Setmelanotide for the Treatment of Early-Onset Pro-Opiomelanocortin (POMC) Deficiency Obesity

August 30, 2023 updated by: Rhythm Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

An Open-Label, 1-Year Trial, Including a Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Withdrawal Period, of Setmelanotide (RM-493), a Melanocortin 4 Receptor (MC4R) Agonist, in Early Onset POMC Deficiency Obesity Due to Bi-Allelic Loss-of-Function POMC or PCSK1 Genetic Mutation

To demonstrate statistically significant and clinically meaningful effects of setmelanotide on percent body weight change in participants with pro-opiomelanocortin (POMC) deficiency or proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 1 (PCSK1) deficiency obesity due to rare biallelic or loss-of function mutations at the end of 1 year of treatment.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
15

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Belgium
      • Gent, Belgium, 9000
        • UZ Gent
  • Canada
    • Ontario
      • Brampton, Ontario, Canada, L6W 2Z8
        • Peel Memorial Hospital
  • France
      • Paris, France, 75013
        • Institute of Cardiometabolism and Nutrition / Hopital de la Pitié-Salpêtrière
  • Germany
      • Berlin, Germany, 13353
        • Charité Campus Virchow-Klinikum / Institute for Experimental Pediatric Endocrinology
  • Spain
      • Madrid, Spain, 28009
        • Hospital Universitario Niño Jesus
  • United Kingdom
      • Cambridge, United Kingdom, CB2 0QQ
        • University of Cambridge Metabolic Research Laboratories
  • United States
    • Arizona
      • Scottsdale, Arizona, United States, 85258
        • Honor Health Research Institute

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

6 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Bi-allelic, homozygous or compound heterozygous (a different gene mutation on each allele) genetic status for either the POMC or PCSK1 genes, with the loss-of-function (LOF) variant for each allele conferring a severe obesity phenotype.
  2. Age 6 years and above.
  3. If adult age ≥ 18 years, obesity with body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30 kilograms per square meter (kg/m^2); if child or adolescent, obesity with BMI ≥ 95th percentile for age on growth chart assessment.
  4. Study participant and/or parent or guardian is able to communicate well with the investigator, to understand and comply with the requirements of the study, and be able to understand and sign the written informed consent/assent, after being informed about the study.
  5. Female participants of child-bearing potential must agree to use contraception as outlined in the protocol. Female participants of non-childbearing potential, defined as surgically sterile (status post-hysterectomy, bilateral oophorectomy, or bilateral tubal ligation) or post-menopausal for at least 12 months (and confirmed with a screening follicular stimulating hormone [FSH] level in the post-menopausal lab range), or have delayed pubertal development and failure to have achieved menarche, do not require contraception during the study.
  6. Male participants with female partners of childbearing potential must agree to a double barrier method if they become sexually active during the study. Male participants must not donate sperm during and for 90 days following their participation in the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Recent intensive (within 2 months) diet and/or exercise regimen with or without the use of weight loss agents, including herbal medications, that has resulted in weight loss or weight stabilization. Participants may be reconsidered approximately 1 month after cessation of such intensive regimens.
  2. Prior gastric bypass surgery resulting in >10% weight loss durably maintained from the baseline pre-operative weight with no evidence of weight regain.
  3. Diagnosis of schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, personality disorder or other Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-III) disorders that the investigator believes will interfere significantly with study compliance.
  4. A Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) score of ≥ 15.
  5. Any suicidal ideation of type 4 or 5 on the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS). Any lifetime history of a suicide attempt, or any suicidal behavior in the last month.
  6. Current, clinically significant pulmonary, cardiac, or oncologic disease.
  7. History of significant liver disease or liver injury, or current liver assessment for a cause of abnormal liver tests (as indicated by abnormal liver function tests, alanine transaminase [ALT], aspartate transaminase [AST], alkaline phosphatase, or serum bilirubin [> 2.0 x upper limit of normal (ULN) for any of these tests]) for an etiology other than non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Thus, any underlying etiology besides NAFLD, including diagnosed non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), other causes of hepatitis, or history of hepatic cirrhosis will be exclusionary, but the presence of NAFLD would not be exclusionary.
  8. History or presence of impaired renal function as indicated by clinically significant abnormal creatinine, blood urea nitrogen (BUN), or urinary constituents (e.g., albuminuria) or moderate to severe renal dysfunction as defined by the Cockcroft Gault equation < 30 mL/min.
  9. History or close family history (parents or siblings) of skin cancer or melanoma, or participant history of ocular-cutaneous albinism.
  10. Significant dermatologic findings relating to melanoma or pre-melanoma skin lesions, determined as part of a screening comprehensive skin evaluation performed by a qualified dermatologist.
  11. Participant is, in the opinion of the study investigator, not suitable to participate in the study.
  12. Participation in any clinical study with an investigational drug/device within 3 months prior to the first day of dosing.
  13. Significant hypersensitivity to study drug.
  14. Inability to comply with every day (QD) injection regimen.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Setmelanotide
Participants received titrated doses of setmelanotide once daily, by subcutaneous (SC) injection during titration period for 2 - 12 weeks. Thereafter, participants continued setmelanotide at their specific therapeutic dose for an additional 10 weeks during the open label treatment period. Participants who achieved at least a 5 kilograms (kg) weight loss (or at least 5% weight loss if baseline body weight was <100 kg) at the end of the open label treatment period, continued into the 8-week double-blind withdrawal period and received 4 weeks setmelanotide and 4 weeks placebo. Following the withdrawal period, participants entered open label treatment period and received setmelanotide to complete approximately 52 weeks (~1 year) of treatment at a therapeutic dose.
Drug: Setmelanotide
Once daily SC injection
Other Names:
  • RM-493
Drug: Placebo
Once daily SC injection

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants Who Reached ≥10% Weight Loss Threshold After 1 Year (Pivotal Cohort)
Time Frame: Week 52
The percentage of participants who met the ≥ 10% weight loss threshold after approximately Week 52 (~1 year) of treatment were analyzed.
Week 52

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants Who Reached ≥10% Weight Loss Threshold After 1 Year (Pivotal + Supplemental Cohort)
Time Frame: Week 52
The percentage of participants who met the ≥ 10% weight loss threshold after approximately Week 52 (~1 year) of treatment were analyzed.
Week 52
Mean Percent Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 52
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 52
The mean percent change from baseline in body weight at 52 weeks was analyzed.
Baseline, Week 52
Mean Percent Change From Baseline in Hunger Score (Worst "Most" Hunger in 24 Hours) at Week 52
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 52
The mean percent change in hunger scores for participants ≥12 years of age with leptin receptor (LEPR) deficiency obesity in treatment with setmelanotide was evaluated. Hunger score ranged from 0 - 10 on a Likert-type scale; 0 = not hungry at all and 10 = hungriest possible. On the Daily Hunger Questionnaire, each of the 3 items (average hunger, most/worst hunger, and morning hunger) was scored separately and averaged on a weekly basis. The weekly average hunger score of the daily worst (most) hunger score in 24 hours is the hunger score used to assess this study endpoint.
Baseline, Week 52
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least 25% Improvement in Daily Hunger From Baseline
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 52
The percentage of participants (≥12 years of age) achieving a ≥25% improvement from baseline in hunger score at Week 52 (i.e., after treatment with setmelanotide for 52 weeks at the therapeutic dose) was assessed. Hunger ranged from 0 - 10 on a Likert-type scale; 0 = not hungry at all and 10 = hungriest possible. On the Daily Hunger Questionnaire, each of the 3 items (average hunger, most/worst hunger, and morning hunger) was scored separately and averaged on a weekly basis. The weekly average hunger score of the daily worst (most) hunger score in 24 hours is the hunger score used to assess this study endpoint.
Baseline, Week 52
Absolute Change From Baseline in Waist Circumference at Week 52
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 52
Waist circumference (centimeters) was measured according to the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) criteria. Waist circumference was measured when participants were fasting at approximately the same time at each visit. The absolute change from baseline in waist circumference was assessed.
Baseline, Week 52
Absolute Change in Body Weight (Reversal of Weight Loss) During Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Withdrawal Period
Time Frame: Baseline, 8-week withdrawal period (up to ~Week 20)
A comparison of weight change was evaluated during the 8 week placebo-controlled withdrawal period for each participant, during which each participant received 4 weeks of placebo and 4 weeks active therapy in a blinded fashion.
Baseline, 8-week withdrawal period (up to ~Week 20)
Absolute Score in Daily Hunger Reduction During the Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Withdrawal Period
Time Frame: 8-week withdrawal period (up to ~Week 20)
The absolute score in daily hunger during the double-blind placebo-controlled withdrawal period (≥12 Years of Age) was assessed. Hunger ranged from 0 - 10 on a Likert-type scale; 0 = not hungry at all and 10 = hungriest possible. On the Daily Hunger Questionnaire, each of the 3 items (average hunger, most/worst hunger, and morning hunger) was scored separately and averaged on a weekly basis. The weekly average hunger score of the daily worst (most) hunger score in 24 hours is the hunger score used to assess this study endpoint. Lower scores represent lower hunger, higher scores represent greater hunger.
8-week withdrawal period (up to ~Week 20)
Mean Percent Change From Baseline in Body Mass Index (BMI) at Week 52
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 52
The mean percent change from baseline in BMI was assessed.
Baseline, Week 52
Area Under the Curve (AUC) Change From Baseline in Oral Glucose, Assessed by the Oral Glucose Tolerance Test (OGTT)
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 52
The AUC change from baseline for the OGTT was assessed. The AUC was calculated by the linear trapezoidal method and includes pre-dose and post-dose assessments. At each visit, oral glucose was captured pre-meal, and post-meal at the following times: 30 minutes, 60 minutes, 90 minutes, and 120 minutes. OGTT was not performed for participants with a diagnosis of Type 1 or Type 2 diabetes.
Baseline, Week 52
Change From Baseline in Serum Glucose at Week 52
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 52
Change from baseline in serum glucose at Week 52 was assessed.
Baseline, Week 52

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Rhythm Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Chair: David Meeker, MD, Rhythm Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
February 14, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
May 25, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
May 25, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 18, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 6, 2016

First Posted (Estimated)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
September 12, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 21, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 30, 2023

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • RM-493-012
  • 2016-002320-83 (EudraCT Number)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings