A Study to Evaluate the Safety of Tralokinumab in Adults and Adolescents With Uncontrolled Asthma

July 26, 2019 updated by: AstraZeneca

A 52-Week, Open-Label, Multicentre Study to Evaluate the Safety of Tralokinumab in Japanese Adults and Adolescents With Asthma Inadequately Controlled on Inhaled Corticosteroid Plus Long-Acting β2-Agonist

A 52-Week, Open-Label, Multicentre Study to Evaluate the Safety of Tralokinumab in Japanese Adults and Adolescents with Asthma Inadequately Controlled on Inhaled Corticosteroid plus Long-Acting β2-Agonist

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Terminated

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This is a 52-week, open-label, multi-centre study designed to evaluate the safety of tralokinumab in a fixed 300 mg dose every 2 weeks, administered subcutaneously in adults and adolescents with indequately controlled asthma on medium to high dose inhaled corticosteroid plus long acting β-2 antagonist. Approximately 26 Japanese subjects will be recruited to receive 22 completed.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
28

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Japan
      • Chuo-ku, Japan, 103-0027
        • Research Site
      • Itabashi-ku, Japan, 173-8610
        • Research Site
      • Yokohama-shi, Japan, 236-0004
        • Research Site

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

12 years to 75 years (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age 12 - 75 yrs
  2. Documented physician-diagnosed asthma
  3. Documented treatment with inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) at a total daily dose corresponding to ≥500 µg fluticasone propionate dry powder formulation equivalents and a long-acting beta-2 agonist (LABA)
  4. Pre-bronchodilator (BD) forced expiratory volume at one second (FEV1) value of ≥40% of their Predicted Normal Value (PNV)
  5. Asthma Control Questionnaire-6 (ACQ-6) score ≥1.5

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Pulmonary disease other than asthma
  2. History of anaphylaxis following any biologic therapy
  3. Hepatitis B, C or HIV
  4. Pregnant of breastfeeding
  5. History or cancer
  6. Current tobacco smoking or a history or tobacco smoking for ≥10 pack-years
  7. Previous receipt of tralokinumab

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Open-label study to evaluate safety
A fixed 300 mg dose every 2 weeks (Q2W) of tralokinumab administered subcutaneously in subjects with inadequately controlled asthma on medium to high-dose of inhaled corticosteroid plus long-acting β2-agonist.
Biological: Tralokinumab open-label
Subcutaneous injection; fixed dose; 300 mg
Other Names:
  • Tralokinumab

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Time Frame: From Screening (Day -14) up to 14 weeks after end of treatment (Week 66).
An AE was development of an undesirable medical condition or deterioration of a pre-existing medical condition following or during exposure to a pharmaceutical product, whether or not considered causally related to product. An undesirable medical condition can be symptoms, signs or the abnormal results of an investigation. In clinical studies, an AE can include an undesirable medical condition occurring at any time, including run-in or washout periods, even if no study treatment has been administered. A SAE was an AE occurred during any study phase that fulfils one or more of the following criteria: death; immediately life-threatening, in-patient or prolongation of existing hospitalization; persistent or significant disability/incapacity or substantial disruption of ability to conduct normal life functions; congenital abnormality or birth defect; important medical event that may jeopardise participant or may require medical intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed above.
From Screening (Day -14) up to 14 weeks after end of treatment (Week 66).
Number of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities
Time Frame: From Screening (Day -14) up to 14 weeks after end of treatment (Week 66).
Blood and urine samples for determination of clinical chemistry, haematology and urinalysis parameters were taken at the times. Changes in haematology and clinical chemistry variables between baseline and each subsequent scheduled assessment were evaluated. Baseline is defined as the last available value measured prior to the first dose of study treatment. The change from baseline is defined as the treatment period value minus the baseline period value. Absolute values were compared to the relevant reference range and classified as low (below range), normal (within range or on limits) or high (above range). The AstraZeneca extended reference ranges were used for laboratory variables (where they exist). All values (absolute and change) falling outside the reference ranges were flagged. Urinalysis data were categorised as negative (0), trace or positive (+) at each time point.
From Screening (Day -14) up to 14 weeks after end of treatment (Week 66).
Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examinations
Time Frame: From Screening (Day -14) up to 14 weeks after end of treatment (Week 66).
Physical examination included assessment of general appearance, skin, head and neck (including eyes, ears, nose, mouth and throat), lymph nodes, abdomen, musculoskeletal (including spine and extremities), cardiovascular, respiratory, and neurological systems. Criteria for abnormal physical findings were based on investigator's discretion.
From Screening (Day -14) up to 14 weeks after end of treatment (Week 66).
Number of Participants With Vital Signs Abnormalities
Time Frame: From Screening (Day -14) up to 14 weeks after end of treatment (Week 66).
Vital signs that were planned to be assessed included parameters such as pulse, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, respiration rate and body temperature.
From Screening (Day -14) up to 14 weeks after end of treatment (Week 66).
Number of Participants With 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities
Time Frame: At Day -14 and Week 52.
The ECG assessments were performed using an ECG device prior to blood drawing, spirometry, investigational product administration and bronchodilator administration. ECG data and evaluation was planned to be performed by the site Investigator.
At Day -14 and Week 52.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
AstraZeneca

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Takeshi Kaneko, MD, PhD, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
November 11, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
January 19, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
January 19, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
September 13, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 13, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
September 16, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 6, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 26, 2019

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
July 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • D2210C00029

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings