Constipation is a very common problem. Western style toilets that are nearly universal in the United States require the person to sit on the toilet. However, results from uncontrolled studies suggests that a squatting posture (as prevalent in many foreign countries) may be better at facilitating evacuation compared to a Western style commode. One uncontrolled, unpublished study suggests that a footstool improved bowel symptoms in nearly 98% of 153 constipated participants. Hence, the investigators propose to evaluate the benefits of a footstool on symptoms and anorectal functions in constipated patients. Hypothesis: the regular squatting assist device (7 inches) but not a sham device (2 inches tall) will improve symptoms of constipation.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Active, not recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
107

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Minnesota
      • Rochester, Minnesota, United States, 55905
        • Mayo Clinic in Rochester

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion criteria:

  • Able to communicate adequately with the investigator and to comply with the requirements for the entire study
  • Meet Rome III criteria for functional constipation as assessed by questionnaires in period 1, i.e., report at least 2 of the following symptoms for last 3 months or more with symptom onset at least 6 months prior to diagnosis: a) <3 SBMs/week b) hard or lumpy stools ≥ 25% of time c) straining ≥ 25% of time d) sense of incomplete evacuation ≥ 25% of time e) feeling of anorectal blockage ≥ 25% of time or f) manual maneuvers to facilitate defecation ≥ 25% of time. Patients who meet Rome III criteria for irritable bowel syndrome will also be eligible provided they also meet above criteria.

Exclusion criteria:

  • Clinical evidence of significant cardiovascular, respiratory, renal, hepatic, gastrointestinal. hematological, neurological, psychiatric or other disease that may interfere with the objectives of the study and/or pose safety concerns.
  • History of total, hemi- or subtotal colectomy at any time or other abdominal operations within 60 days prior to entry into the study. Segmental resection of the colon (e.g. sigmoid resection) for diverticulitis will be permitted.
  • Current or past history of colon or rectal cancer, scleroderma, inflammatory bowel disease, congenital anorectal abnormalities, rectal prolapse, solitary rectal ulcer syndrome, history of rectal resection or pelvic irradiation
  • Active cancer
  • Pregnant or nursing women, prisoners and institutionalized individuals
  • Weight > 300 lbs.
  • Current or Prior use of Squatty Potty®
  • Current use of opioid analgesics. Patients on opioids will be allowed to participate if they have discontinued them for at least 3 days (72 hrs.) before date of screening and are willing to stay off them for the duration of the study.
  • Current use of anticholinergics (e.g. nortriptyline, amitriptyline, hyoscyamine). Patients who use low dose tricyclic antidepressants (nortriptyline upto 50 mg/day or amitriptyline upto 25 mg/day ) will be eligible provided they do not increase the dose during the study period. Patients on higher doses or on other anticholinergics are eligible to participate if they can discontinue their medication at least 3 days (72 hrs) before the date of screening and are willing to stay off them till the study is complete.
  • Current use of laxatives (MiraLax, Ex-lax, senna, herbal supplements), linaclotide, lubiprostone, and prucalopride to treat constipation- patients using these medications will be eligible to participate if they can discontinue the medication at least 3 days (72 hrs.) before the date of screening and are willing to stay off them till the study is complete.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Squatting Assist Device
The Squatty Potty is a 7 inch tall stool to assist subjects in maintaining a squatting position while using a toilet. While sitting on the toilet, the subject supports her feet on the Squatty Potty.
Device: Squatting Assist Device
The Squatty Potty is a 7 inch tall stool to assist subjects in maintaining a squatting position while using a toilet. While sitting on the toilet, the subject supports her feet on the Squatty Potty.
Other Names:
  • Squatty Potty
Sham Comparator: Sham Squatting Assist Device
This stool will be 2 inches tall and be similar in appearance to the Squatty Potty. While sitting on the toilet, the subject supports her feet on the 2 inch high stool.
Device: Sham Squatting Assist Device
This stool will be 2 inches tall and be similar in appearance to the Squatty Potty. While sitting on the toilet, the subject supports her feet on the 2 inch high stool.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean Weekly Complete Spontaneous Bowel Movement (CSBM) Frequency
Time Frame: baseline, 4 weeks
Subjects completed a bowel diary indicating the number of CSBMs they had each week. Weekly CSBM Frequency = (Number of CSBMs recorded in 7 days/Number of days with bowel entries in subject diary) X 7
baseline, 4 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean Weekly Spontaneous Bowel Movement (SBM) Frequency
Time Frame: Baseline; 4 weeks
Subjects completed a bowel diary indicating the number of SBMs (bowel movements that occurred without requiring the use of a laxative or enema or of manual disimpaction) they had each week. Weekly SBM frequency= (Number of SBMs recorded in 7 days /Number of days with bowel entries) X 7
Baseline; 4 weeks
Mean Bristol Stool Form Score (BSFS)
Time Frame: Baseline; 4 weeks
The Bristol Stool Scale classifies human stool into seven types, ranging from hard lumps (1) indicating constipation to watery stools (7) indicating diarrhea. Total scores range from 1 to 7 with higher scores indicating less constipation.
Baseline; 4 weeks
Straining Severity Score
Time Frame: Baseline; 4 weeks
Straining severity score was measured using a 5-point scale. Total scores ranged from 1 to 5 with higher scores indicating more severe straining.
Baseline; 4 weeks
Worst Abdominal Bloating Score
Time Frame: Baseline; 4 Weeks
Worse abdominal bloating score was measured using a 5-point scale. Total scores ranged from 1 to 5 with higher scores indicating more abdominal bloating.
Baseline; 4 Weeks
Average Overall Relief of Constipation Score
Time Frame: Week 2, Week 3, Week 4
Overall relief of constipation score was measured using a 7-point scale. Scores ranged from 1 (considerably relieved) to 7 (significantly worse) with higher scores indicating worse overall relief. The average scores were calculated through week 2, week 3 and week 4 then combined for a total overall average relief score divided by 3.
Week 2, Week 3, Week 4
Adequate Relief of Constipation
Time Frame: Week 1, Week 2, Week 3, Week 4
The number of subjects who reported adequate relief of constipation for ≥ 3 of 4 weeks during treatment period
Week 1, Week 2, Week 3, Week 4
Satisfaction With Effects of the Foot Stool on Bowel Symptoms
Time Frame: 4 Weeks
Satisfaction was rated on a 5-point scale from 1 (not at all satisfied) to 5 (very satisfied). Total score ranges from 1-5 with higher scores indicating higher satisfaction.
4 Weeks
Perceived Improvement in Constipation With Foot Stool Use
Time Frame: 4 Weeks
Perceived improvement in constipation with foot stool use was measured using a 100-point scale. Scores ranged from 0 (no improvement) to 100 (extremely improved) with higher scores indicating higher perceived improvement.
4 Weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Mayo Clinic

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Adil E Bharucha, MBBS, MD, Mayo Clinic

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 30, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 19, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 23, 2016

First Posted (Estimated)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 24, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
July 28, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 29, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
June 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 16-004548

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings