Tolerability of Using a Post-Treatment Topical Adjuvant Combination Following Fractional Radiofrequency Ablation
Clinical Evaluation of the Tolerability of Using a Post Treatment Topical Adjuvant Combination Following Fractional Radiofrequency Ablation Using the Venus Viva
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
California
-
Newport Beach, California, United States, 92660
- Dr. George Taylor
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Undergoing a dermatological procedure requiring ablation and resurfacing of the facial skin utilizing the Venus Viva™ SR system.
- Women of child-bearing age are required to be using a reliable method of birth control prior to enrollment and throughout their participation in the study.
- Able to tolerate the treatment as determined by a test spot application(s).
Exclusion Criteria:
- Superficial metal or other implants in the treatment area
- Tattoos, permanent makeup, scars or piercings in the treatment area.
- Any active condition in the treatment area, such as sores, psoriasis, eczema and rash.
- Any surgical procedure in the treatment area within the last three months or before complete healing.
- Receiving therapies or medication that may interfere with the study treatment.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Topical combination therapy
Application of human bone marrow stem cell derived growth factor and cytokines serum followed by a botanical lipid-based occlusive immediately post-radio-frequency treatment of the face
|
Other Names:
|
|
No Intervention: Standard of care
No topical therapies for 24 hours post-radio-frequency treatment of the face
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Subject Treatment Tolerability Score Post Treatment 1 at 24hrs Post Treatment
Time Frame: 24hr post treatment one
|
Tolerability 5-point Likert scale where 4 - Very Tolerable, 3 - Tolerable, 2 - Having no opinion, 1 - Intolerable and 0 - very intolerable; The higher the score, the more tolerable the subject indicates the treatment is.
|
24hr post treatment one
|
|
Subject Treatment Tolerability Score Post Treatment 1 at 72hrs Post Treatment
Time Frame: 72 hrs post treatment one
|
Tolerability 5-point Likert scale where 4 - Very Tolerable, 3 - Tolerable, 2 - Having no opinion, 1 - Intolerable and 0 - very intolerable; The higher the score, the more tolerable the subject indicates the treatment is.
|
72 hrs post treatment one
|
|
Subject Treatment Tolerability Score Post Treatment 2 at 24hrs Post Treatment
Time Frame: 24hr post treatment two
|
Tolerability 5-point Likert scale where 4 - Very Tolerable, 3 - Tolerable, 2 - Having no opinion, 1 - Intolerable and 0 - very intolerable; The higher the score, the more tolerable the subject indicates the treatment is.
|
24hr post treatment two
|
|
Subject Treatment Tolerability Score Post Treatment 2 at 72 Hrs Post Treatment
Time Frame: 72hr post treatment two
|
Tolerability 5-point Likert scale where 4 - Very Tolerable, 3 - Tolerable, 2 - Having no opinion, 1 - Intolerable and 0 - very intolerable; The higher the score, the more tolerable the subject indicates the treatment is.
|
72hr post treatment two
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Visual Analog Scale
Time Frame: immediately following radio-frequency treatment
|
10 cm Subject discomfort scale where 10 cm indicates 'Pain as bad as it can be' and 0 cm indicates there is no pain at all associated with the application of the treatment.
Zero pain means a better outcome.
Subjects were categorized as to having no pain (0 - 0.4cm), mild pain (0.5 - 4.4cm), moderate pain (4.5 - 7.4cm) and severe pain (7.5 - 10cm).
|
immediately following radio-frequency treatment
|
|
Fitzpatrick Wrinkle and Elastosis Scale
Time Frame: change in appearance of wrinkles from baseline and at end of study, average of 24 days
|
Investigator assessment of improvement in wrinkles and elastosis where Class I indicates fine wrinkles, Class II indicates fine to moderate depth wrinkles with a moderate number of lines and Class III indicates fine to deep wrinkles, numerous lines with or without redundant skin folds with a score of 1 - 3 (Mild) indicates fine texture changes with subtly accentuated skin lines, a score of 4 - 6 (Moderate) indicates distinct papular elastosis ([indvidual papules with yellow translucency under direct lighting] and dyschromia and a score of 7 - 9 (Severe) indicates multipapular and confluent elastosis [thickened yellow and pallid] approaching or consistent with cutis rhomboidalis.
A lower class and a lower score means a better outcome.
Subjects were divided into 3 categories - No change in FWES score, change in FWES score by one and non-evaluable.
|
change in appearance of wrinkles from baseline and at end of study, average of 24 days
|
|
Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale
Time Frame: change in skin appearance between baseline and at end of study, average of 24 days
|
Investigator assessment of aesthetic improvement where 1 shows exceptional improvement, 2 shows very improved, 3 shows improvement, 4 shows unchanged and 5 indicates that the subject appearance has worsened.
A low score means a better outome.
Subjects were categorized to either GAIS improved or GAIS no change.
|
change in skin appearance between baseline and at end of study, average of 24 days
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Study Director: Joseph L Reiz, BSc, Venus Concept Ltd.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- CS0116
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.