Efficacy and Tolerability of Enstilar® in Daily Practice

December 12, 2019 updated by: LEO Pharma

Prospective, Observational, Non-interventional, Multicenter Study on the Efficacy and Tolerability of Calcipotriol/Betamethasone Aerosol Foam (Enstilar®) in Patients With Plaque Psoriasis Under Daily Practice Conditions

This study aims to assess how the Enstilar® aerosol foam performs in daily real-life practice with regards to effectiveness and convenience of application to psoriasis plaques on body and extremities. In addition the profiles of patients prescribed Enstilar® will be described, and preceeding, concomitant and follow-up management will be mapped. The study will be conducted in about 100 dermatology clinics all over Germany,

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
410

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Germany
      • Kiel, Germany
        • Clinic for Dermatology, Venereology and Allergy, University Clinic Schleswig-Holstein

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Adult patients with psoriasis vulgaris plaques on trunk and/or extremities of at least mild severity for whom topical treatment with Enstilar® is planned

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • ≥ 18 years of age
  • Psoriasis vulgaris
  • Lesions on trunk and/or extremities of at least mild severity
  • Treatment with Enstilar® planned
  • Signed informed consent to participate

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Enrolled in any interventional clinical trial
  • Ongoing or recent treatment with any systemic psoriasis
  • Ongoing or recent treatment with UV-therapy
  • Ongoing or previous treatment with Enstilar®
  • Psoriasis of scalp only
  • Other forms of psoriasis, e.g. erythrodermic or pustular psoriasis
  • More than 30% of surface area affected by psoriasis
  • Any contraindications or known allergies to Enstilar® or its ingredients
  • Incapacitated patients under institutionalized care

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Enstilar®
Patients with psoriasis vulgaris plaques on body and/or extremities will apply Enstilar® (calcipotriol /betamethasone dipropionate (50 micrograms/g + 0.5 mg/g) cutaneous foam) once daily for up to 4 weeks, according to the approved labelling of Enstilar® in Germany.
Drug: Enstilar®
Once daily application of cutaneous foam to plaques on body and/or extremities
Other Names:
  • calcipotriol/betamethasone dipropionate cutaneous foam

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Investigator Global Assessment
Time Frame: Week 4
5-point Likert scale
Week 4
Percentage of total body surface area affected
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Percentage
4 weeks
Absence of related adverse events (ADR)
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Proportion of patients with no ADRs
4 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient Global Assessment
Time Frame: 4 weeks
5-point Likert scale
4 weeks
PASI 50
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index
4 weeks
PASI 75
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index
4 weeks
Patient reported itching
Time Frame: 4 weeks
10-point scale
4 weeks
Patient reported sleep loss
Time Frame: 4 weeks
10-point scale
4 weeks
Patient reported erythema
Time Frame: 4 weeks
10-point scale
4 weeks
Patient reported scaling
Time Frame: 4 weeks
10-point scale
4 weeks
Patient reported dry skin
Time Frame: 4 weeks
10-point scale
4 weeks
Patient reported overall treatment satisfaction
Time Frame: 4 weeks
4-point Likert scale
4 weeks
Patient reported satisfaction with effectiveness
Time Frame: 4 weeks
4-point Likert scale
4 weeks
Patient reported satisfaction with tolerability
Time Frame: 4 weeks
4-point Likert scale
4 weeks
Patient reported satisfaction with convenience
Time Frame: 4 weeks
4-point Likert scale
4 weeks
Dermatology Life Quality Index
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Standard Quality of Life Questionnaire (DLQI)
4 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
LEO Pharma

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Sascha Gerdes, Dr.med., Clinic for Dermatology, Venereology and Allergy, University Clinic Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
March 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
March 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 23, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 23, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 29, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
December 13, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 12, 2019

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
December 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • NIS-ENSTILAR-1295

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings